Hamadovich86
Full Member
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2013
- Messages
- 2,208
Did his job excellently, teams cant deal with his physicallly so hes a great option to have on the bench but nothing more than that.
Did his job excellently, teams cant deal with his physicallly so hes a great option to have on the bench but nothing more than that.
That's so wrong! If the big guy does a job then he should start. He was more effective than Mata and Rooney combined!
Hes not good enough to start for Manchester United, we should have a higher calibre of players in our squad and now we do. We have better players at the DM, CM and AM/SS roles so why should he start? Mata is playing on the right and doing well so I dont know what you're talking about. Rooney has been shit but surely you dont think Fellaini should play as a striker.
Hes a great option to have coming on from the bench when shit hits the fan but we shouldnt be relying on him to start.
Mata looks like a fish on a bike at right wing and is clogging up our attack. Great wee player but not in that position. I'd rather have Fellaini. If you want style over substance fair enough but right now and last season Fellaini deserves his starting berth and we are a better team with him in the 11. Unless we sign Pedro (Muller or some other fantasy player) Fellaini will replace Mata! You can see this coming surely?
Fellaini as a right winger? Are you serious? On the wings you need tricky/pacey players I dont even think Mata should be playing there let alone fecking Fellaini! If we're talking about deserving things surely no one deserves to start more than Herrera but the system just doesnt suit him so it is what it is. Fellaini is a sub for the second striker position when all else has failed simple as that.
I agree 100% but we have Mata currently who offers little flashes. Fellaini will end up there and add an option with Depay crossing to him like he did last season on the left side. Mata currently needs either moved inside or taken out the team. Herrera hopefully replaces Adnan also and we revert to a 433. If Pedro signs it will be Mata he replaces.
I cant see LvG changing the system unless this one stops working he may devise a secondary system as a backup. Pedro will play on the right when/if he comes and if Memphis will keep his place on the left this means that Januzaj, Herrera, Fellaini and hopefully Mata will fight for the second striker position. I find it odd that van Gall doesnt see Mata as a second striker thats actually his best position hes a really good finisher.
It's good to have him as an option for crosses toward the end of games but it's annoying how we seem to constantly play the long ball when he's on the pitch instead of as a last resort.
This!Could be the 'surprise striker' that van Gaal was referring to in pre-season.
I don't get the problem with long balls to him. Most of the time, they're not hopeful punts up their hoping for a flick on. Most of them are pretty well measured, and he takes them down easy enough, keeps the ball and helps us moving into the opposition half. His goal came from a 'long ball' which he took down, laid off wide and then got in the box for a header.
2+7 yeah, his hold up play would be much better than Rooney's and neither Rooney or Fellaini can take on players.. Fellaini is great in the air unlike Rooney who is a bit average, both player can fight for the ball, Fellaini's a bit better defensively, in case we need to defend more, Fellaini can go deep and Adnan up top or whoever plays in the hole.. Rooney's only better at pinging the balls around from deep positions and is more creative overall but Fellaini seem more effective now..Could be the 'surprise striker' that van Gaal was referring to in pre-season.
Being part of the midfield three can mean you can be part of the forward role. If you are are familiar with the term suffoco, that is basically a second striker who joins the midfield while defending to add number in midfield. As I already stated that is what Fellaini does at the tip of the midfield and that was the role he played most of the time for Van Gaal last season, which is why his performance was noteworthy.
If you believe he is a better midfielder than he is a second striker or number 10, then your opinion is that similiar to Moyes who came to that same conclusion and made Fellaini look like a comedy show during his tenure.
I think carrick did the same thing when he scored against Spurs last season with his head. Could be an inside jokeAny explanation to the number seven during the celebration?
We didn't play long ball when he was on the pitch. This is a Louis van Gaal team we're talking about.
We played crosses into the box when Fellaini came on, but then we were doing that all game anyway.
Memphis maybe? I just came to ask this same thing. He kind of ran away from all the people celebrating and ran over in front of the bench as well.Any explanation to the number seven during the celebration?
Memphis maybe? I just came to ask this same thing. He kind of ran away from all the people celebrating and ran over in front of the bench as well.
Fair enough, maybe he has a personal reason like a fan or something.I thought that but he's in a picture with Herrera in the dressing room post-game gesturing the same again.
Didn't he score 7 goals last year? Or am I just talking out of my ass?
The thing I like about Fellaini is that he is a threat to ANY side. I just wish he'd had some more pace, mobility and better technique. It would make him one of the best strikers in the world.
He has scored 7 goals since he signed.
Some people do not want to hear the truth, I understand. The fact is that Fellaini best performances has come from him playing as a number ten in a tip of a midfield three or second striker since his Everton days. If you can give me fact that showed he was better as a midfielder not as a 10 or a second striker, I would gladly admit that I was wrong which rarely happens.
I do not want to be a party pooper, but I have to defend my integrity since I clarified that he was average before. I am just glad Van Gaal figured out how to use him properly, which is ironic since Moyes knows him best and failed to use him properly.
Didn't do too well, can't remember hearing his name mentioned. 0/10
I can't tell if you are serious or trying to be funny? Either way...