He's going to be more of an inside forward than a wing. His dribbling needs work, yeah. Tends to do everything too quick which results in losing the ball too often.His dribbling isn't good enough for the wing.
He's going to be more of an inside forward than a wing. His dribbling needs work, yeah. Tends to do everything too quick which results in losing the ball too often.His dribbling isn't good enough for the wing.
Yeap just out of form along with the rest of the team.Needs the summer. Wish people would get off his back. He's an honest player with a good attitude. Bad spells of form happen.
Never mind the beginning of his career, he looked like the real deal at the beginning of Ole's tenure. He needs a good talking to, and a summer to sharpen up, but it's way too early to give up on Rashford. That being said, I would love to ship out Lukaku and bring in a more dynamic striker to compete with Rashford (unless Martial is that guy - who really knows?)Heartbreaking to see such a big talent look so completely devoid of confidence and desire.
The guy looked so lively and fearless at the start of his career!
It's actually not really fair to say that (and this comes from someone who can't stand Lingard.)It's fair to say Jesse Lingard has been an awful influence on him.
The most telling thing today was that chance after chance fell to Mason Greenwood. He also created quite a few.
That's a good striker in the making.
Rashfords talents rely heavily on outpacing the back line. He needs to work on the mental side of the game.
It's fair to say Jesse Lingard has been an awful influence on him.
It'll be very naive if Ole relies far too heavily on Rashford next year as our main forward.
It's fair to say Jesse Lingard has been an awful influence on him.
Reminder that he’s also entering the final year of his contract (with an option for 1-year extension) and he’s allegedly asking for the same pay packet as Martial. Which is in the 180-200k pw category. I can’t argue with the logic to be on the same as Martial, but you know that’s what happens when you reward failure with huge contracts.
Great position to be in as a club, to have these 3 marvellous forwards (Sanchez, Rashford, Martial) on a combined cost of 3/4s of a million per week.
/s
My ideal scenario is that Greenwood ends up a star and Rashford becomes a super sub that can fill in at LW or ST as a starter when needed. I still like Rashford and if he becomes a great forward in 1-2 years, then my ideal scenario matters naught. I don't expect him to be the finished product right now and I don't expect United to win right now. I'm hoping United turn this around in 2-3 years.Do you prefer to play Rashford as striker or left winger / wide forward (like Martial)?
Anyone think a year on loan would do him a world of good?
It's fair to say Jesse Lingard has been an awful influence on him.
No. He needs to stay here and be managed properly. Ole is using him as if he is Mbappe. He is a kid who makes poor decisions and he needs to be a support player, not the main man.
Managed properly is a big If. I can see Ole being the death of him by continuously blowing smoke up his arse and hyping him up even more.
Mancunian agbonhalor
The English press won't allow him. Articles like "Rashford needs to leave" would be flooding the floor. How can we start Rashford and wish to finish top 4 where he's competing with likes of Kane and son and Aguero.No. He needs to stay here and be managed properly. Ole is using him as if he is Mbappe. He is a kid who makes poor decisions and he needs to be a support player, not the main man.
Yep. Remember when he was stinking up the joint every week under Mourinho so he got dropped for a week or 2 and then their were articles and videos of pundits saying he needs to leave permanently or on loan. All this despite him having some of the most minutes from teenagers in all the European leagues....The English press won't allow him. Articles like "Rashford needs to leave" would be flooding the floor. How can we start Rashford and wish to finish top 4 where he's competing with likes of Kane and son and Aguero.
Yep. Remember when he was stinking up the joint every week under Mourinho so he got dropped for a week or 2 and then their were articles and videos of pundits saying he needs to leave permanently or on loan. All this despite him having some of the most minutes from teenagers in all the European leagues....
The hard on the English press have for Rashford is insane. He obviously doesn't deserve to be starting for us but if he was dropped they'd be at it again. Not that I think Ole will drop him anyway....
The English press won't allow him. Articles like "Rashford needs to leave" would be flooding the floor. How can we start Rashford and wish to finish top 4 where he's competing with likes of Kane and son and Aguero.
Reminder that he’s also entering the final year of his contract (with an option for 1-year extension) and he’s allegedly asking for the same pay packet as Martial. Which is in the 180-200k pw category. I can’t argue with the logic to be on the same as Martial, but you know that’s what happens when you reward failure with huge contracts.
Great position to be in as a club, to have these 3 marvellous forwards (Sanchez, Rashford, Martial) on a combined cost of 3/4s of a million per week.
/s
Anyone think a year on loan would do him a world of good?
Unfortunately, there is some history at this club of getting carried away by the media’s overhyping of English talent. LVG, a manager of much greater experience, bought the story about an overhyped Rooney and we went into that season with only Rooney as an experienced striker. We will see what happens this summer, but the same media people who were overhyping Rooney back then are now overhyping Rashford. They seem to have an agenda that the british players are the only ones who “get” the club and will fight for the badge. Hence Rashford and JLingz seem to start despite their terrible form. Yes, Ole has primary responsibility here. But the undue influence that some in the media have over the club is really part of the rot, because they are once again influencing a manager into believing an overhyped british player will be able to carry our team.
I wouldn't be upset if we got rid of him, if that's the money he's asking. Unless he goes out and scores 30+ goals next season.
If Ole is buying into media hype over what he sees on the pitch and on the training ground, then he'd be a very unintelligent manager. I doubt that’s the case.
We didn’t get rid of Martial though, we offered him a contract on those terms and he never got close to 30g... in any season. Sanchez, who got 30 in his final full season with Arsenal, was offered double that.
If you’re Rashford’s agent and looking at what his teammates earn for how little they deliver, you’d feel absolutely justified in asking parity for your client. It’s not unfair or unreasonable in that context.
We’ve made a rod for our own back with the contracts we offered recently.
Completely agree, but I don’t see why the Rashford apologists on here are so hellbent against him going out on loan. Having a superior striker bench him might not do anything to improve his mood & skill sets & obviously will take away game time which would potentially have the knock on effect of putting his England NT place in doubt. Let him go somewhere where he is the focal point up top in a far less stressful position to see if he can really make the next few steps to become an elite striker. If he does so, he remains firmly ensconced in the English NT & comes back into the club ready to challenge for the striker position. Such a jump simply is not going to happen here, new striker signed next year or not.We simply have to buy a proper striker to bench him next season.
The madness has to end.
Take him off free kicks and tell him to play with his head up.
He should also be benched when playing like shit.
I still believe in him but his attitude and general play has been inexcusable.
I just hope it's a product of this toxic environment.
You ain't made it yet Marcus.
Completely agree, but I don’t see why the Rashford apologists on here are so hellbent against him going out on loan. Having a superior striker bench him might not do anything to improve his mood & skill sets & obviously will take away game time which would potentially have the knock on effect of putting his England NT place in doubt. Let him go somewhere where he is the focal point up top in a far less stressful position to see if he can really make the next few steps to become an elite striker. If he does so, he remains firmly ensconced in the English NT & comes back into the club ready to challenge for the striker position. Such a jump simply is not going to happen here, new striker signed next year or not.
Many on here view Rashford being loaned out as him receiving a scarlet letter or a permanent mark against him. Better United players than him have been loaned out in the past. Yes, there is always the chance of the loan not working, but people are deluded if they think he will somehow rebound magically next season, especially if no quality striker is signed this summer.
I hope so, too, but very little this season has engendered me with a lot of hope in this regard.I would hope that sitting on the bench and watching an improved attack would motivate him to improve and become a legitimate part of it.
That’s how it’s supposed to work with youngsters.
If he can’t temper his attitude and prove his worth then it will be time to part ways.