Steven Seagull
Full Member
I don't think you can have good ball retention if you are a bad passer...
Yes you can. (Stats wise)
I don't think you can have good ball retention if you are a bad passer...
Has anyone else noticed this trend of LVG telling us 'player x has picked up a little knock or caught a slight cold' and then it turns into a month or two off because of injury? It's gotten to the point where when he says something like that, it would be more unpredictable if the player actually ended up not injured. Bringing me to next point, if it's in order to confuse other teams; surely it's past the point now where it's clever as I'm sure every manager with a brain out there has caught on to this.
So that begs the question; Why? I'm not going to accuse LVG of being an idiot, because he is anything but that. However it is incredibly frustrating and I am slowly losing my patience as to why he cannot just assess our injury situation honestly. Another thing I've noticed is even when he does admit they're injured, we don't seem to have any clear indication as to when players actually return. He consistently lies about the time it will take for them to come back. Either that, or whoever is giving him the information is completely and utterly inept.
Not really no.
I remember your username simply from all the times you have disagreed with one of my posts. You're telling me you haven't noticed the constant underestimation of a lot of our players injuries when they are first announced?
For the record, we had a long debate in Summer about Rooney where I was of the opinion he was past it and thought we should have sold him on. You disagreed were completely correct in that regard and I'm happy to eat my words on that matter. Something isn't right about the information we are being fed regarding our absentees however. I may be exaggerating or it may be purely down to coincidence but our injuries do seem to end up being a lot worse than what we are told originally; for whatever reason.
It's our medical staff who tells LVG how long they expect the players to be out, LVG has nothing to do with it he only tell us what they tell him. If the players are out for longer then expected it's the medical department that should be blamed not LVG.I remember your username simply from all the times you have disagreed with one of my posts. You're telling me you haven't noticed the constant underestimation of a lot of our players injuries when they are first announced?
For the record, we had a long debate in Summer about Rooney where I was of the opinion he was past it and thought we should have sold him on. You disagreed were completely correct in that regard and I'm happy to eat my words on that matter. Something isn't right about the information we are being fed regarding our absentees however. I may be exaggerating or it may be purely down to coincidence but our injuries do seem to end up being a lot worse than what we are told originally; for whatever reason.
It's our medical staff who tells LVG how long they expect the players to be out, LVG has nothing to do with it he only tell us what they tell him. If the players are out for longer then expected it's the medical department that should be blamed not LVG.
Has anyone else noticed this trend of LVG telling us 'player x has picked up a little knock or caught a slight cold' and then it turns into a month or two off because of injury? It's gotten to the point where when he says something like that, it would be more unpredictable if the player actually ended up not injured. Bringing me to next point, if it's in order to confuse other teams; surely it's past the point now where it's clever as I'm sure every manager with a brain out there has caught on to this.
So that begs the question; Why? I'm not going to accuse LVG of being an idiot, because he is anything but that. However it is incredibly frustrating and I am slowly losing my patience as to why he cannot just assess our injury situation honestly. Another thing I've noticed is even when he does admit they're injured, we don't seem to have any clear indication as to when players actually return. He consistently lies about the time it will take for them to come back. Either that, or whoever is giving him the information is completely and utterly inept.
Not really no.
Has anyone else noticed this trend of LVG telling us 'player x has picked up a little knock or caught a slight cold' and then it turns into a month or two off because of injury? It's gotten to the point where when he says something like that, it would be more unpredictable if the player actually ended up not injured. Bringing me to next point, if it's in order to confuse other teams; surely it's past the point now where it's clever as I'm sure every manager with a brain out there has caught on to this.
So that begs the question; Why? I'm not going to accuse LVG of being an idiot, because he is anything but that. However it is incredibly frustrating and I am slowly losing my patience as to why he cannot just assess our injury situation honestly. Another thing I've noticed is even when he does admit they're injured, we don't seem to have any clear indication as to when players actually return. He consistently lies about the time it will take for them to come back. Either that, or whoever is giving him the information is completely and utterly inept.
When we start Fellaini I always feel like we're playing with a weakened squad, but I really like the idea of having him come off the bench to button things down or chase the late cross on goal.
We drew with Chelsea and lost against City with him in the team.Not sure why you still feel that way. We crushed Liverpool with him, drew 10-man AV without him.
Yeah ball retention is just about making a safe choice, which in Fellaini's case is often to shield the ball and turn backwards away from pressure and find a safe pass. On a good day that keeps the ball very well, but is the opposite of progress and making avenues to attack
I agree with it. Think he gives us an extra avenue when we square up against the big guns or are desperate towards the end of matches. Against the lesser sides I would not pair him up with Carrick or Blind and he cannot replace them, so I would start someone with more attacking intent even if it does mean that we sometimes give the ball away while trying more risky passes in the opponent half.
We drew with Chelsea and lost against City with him in the team.
The problem with that style is that yes he can get by in a match using the ball like (turn away from pressure, find teammate and dont lose the ball) that but as a concequence the rest of the team needs to use the ball better than he is.
You can't have 2 CMs just turning away from pressure and finding high percentage backwards and square passes, because you'd never get the ball down the other end of the pitch. In my opinion its an overcelebrated contribution when Fellaini has played like that and things like his fast release pass to Di Maria a few weeks ago are needed a couple of times per match to make up for it.
In fact thats what I enjoy about Carrick and Blind as defensive midfield players, they are always capable and likely to play a good pass into the front players when its on. They dont just turn away from trouble and play the safe pass all the time like physical defensive midfielders tend to, like Fellaini, Tiote, Wanyama and so on. That makes your team predictable and easier to defend against because you either dont need to put pressure on that player (he's never likely to hurt you) or alternatively you can put lots of pressure on that player and he'll spend the game disrupting your attacks or getting the ball pinched by 2 players hunting him down with a high pressure style
This post has to be a windup.We drew with Chelsea and lost against City with him in the team.
So he went from being ill (sharing the Belgian flu with Adnan) to having a broken rib?
Wtf is going on.
Means more Fletcher it seems.
That Rooney fella has been doing pretty decent in midfield I hear
An excessive amount of coughing fractured a rib.
Defensive midfielder though, somebody to play behind Mata and Rooney. God knows if we can allow ourselves to rest Michael like we did after odd 60 minutes against Nouveauchateau. Our next game is on the first of January, Carras could not be rested enough to play against Stoke which will leave us with one option.
This. Is. Ridiculous.
I've stopped paying attention to preliminary reports of injuries/illnesses because in every case it seems that players miss more time than originally reported. Fletcher cannot be used anymore as a #6, and Carrick can't play every game-but the cupboard is bare as I don't see Herrara as a #6. Blind needs to get healthy--fast.