- Joined
- Sep 28, 2013
- Messages
- 641
This guy is the very best of us.
If this was a tory politician the Daily Mail wouldn’t blink an eye.
Or a white footballer who isnt working class.If this was a tory politician the Daily Mail wouldn’t blink an eye.
Fecking scumbags. DM is the lowest tier trash, wouldn’t even wipe my arse with it. Cnuts.
I though as Tory campaigners this is the type of story they'd love, 'kid from humble background makes good.' I guess it only applies if you're white and TorySo much to like about the way he responds to both the snide remarks and the glaringly obvious smear campaign content. Always real, always classy.
Hats off to you, Marcus!
I though as Tory campaigners this is the type of story they'd love, 'kid from humble background makes good.' I guess it only applies if you're white and Tory
I know a lot of Tories are no strangers to philanthropy, and Rashford distributing some of his own wealth is far from a socialist manifesto. Still, in his promotion of equal opportunities, while crediting the support of others as instrumental for his personal success, Marcus has somehow managed to respectfully ridicule the past efforts and political posturings of the Tory government. He's done it so elegantly that they have had no opportunity but praising him.I though as Tory campaigners this is the type of story they'd love, 'kid from humble background makes good.' I guess it only applies if you're white and Tory
The problem with going after Rashford - is that he seems really capable of standing up for himself on social media. So if I was a tabloid journalist thiking about going after him - I would really think twice about it!
It was politicised the moment he started campaigningI know a lot of Tories are no strangers to philanthropy, and Rashford distributing some of his own wealth is far from a socialist manifesto. Still, in his promotion of equal opportunities, while crediting the support of others as instrumental for his personal success, Marcus has somehow managed to respectfully ridicule the past efforts and political posturings of the Tory government. He's done it so elegantly that they have had no opportunity but praising him.
This dirt take on Marcus's investments is an opportunity for the Tories to regain control of the narrative. I am not saying they are behind it, but people with Tory sentiments surely must rejoice over these "news". The Tories now can steady the ship and keep on promoting elitism, protectionism and uphold anti-regulatory policies - or "freedom" for the wealthy and powerful.
Sorry for politicising the thread, but you inspired me Inigo Montoya.
Whereas I think we should all get together and send their mail office envelopes of our own sh*t, in response for us having their sh*t forced upon us.Best way to solve this type of stuff which is disgusting is to send some traffic to the publisher not in a nasty way because we aren’t nasty but more of disappointment.
If you catch my drift.
Or I may be having a strategic PR nightmare here.
I know a lot of Tories are no strangers to philanthropy, and Rashford distributing some of his own wealth is far from a socialist manifesto. Still, in his promotion of equal opportunities, while crediting the support of others as instrumental for his personal success, Marcus has somehow managed to respectfully ridicule the past efforts and political posturings of the Tory government. He's done it so elegantly that they have had no opportunity but praising him.
This dirt take on Marcus's investments is an opportunity for the Tories to regain control of the narrative. I am not saying they are behind it, but people with Tory sentiments surely must rejoice over these "news". The Tories now can steady the ship and keep on promoting elitism, protectionism and uphold anti-regulatory policies - or "freedom" for the wealthy and powerful.
Sorry for politicising the thread, but you inspired me Inigo Montoya.
I was just not saying they absolutely were behind it. What I believe to be the truth though... I certainly don't believe it is below their standards to run a smear campaign, that's for sure!Your post seems sensible until you said the Tories aren't behind the smear. Wake up, their mates edit all these papers.