alexthelion
Full Member
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2019
- Messages
- 4,051
What about the seasons previous to this one?My point is that even great players will decline in an awful team. The reality is that Haaland scores goals for fun at City but would struggle at United. Is Haaland not worth his wage?
We are currently 6 points above the relegation zone with a squad that cost hundreds of millions. We have 23 points in 20 matches with a negative goal difference. We are a historically bad team for a club of our size. It's just a fact.
Again, Suarez and RVP never played in teams as bad as this United team so it's an absurd comparison. Even if you want to compare them, both Suarez and RVP would earn significantly more than Rashford. They would both easily be on £500k+.
It's very difficult to judge our players because we are just a terribly run club. We have spent £1.6 Billion on players in the past 12 years and none of them have produced consistently. Even Bruno was awful to start this season. Common sense says it's no longer only an individual player problem.
All of you who criticize Rashford never want to admit how awful we are, so your arguments are disingenuous . Yes Rashford is responsible for his career but clubs need to provide an environment for players to produce. As I said before, Postecoglou said Salah would struggle at Spurs. Salah is better than Rashford and Spurs are ahead of us in the table. So even he agrees with me.
Send Rashford on loan to a better team in an easier league so he can raise his value. Rashford is capable of producing in the right environment.