- Joined
- Sep 1, 2015
- Messages
- 18,175
- Supports
- ️
Thanks for the replies
I’m more intrigued by the mindset of those on both sides as to what some of the distinguishing differences are when we discuss the topic centred more around how a person is feeling about the issue as opposed to what the person believes to be fact.
I appreciate that if you are looking at this case in black and white terms then what has been made public and the possible connotations of th
In the absence of full belief of innocence do we default to not guilty of anything despite public evidence suggesting something to the contrary?
Again I know the answer from a legal point of view I’m more interested in peoples personal beliefs on this.
It may not be a question some people want to answer and that’s ok. But I am interested in both sides beliefs of his innocence.
I will take from your response then that you don’t doubt Greenwood is innocent?
What about how the clips were released makes you think he’s innocent?
I think I’m trying to establish if there is anyone who is happy to have him back that has doubts over his innocence or equally are there those who don’t want him back who doubt their convictions in the absence of an actual one?I view it as a pointless question.
He could be, he could not be. Why would I think my opinion mattered in the grand scheme of things?
He's a Manchester United player loaned to Getafe. I limit my concern over him to strictly sporting affairs, and related financial concerns the club may have.
I’m more intrigued by the mindset of those on both sides as to what some of the distinguishing differences are when we discuss the topic centred more around how a person is feeling about the issue as opposed to what the person believes to be fact.
I appreciate that if you are looking at this case in black and white terms then what has been made public and the possible connotations of th
And so is that grey area of doubt something you believe we should endorse by allowing him to return?Obviously no-one can wholeheartedly believe in his innocence who doesn’t have access to all of the facts.
There’s still simply too much we don’t know to wholeheartedly believe anything, despite how so many are convinced they can call him a “r****t” on these boards, something he wasn’t even charged with.
In the absence of full belief of innocence do we default to not guilty of anything despite public evidence suggesting something to the contrary?
Again I know the answer from a legal point of view I’m more interested in peoples personal beliefs on this.
So your belief would be he did something and you’d believe this based on the absence of public clarification from his partner?There'd be a very easy solution if it was a big mix up. His wife could just come out and release a statement saying that it's not what it looked like, doesn't even need to give any information if she wants to keep it private. But literally a 1 sentence thing would pretty much make it all go away. The fact that she never did this but is with him 100% points to it being real what happened, but she just "forgave him".
1 sentence and they wouldn't have had to move away, he wouldn't have gone 1.5 years banned from football, he wouldn't be hated worldwide. That's the father of his child and husband (I think they got married?). Anyone who thinks it didn't happen just needs to ask, why didn't she then come out and release any comment to just close the book on this?
I’m asking the right questions for the insight I’m seeking into peoples views.You are asking the wrong questions. Innocent of what? Innocent of rape or battering...Yes...and it is very very probable. Given the nature of how the clips were released...initial statements from the father and the outcome of investigations from the police and club.... it's most likely that none of that serious stuff we think happened, actually happened. love and jealousy can make people do crazy things. Hell hath no fury like a person scorned
It may not be a question some people want to answer and that’s ok. But I am interested in both sides beliefs of his innocence.
I will take from your response then that you don’t doubt Greenwood is innocent?
What about how the clips were released makes you think he’s innocent?
And so I suppose the follow up is in the absence of certainty would you be happy for the club to be potentially endorsing a player who did those things?This is a fair question, and my honest answer is that I don't know what to believe.
On the one hand, the evidence looks damning. However, it lacks context, and I can't image her family (let alone her father) standing behind him if he were abusing their daughter. I think it's possible they abused each other and didn't want to admit it, but it's all speculation at this point.