Agreed. I sense Ralf is trying to mitigate blame coming his way. To be honest I’m more concerned that he didn’t identify CM as the real issue. I would have much preferred a DM being the January signing. If Rangnick was so concerned about our forwards why did he let Martial go out on loan? I’m not suggesting Martial was the answer to our problems but we needed numbers at the very least to rotate.
I think this was the reason. Mark Ogden also reported how shocked Rangnick was that the scouts had no tabs whatsoever on Nkunku for example.
But we did know one of the strong candidates for role was Erik ten Hag. It was between ten Hag and Pochettino.because at that time by all information available united had not decided to get ETH or a permanent manager.
The board agreed with Ralf's assessment and were willing to invest, but the scouting department told the board that there's no-one available.Wait, so did the board agree with him but the heads of scouting said no one available or did the board veto his recommendation?
Completely absurd. The only place where this would be acceptable would be an Austrian government agency ….
Wait, so did the board agree with him but the heads of scouting said no one available or did the board veto his recommendation?
We can only go of what Rangnick has said and the scouts can't veto him. Only the board or John Murtough can do that. But there's no veto in this scenario because Rangnick is a place holder.Wait, so did the board agree with him but the heads of scouting said no one available or did the board veto his recommendation?
No one knew at that time about Greenwood. Martial wanted to go even before Ralf came.
The biggest issue is that at a club of the size of United the scouting department has to be full time. So in an emergency if the manager needs a player, the club should know who is available at least. We are talking about this happening in the transfer window.
I presume what happened is when Greenwood got into trouble Ralf told Murtough that he needs another striker as Martial has already gone. The club then asked the scouting and recruitment department who is available. They told that there is none. The club would have found out that these people didn't do their job properly in actually finding out if there was anyone that could have come.
Now the players available may not have been what eventually ETH wants but that's exactly why Murtough is the DOF.
I can't see any other reason why both of them would leave so suddenly.
This actually makes lot of sense. The club literally needs to invest in scouting department.
Vlahovic- only had eyes on Juve, had previously rejected Arsenal last summer then reportedly again in Jan (could've been an agent tactic to get Juve to move). Finally got his dream move to Juve.Don't think it's a case of vetoing or over rolling RR and the Board. But the three names mentioned seemed a pretty sensible approach
Vlahovic - Too expensive and too complex to complete in 48 hours
Diaz- Relatively covered in that area
Alvarez - Would not hit the ground running (City loaned him back)
He specifically named the 3 players in question in relation to availability in the January window.Was he specifically naming those 3 players as players we should go for or was he just using them as examples that good players can be signed in January?
He specifically named the 3 players in question in relation to availability in the January window.
Surely we needed a dm more than a striker. This club and midfielders though..So let me get this right. Both the manager and board agreed that we needed a forward but our scouts overruled this decision? Has does that even happen? Surely a head scout doesn’t have that much control. No wonder we are in a mess.
Okay, thanks. Read a few tweets from Luckhurst, who is obviously a shit-stirrer, that made it sound differently. Shame, that it is apparently in the embargoed part of the conference.
This makes sense to me.
This makes sense to me.
He specifically named the 3 players in question in relation to availability in the January window.
The owners are incompetent, there's no question about that. But what you're pointing out, is the failure of the board/manager structure.And yet they could have sold Linguard, moved Jones and even Pogba on for a small fee to get of wage bill and done none of that.
Awful ownership
This is exactly why a director of football is needed, we can't just keep hiring managers and giving them sole responsibility.
What happens if Ten Hag fails, will we go with Allegri next? A director of football or someone that can identify how we should play, then hire managers to play that style, then sign players based on that style.
The above tweet isn't saying the manager will get sole responsibility but rather it's normal for clubs to sign players with the football department and head coach being in-sync on the mid to long-term strategy.This is exactly why a director of football is needed, we can't just keep hiring managers and giving them sole responsibility.
What happens if Ten Hag fails, will we go with Allegri next? A director of football or someone that can identify how we should play, then hire managers to play that style, then sign players based on that style.
Ralf complained about the inability to bring any top coaches with him due to the circumstances out of his control in his first press conference here. He was fully aware himself.We can only go of what Rangnick has said and the scouts can't veto him. Only the board or John Murtough can do that. But there's no veto in this scenario because Rangnick is a place holder.
Tbh with you, Rangnick has done a very poor job coaching the team and his choice of coach couldn't have been anymore underwhelming (Chris Armas), even if I did give him the benefit of the doubt when he first arrived. I think even if we had signed a forward and midfielder, we'd still not have made top 4 due to how we deteriorated under Rangnick. And I was his biggest cheer leader when he first arrived.
It's best if Erik ten Hag arrives and provides the guiding principle because it was clear to me after the first 5 weeks of Rangnick's tenure that he wasn't going to get us top 4. And tbf to him, he did lose the aid of Kieran Mckenna but brought in a very underwhelming replacement.
The above tweet isn't saying the manager will get sole responsibility but rather it's normal for clubs to sign players with the football department and head coach being in-sync on the mid to long-term strategy.
I don't totallly disagree with what you're saying about the hand he was dealt with regarding coaches. But imo, the coach he did bring in was way below the required level and his CV/resume reflected that. I was expecting him to bring in someone with a bigger pedigree.Ralf complained about the inability to bring any top coaches with him due to the circumstances out of his control in his first press conference here. He was fully aware himself.
The first thing he tried to do was keep Carrick here, but his mind was already made up when his character was attacked prior to Ralf arriving.
In an ideal world he wouldn't have chose Armas either, but he was the only one willing to come here on such short notice/only 6 month contract. We were lucky to even get him tbf.
Yes the coaches were not ideal. But there's been zero excuses for how easily the players have given up since the Átletico defeat. They've shown they couldn't care less about top 4 as most will be trying to leave.
I remember how the players were exhausted after one half playing Ralf's way vs. Palace in his first match. How they were physically unfit to play a pressing style. Also how they've had difficulties adapting to his instructions.
Then the reports of players complaining because of extra training sessions and going home in the dark when we're at our lowest point in decades. In this regard the team has been almost uncoachable at times.
We desperately needed the clear out, so all of this is what it is. When Ten Hag arrives at least he will have the platform to be a success now. That to me will be Rangnick's job done.
I wonder if it's even significant funds that's needed. Just hiring the right people will make a big difference.It seems obvious significant funds need to go into scouting and recruitment rather than big name/big contract signings.
That makes sense. The board has normally not impeded managers making signings. It's the identification of the correct talents that has plagued us for over a decade now.The board agreed with Ralf's assessment and were willing to invest, but the scouting department told the board that there's no-one available.
We did have a idea about who the next manager was going to be, because it was reported it was between ten Hag and Pochettino.And that's completely fine, discuss things with the manager when he's here, but in January we had no idea who was going to be the next manager, what's needed is someone up top who can implement a style that can sign players that will fit that style.
I'm sure Ten Hag wouldn't have minded having someone that can play the way he wants to play, the only problems it would cause is if we're signing players who can play the way Ten Hag plays, but then hiring a manager like Mourinho or Simeone, as it is we've missed out on what seems to be a gem (Diaz) because we didn't want to make a decision without a managers input (but we're more than happy to give Fernandes a big new contract even though he was tied down for another 4 years anyway).
The board agreed with Ralf's assessment and were willing to invest, but the scouting department told the board that there's no-one available.
I would have liked that to be the case too. Apparently we had difficulties due to Brexit:I don't totallly disagree with what you're saying about the hand he was dealt with regarding coaches. But imo, the coach he did bring in was way below the required level and his CV/resume reflected that. I was expecting him to bring in someone with a bigger pedigree.
And I'm the same poster who sang Rangnick's praises when he was appointed. But I don't have a problem calling a spade a spade. I don't have a horse in this race and my agenda is Man Utd.
We can only go of what Rangnick has said and the scouts can't veto him. Only the board or John Murtough can do that. But there's no veto in this scenario because Rangnick is a place holder.
Tbh with you, Rangnick has done a very poor job coaching the team and his choice of coach couldn't have been anymore underwhelming (Chris Armas), even if I did give him the benefit of the doubt when he first arrived. I think even if we had signed a forward and midfielder, we'd still not have made top 4 due to how we deteriorated under Rangnick. And I was his biggest cheer leader when he first arrived.
It's best if Erik ten Hag arrives and provides the guiding principle because it was clear to me after the first 5 weeks of Rangnick's tenure that he wasn't going to get us top 4. And tbf to him, he did lose the aid of Kieran Mckenna but brought in a very underwhelming replacement.
It was like this when SAF was there though. The difference was he could convince players to come simply by his presence. We don’t have that anymoreIt's frightening that we seem to be so far behind other top clubs, since Fergie there looks to have been an air of complancy around the club, cushy jobs, no accountability, rewarding failure, let's hope things change quickly
Don't think it's a case of vetoing or over rolling RR and the Board. But the three names mentioned seemed a pretty sensible approach
Vlahovic - Too expensive and too complex to complete in 48 hours
Diaz- Relatively covered in that area
Alvarez - Would not hit the ground running (City loaned him back)