Bwuk
Full Member
- Joined
- Feb 29, 2012
- Messages
- 18,131
He'll break 20 league goals this season if he keeps this up.
I think that should be the aim for him. He's good enough to do it.
He'll break 20 league goals this season if he keeps this up.
Just noticed he's not in the England squad. I just assumed he was given he's probably the best player in the league after 3 games. Good for us that he'll get some rest and no risk of injury, but what is Southgate thinking? He's taken a bunch of players who have hardly played this season.
I think Southgate said that he's been in constant contact with Greenwood and Ole and that they thought it was best that he stays at united for this international break, but he sees him as a future England player. Not really sure what that means but the rest will do him good.Just noticed he's not in the England squad. I just assumed he was given he's probably the best player in the league after 3 games. Good for us that he'll get some rest and no risk of injury, but what is Southgate thinking? He's taken a bunch of players who have hardly played this season.
Just noticed he's not in the England squad. I just assumed he was given he's probably the best player in the league after 3 games. Good for us that he'll get some rest and no risk of injury, but what is Southgate thinking? He's taken a bunch of players who have hardly played this season.
I don't see the big issue in this. Southgate is clearly in the Ole mould, fringe players like Greenwood will barely feature for England. I would rather him stay at United and rest and develop his game.
We all know Southgate would give him maximum 10 minutes over the period, with Kane fit, no chance Greenwood gets a look in. Too bad for England because he can play RW for them.
Think it's more the case he's started well and they don't want any more distractions or disruptions.
He probably would've played in this break because there's three games and the middle one is against Andorra so there will be a lot of rotation in that game. The options for England are on the thinner side too with Foden and Rashford missing. Calvert-Lewin has withdrawn too. It means that Sancho is likely to get meaningful game time at least.
All our wide players should improve their work rate, at least the ones who will be staying at club.
This table shows how poor our young players are when it comes to work rate.
Position Pressures Percentile James Winger 21.59 94Bruno Attacking mid 21.46 93Lingard Winger 21.14 90Cavani Forward 15.44 64Greenwood Winger 12.78 22Martial Forward 10.39 12Rashford Winger 11.06 10Sancho Winger 10.76 8Ronaldo Forward 6.69 1
Decided to check and compare with our rivals instead of doing work for 10 mins:Feck me. No wonder Fred has to cover so much ground every game. Don’t think there’s a DM in the game who could compensate for playing two wide players who are that much worse than all their peers at helping the defence.
Those stats also show why James gets so many games. One winger who doesn’t defend can be carried but not two at once.
Decided to check and compare with our rivals instead of doing work for 10 mins:
City (Percentile only):
Foden - 60
De Bruyne - 59
Jesus - 55
Bernardo - 50
Torres - 40
Mahrez - 28
Grealish - 21
Sterling - 6
Liverpool:
Jota - 94
Firmino - 88
Salah - 51
Mane - 40
Chelsea:
Mount - 91
Ziyech - 70
Pulisic - 71
Havertz - 43
Werner - 29
Lukaku - 6
TLDR: we got some right lazy bastards in attack.
For me, its not big if he isn't selected this time because I am pretty sure, he will be one of England's key players in years to come.
Decided to check and compare with our rivals instead of doing work for 10 mins:
City (Percentile only):
Foden - 60
De Bruyne - 59
Jesus - 55
Bernardo - 50
Torres - 40
Mahrez - 28
Grealish - 21
Sterling - 6
Liverpool:
Jota - 94
Firmino - 88
Salah - 51
Mane - 40
Chelsea:
Mount - 91
Ziyech - 70
Pulisic - 71
Havertz - 43
Werner - 29
Lukaku - 6
TLDR: we got some right lazy bastards in attack.
Also makes all the crybaby posts in the match day threads about Ole being negative whenever he starts McFred a complete joke.Yikes. Makes you wonder what the DMs at their clubs would look like at United. Be a rude awakening that’s for damn sure!
Make them work harder? I don’t think someone like pep would put up with their lazinessAlso makes all the crybaby posts in the match day threads about Ole being negative whenever he starts McFred a complete joke.
What else is he supposed to do when our attacking starting players (apart from Bruno and Cavani) are incredibly lazy.
Nope, he would just drop Sterling and play one of his other attackers instead.Make them work harder? I don’t think someone like pep would put up with their laziness
Greenwood literally shouldn’t be a fringe player for England though. He’s one of the best attackers in the country already. I certainly can’t see a better option on that RW I mean we literally had Saka there and he’s half the talent.I don't see the big issue in this. Southgate is clearly in the Ole mould, fringe players like Greenwood will barely feature for England. I would rather him stay at United and rest and develop his game.
We all know Southgate would give him maximum 10 minutes over the period, with Kane fit, no chance Greenwood gets a look in. Too bad for England because he can play RW for them.
Greenwood literally shouldn’t be a fringe player for England though. He’s one of the best attackers in the country already. I certainly can’t see a better option on that RW I mean we literally had Saka there and he’s half the talent.
Which is why he’s a pretty poor manager to be honest! Fortunately I think he will perform so strongly this year he will be difficult to ignore!Well that is in your eyes and perhaps me too however; in Southgate's mind its different. He will play Mason Mount RW over Greenwood.
Only if our aim to play that way where that's our CF's job, I really hope it's not.
I think Greenwood's future should be more as a central striker who pulls wide, a bit like Henry would do, and attacks the CB/FB channels or drops in to receive the ball on the turn. This, in my mind, makes sense given how advanced Bruno usually plays anyway & plays to Greenwood's strengths which are standing up a defender before getting a shot off/shooting after coming in from either side.
Problem now is Ronaldo has to start as a 9 given his age so will Greenwood be his sub or will he go RW and move Sancho to the LW....feel like Greenwood should start as 9 until he has a bad game as he should be our priority.
Not only that but if adds two extra goals he'll be the first player to score 40 league goalsIn fact, he will reach exactly 38 goals if he keeps his current goals to games ratio.
I think he’s not far off where he need to be when you think of his age for a much more fluid system. It’d be such a waste if we try to bulk him out and develop him into a back to goal striker.However we play, when we play the ball to our forward line it needs to stick there instead of coming straight back. At the moment Greenwood isn't capable of doing that.
I think he’s not far off where he need to be when you think of his age for a much more fluid system. It’d be such a waste if we try to bulk him out and develop him into a back to goal striker.
3 goals in 3 apps and generally been amongst the better if not best player on the pitch in all three games...I get he'll be displaced by Ronaldo but part of me thinks if we want him to be up there with the best in the world, we should back him more and just give him max game time. Ronnie coming back means we have to win something major this season though.He's 19, nobody is expecting him to be the finished article. We still need to win our games though and Greenwood isn't ready for a 38 game season yet.
Well that's the thing, we shouldn't care. We can permanently transfer JLingz to England for the whole season for all I care, so long as we're keeping Greenwood fresh.Not that I care, but seriously how the feck is he not in the England squad yet lingard is? What is southgate smoking?
Confidence and maybe squad standing? You rarely walk into a team as a rookie and take set pieces.I'm slightly confused as to why Greenwood is not standing over freekicks with Bruno, instead of Fred. Fred is a terrible decoy. Why? Because everyone knows he's not going to shoot. A decoy is meant to keep the opposition keeper guessing. No keeper guesses with Fred around the ball. He isn't going to take it, end of story. Add to the fact that Greenwood is a demonstrably better shooter outside the box and a better direct free-kick taker (See free-kick compilation from U23's/U18's for proof of this). He simply has a better free-kick to goal ratio.
It show fantastic mental strength after all that happening so recently to start this season like he has, ignoring his obvious talent and ability he has the cojones to be a superstar for us.He had a bit of a rough year last season with the Iceland incident, his mate at City dying and the false rumours going round that he was questioned for the crime that it transpires Mendy is alleged of committing. He lost form for a lot of the season with all that stuff going on. I think Ole and Southgate decided that he needs to take things a bit slower.
In fact, he will reach exactly 38 goals if he keeps his current goals to games ratio.
I don't expect him to get dropped anytime soon. He definitely gets in ahead of Sancho on current form, and Dan James has gone so I can see him starting our next few games with Ronaldo, until Rashford gets fit again or Sancho starts to improve to the player we expect him to be.Based on performances and form, he should stay in the starting team obviously. Dont disrupt the momentum, as time will come he will be inconsistent and need a break, then you can throw someone else in and rotate.