Blue always red
Full Member
The problem with playing him at the base of a midfield 3 is he has a tendency to run high up the pitch and support attacks. I personally think he's technically quite good and can produce some nice flicks in and around the box, but we'll be left defensively short playing him there and we will end up sacrificing the attacking ability of Herrera.
When he was partnering Witsel he would maraud up the pitch whenever they had the ball and would stay higher up when they didn't. I just don't think he would work in that role. I still stand by the fact he would be a useful plan B to bring off the bench when we need a goal. If anything, we should learn from City who only had plan A which was tiki-taka style and lost the league because teams had learned to sit in their box. They bought Fernandinho and Navas and won the league. Barca too can be used as an example.
When he was partnering Witsel he would maraud up the pitch whenever they had the ball and would stay higher up when they didn't. I just don't think he would work in that role. I still stand by the fact he would be a useful plan B to bring off the bench when we need a goal. If anything, we should learn from City who only had plan A which was tiki-taka style and lost the league because teams had learned to sit in their box. They bought Fernandinho and Navas and won the league. Barca too can be used as an example.