GreatDane
Full Member
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2019
- Messages
- 1,973
HarshShoot Pellistri
HarshShoot Pellistri
He's a more traditional wide player. He doesn't seem comfortable taking on a shot with his weak foot when it's not on to take it with his strong foot. So naturally he looks to pass it inside with his strong footOne more thing I like about Pellistri.
When he does cut inside, he's always looking for a pass, not a dumb ass shot that goes on the stands like our other right winger.
Before this place got all woke.
He sucked. Like I told him plenty of times, he should have kept to posting gifs.
Ciderman was a big lossI’ve been on this forum for 16 years now, I’ve never seen a poster post any moment or goal from any given match on demand. He’s without a doubt a huge loss to the forum. Just because his opinions or posts rubbed some up the wrong way, isn’t a reason to lose the huge upside he offered. I swear some of you would have needed therapy if you saw the likes of Pert or Weaste post back in the day.
I feel that Rashford would have had a field day against this Palace defence. Garnacho could have run at them more. He's played a little too safe for me. Remember Garnacho started the first two games on the left and was our worst player in both games.I'd start him over the current Rashford.
I've been here long enough to remember Weaste! And it shouldn't be a case of looking the other way because someone occasionally stops posting shite for long enough to put up a short-lived video clip.I’ve been on this forum for 16 years now, I’ve never seen a poster post any moment or goal from any given match on demand. He’s without a doubt a huge loss to the forum. Just because his opinions or posts rubbed some up the wrong way, isn’t a reason to lose the huge upside he offered. I swear some of you would have needed therapy if you saw the likes of Pert or Weaste post back in the day.
Pert got banned as well, pretty sure he started beef with a knitting forum once, ah those were the good old days. The general was a different place with those guys around. Before this place got all woke.
Yeah I’m kinda baffled at people saying he was great.Pellistri did not do well tonight.
Nobody hates PellestriPellestri haters can do one. He has done a really good job down the right.
Not sure. He does not put in the work unlike GarnachoI feel that Rashford would have had a field day against this Palace defence. Garnacho could have run at them more. He's played a little too safe for me. Remember Garnacho started the first two games on the left and was our worst player in both games.
Quite a few people in here were saying he was rubbish at half-time.Nobody hates Pellestri
The Caf is a weird place.
We have Antony who runs his socks off all game with very little attacking output and gets slammed.
Contrary to this we have Rashford with lots of attacking output but doesn’t work his socks off and gets slammed.
There’s no pleasing everyone.
It seemed like most of our attacking play was going down the right. We should have created more clear cut chances though. We kind of wasted our dominance from that perspective, and I can see why people might (unfairly) blame Pellistri for that, seeing as he was doing most of the running.Don't know what you lot had against Facundo.
He had a really good game on that right flank. Linked up well with Dalot.
I was joking because you wrote his name wrong.Quite a few people in here were saying he was rubbish at half-time.
Yeah I’m kinda baffled at people saying he was great.
Michael Salisbury