Sassy Colin
Death or the gladioli!
Really thought we would clear out some more dead wood by now. Still time but we're leaving it late.
Fletcher looks like he is on his way and nobody wants Anderson.
Really thought we would clear out some more dead wood by now. Still time but we're leaving it late.
Really thought we would clear out some more dead wood by now. Still time but we're leaving it late.
There's a reason they're considered dead wood.
Hence, the lack of buyers.
I don't think we'll ever find anyone to take Ando off our books.
Thank goodness for small mercies. It is annoying about all the wages this waste of space has taken off us and we will get nothing back for him.We don't need to, he's out of contract in the summer.
Yeah he is No.10 but he could be a better fit than the one we currently have so that shouldn't stop us from getting him. We haven't had much success in this particular role because we can't decide on how to use Rooney, if we view him as a second striker then we should steer clear of De Bruyne like we should have done with Mata/Kagawa because playing a 10 behind two strikers leaves you a bit unbalanced. If we want to persist with two strikers then it makes sense to go for an AM in the Ronaldinho/Hazard mould who can operate effectively from wide positions.No more #10's plz!
Eaxactly to me I would have one striker with Rooney behind. The fact he is playing two up front and a supposed No.10 is causing problems.Yeah he is No.10 but he could be a better fit than the one we currently have so that shouldn't stop us from getting him. We haven't had much success in this particular role because we can't decide on how to use Rooney, if we view him as a second striker then we should steer clear of De Bruyne like we should have done with Mata/Kagawa because playing a 10 behind two strikers leaves you a bit unbalanced. If we want to persist with two strikers then it makes sense to go for an AM in the Ronaldinho/Hazard mould who can operate effectively from wide positions.
Sure they're stingy, but out of respect to Fletcher I think we'd do the right thing by allowing him to negotiate freely to get the best deal possible for himself. I wish him well and hope he can enjoy a few more seasons at a high level, although he's not really at the level we need. Best of luck to him.So West Ham will take Fletcher off our hands, as long as it doesn't cost them anything. Don't do us any favours Sam...
http://hereisthecity.com/en-gb/2015...ng-on-old-trafford-officials-over-darren-fl/?
So West Ham will take Fletcher off our hands, as long as it doesn't cost them anything. Don't do us any favours Sam...
http://hereisthecity.com/en-gb/2015...ng-on-old-trafford-officials-over-darren-fl/?
Really thought we would clear out some more dead wood by now. Still time but we're leaving it late.
Jesus that list is pretty mental all things considered. And to think we do still have some players we would consider deadwood, not good enough or too injury prone to be reliable (Lindegaard, Young, Evans, Smalling, Jones, Valencia). Then you could argue about wrong fit for the team in Mata, Fellaini, Herrera, Falcao (not bad players per se but just not fitting in the current system). HHard to know if the players should change or the formation should.I think we've done exceptionally well to get rid of the amount we have. Getting rid of Buttner, Macheda, Vidic, Evra, Kagawa, Bebe & a few youngsters who wouldn't have made it, as well as the likes of Cleverley, Powell & Zaha on loan. Not to mention the player's that were merely squad options that have either already gone or will soon be gone (Fletcher, Hernandez & dependant on your views Nani).
The likes of Anderson were always going to be here until their contract expired. But realistically in 1 year we could be looking at having gotten rid of or let leave/retire:
Buttner
Macheda
Vidic
Evra
Kagawa
Bebe
Welbeck
Cleverley
Zaha
Powell
Fletcher
Hernandez
Nani
Bebe
Anderson
Giggs
That's pretty insane - probably around £45m a year in wages alone (ignoring the fact that Young/Evans must be pretty nervous).
Jesus that list is pretty mental all things considered. And to think we do still have some players we would consider deadwood, not good enough or too injury prone to be reliable (Lindegaard, Young, Evans, Smalling, Jones, Valencia). Then you could argue about wrong fit for the team in Mata, Fellaini, Herrera, Falcao (not bad players per se but just not fitting in the current system). HHard to know if the players should change or the formation should.
I agree, fit the system round the players strengths. Otherwise there could be wholesale changes every season.To be honest, you should really build the system around the players you have.
Jesus that list is pretty mental all things considered. And to think we do still have some players we would consider deadwood, not good enough or too injury prone to be reliable (Lindegaard, Young, Evans, Smalling, Jones, Valencia). Then you could argue about wrong fit for the team in Mata, Fellaini, Herrera, Falcao (not bad players per se but just not fitting in the current system). HHard to know if the players should change or the formation should.
To be honest, you should really build the system around the players you have.
At the moment we don't have all the players to play any formation successfully. So whichever system he wants from next season he is going to have to strengthen somewhere.As I've said in another thread today, I think Van Gaal is right to be planning for his own system and whoever can't play that doesn'thave a future. Every manager has a goal of how they want to play and Van Gaal is in a position where he is starting from scratch. Why should he make short term changes that slow down the progress to the long term goal?
As I've said in another thread today, I think Van Gaal is right to be planning for his own system and whoever can't play that doesn'thave a future. Every manager has a goal of how they want to play and Van Gaal is in a position where he is starting from scratch. Why should he make short term changes that slow down the progress to the long term goal?
I agree. How he arrived at the decision to play that system, having only started playing it less than a year earlier, without any real knowledge of the squad and having been told, presumably, that 352 has never been used by the club, or been successful in this league, is what I would question.As I've said in another thread today, I think Van Gaal is right to be planning for his own system and whoever can't play that doesn'thave a future. Every manager has a goal of how they want to play and Van Gaal is in a position where he is starting from scratch. Why should he make short term changes that slow down the progress to the long term goal?
I agree. How he arrived at the decision to play that system, having only started playing it less than a year earlier, without any real knowledge of the squad and having been told, presumably, that 352 has never been used by the club, or been successful in this league, is what I would question.
But yeah, if he genuinely believes this is the way to go then he has to do it. I suspect it might be the sword he falls upon, though (in the context of not being successful enough, rather than him being sacked).
He's said a lot of things. He said for a long period earlier in the season that he did want to play it.The only thing is, hes already said its not the system he wants to play. We'll be playing a different system next season, when he gets the players he wants presumably.
At the moment we don't have all the players to play any formation successfully. So whichever system he wants from next season he is going to have to strengthen somewhere.
It's a ridiculous transformation over such a short period of time. I think particularly those three will be here as good-great squad options, even if Van Gaal does have a different direction he wants to take the team. However I do agree with Cassidy, the team should be built around the likes of Herrera & Mata. If in the Summer we can get two quality central defenders and a top class winger we should be able to play any system the manager wants.
Agreed, would like to see more use of what we have and in the correct positions but i do reckon that our questionable defence (in terms of availability due to fitness issues and general lapses in concentration) means LVG is not comofortable with any combination of two defenders for the majority of matches.To be honest, you should really build the system around the players you have.
The only thing is, hes already said its not the system he wants to play. We'll be playing a different system next season, when he gets the players he wants presumably.
Yeah I think that goes without saying.
At the moment this is what I'm expecting:
Out:
Blackett - Released
McNair - Released
Evans - Sold
Jones or Smalling - Sold
Valencia - Sold
Fletcher - Released (this window)
Falcao - Not signed
Nani - Sold
Zaha - Sold
Powell - Sold
In:
A rightback
Two centrebacks
A midfielder
A winger
A striker
All high quality but most importantly all in fitting with Van Gaal's plans. The centrebacks will be players that can play RCB or LCB leading to consistency in the back line through being able to play two trusted centrebacks whoever is available.
I.E. If we signed Hummels and Godin (no idea who but just an example)
Godin - Hummels
Smalling - Hummels
Godin - Rojo
Hummels - Rojo
Smalling - Rojo
Smalling - Godin
You'd hope with a 4 like that you could make a pair as long as two are fit.
The other positions speak for themselves, the more quality we have in other areas the more likely Van Gaal can find a formation that lets us play more freely.
I’d agree that he doesn’t see the 3-5-2 as his long term plan. However, until he gets the players in who can play his system then he should not only play a formation that brings out the player’s best abilities but more importantly the team’s strength.
Otherwise he may not be here long enough to implement his style. That’s something we simply can’t afford to let happen.
Same, I can only imagine his persistence with 352 is because of our issues at the back, as it makes us harder to beat than a 442 or a 433 would with the backlines we are having to put out.
Once we get a CB who doesn't get injured putting his boots on to partner Rojo I think we'll see a switch to a more attacking formation, and a better style of play.
But realistically in 1 year we could be looking at having gotten rid of or let leave/retire:
Buttner
Macheda
Vidic
Evra
Kagawa
Bebe
Welbeck
Cleverley
Zaha
Powell
Fletcher
Hernandez
Nani
Bebe
Anderson
Giggs
That's pretty insane - probably around £45m a year in wages alone (ignoring the fact that Young/Evans must be pretty nervous).
Funny thing is I don't actually believe 352 has made us more solid or diffucult to beat at all. In fact I would say its had the opposite effect, we still conceed about that same amount of chances per game statistically, but create far fewer chances ourselves....
The most solid we have looked as a team was vs Chelsea, granted we still conceeded chances, but we looked good both defensively and offensively at various moments in the game. That was with a back 4 and playing with 1 Striker...
I haven't looked at the stats to verify any of this, but when we do play 352 it certainly seems that we have much more possession of the ball, albeit at the same time looking less likely to do anything positive with it.
It seems that LvG is holding to the mantra that if we have the ball, the opposition can't score, and is hoping for some individual brilliance from RVP/Falcao/Rooney/Di Maria to get a goal from nowhere and hold on.
In my opinion, we looked best this season playing 442 with a diamond, but an inconsistent defence and the tendency to lose the ball often seems to have put that to bed, at least until we have more balance between attack and defence.
TBH the posession thing isn't neccesarily down to the formation, we have also made a change in the way we pass the ball, a lot less risks being taken. Also players who tend to make those risks in CM (Herrera) playing a lot less, and (Di Maria) was out injured, he was the player who would conceed possesion the most for us, but was also our most creative player - RISK TAKER. Likely reason why LVG has moved him out of CM and has tried to play him on the wing at first and now as a striker, the boss obv doesn't like his CMs taking risks.
Still both Rooney and Fellaini have given the ball away in midfield leading to us conceeding a goal in the 352 system.
@Pogue Mahone did the stats of 352 vs 442 in terms of chances conceeded, and it turns out we conceeded more chances playing with 352.
the boss obv doesn't like his CMs taking risks.
http://www.espnfc.com/story/2267164...e-ruled-out-stop-gap-january-signings-sources
Article from Miguel Delaney. Says that Roma won't sell Strootman this month and Clyne might be a possibility as he's expected to leave in the Summer anyway. CB and RB priorities but we've struggled to get our top targets in this window, which was expected really.