TheGame
Full Member
The CPS categorically said there was 'no longer a realistic prospect of conviction'. That in no way equates to innocence, it reflects the fact the withdrawal of key witnesses and new material had undermined the prosecution's case. To me, the withdrawal of 'key witnesses', presumed to include his partner, given they're back together is the main thing, given the offences he was charged with can boil down to he said, she said. Believing that 'new evidence' exonerates him isn't borne out by the statements - it sounds more likely it potentially cast doubt, rather than proved innocence.
Anyway, we're going over old ground and people's views seem pretty entrenched at this point.
Sadly there is just a number of people who are simply clueless about the criminal justice system yet wade into the argument either way.