Manchester united in kaka loan deal

Status
Not open for further replies.
Not to go all GCHQ here but his transfer value has reduced by 1/3 due to him being 1/3 through his contract.

That would put him at about £40m if he had the same stature as at that time and he had not aged, and there was another silly club like Real Madrid to buy him.

So he is off to City for £50m then or back to italy for a reasonable £20m.

Alternatively he loves United and demands a loan with the chance of £20-£25m sale in the summer.
 
SittingBull said:
Hopefully Hernandez can preach about Manchester United to him, as he is exactly what we need in midfield now
Click to expand...

What another crocked player on the long road to recovery and form?
 
The only way it would happen for any club other than shitty or chelski is that Kaka would be loaned out for 6 months with a guaranteed sell on price at the end of that. The player would obviously have to prove his fitness to any potential suitors.

35m at the end of it I'd guess.

It'll not be something United will manage to sort out but feck me I'd bust a nut if it did. He'd surely fancy us too? I mean he was/is friendly with both Becks and Ronny so he couldn't get any higher recommendations.

My guess is that Madrid may well want to sell him before he loses all his resale value but as I mentioned, only shitty or possibly chelski would be prepared to take the gamble of buying him outright.
 
If Kaka regains his old form what will happen to Ozil?

If Kaka doesn't regain his old form what will happen to Kaka?

Both sides of the coin indicate that one of these two muppet legends might become available sometime soon
 
RDCR07 said:
And I suppose you are gonna help United pay his 50M asking price? That is ridiculous amount of money for a guy who is almost 29 and is struggling with injuries the past two seasons. It is not realistically possible to spend that much money on anyone even young and is a hot prospect let alone a guy entering the twilight years of his career.
Click to expand...

I agree that 50 mil is over the top, but thats just the paper inventing a nice round figure. I think i mentioned in my post that fergie would only move if the transfer fee was pretty much a bargain. I also mentioned that i thought the transfr was highly inpropable.
 
RDCR07 said:
And I suppose you are gonna help United pay his 50M asking price? That is ridiculous amount of money for a guy who is almost 29 and is struggling with injuries the past two seasons. It is not realistically possible to spend that much money on anyone even young and is a hot prospect let alone a guy entering the twilight years of his career.
Click to expand...

edit: he turns 29 in April. So yeah you're right, nearly 29.
 
Crustanoid said:
If Kaka regains his old form what will happen to Ozil?
Click to expand...
shunted on the wing, instead of Di Maria

Crustanoid said:
If Kaka doesn't regain his old form what will happen to Kaka?
Click to expand...
That Kaka tattoo that the fickle Shitty fan made prematurely will finally come in handy.

Crustanoid said:
Both sides of the coin indicate that one of these two muppet legends might become available sometime soon
Click to expand...

Well yes, but either way it won't be us that could get them..
 
In my gut I know he'd be fantastic here. But it's a massive gamble and of course this is all speculation as to whether or not he is actually available anyway.

He's a United type of player, flair, pace (I know, his knee might have finished his explosive speed off) and passing vision with an eye for a goal.
 
Why on earth do people keep thinking Chelsea can afford a 35-50m transfer fee?! Its been ages since they've spent big.
 
wr8_utd said:
Why on earth do people keep thinking Chelsea can afford a 35-50m transfer fee?! Its been ages since they've spent big.
Click to expand...

To be fair, they haven't really had to. They've always been there of thereabouts. It's only now that their squads age is beginning to tell.
 
amolbhatia100 said:
To be fair, they haven't really had to. They've always been there of thereabouts. It's only now that their squads age is beginning to tell.
Click to expand...

Their still not going to splash out to those amounts imo. Only City would pay the amount Madrid might want for Kaka. Not Chelsea.
 
Why do people think Kaka plays in midfield? He plays behind the striker, in the free role. If he were to come here, Berbatov would be dropped. Anderson or Scholes would be dropped when we opt for the 4-5-1. That just isn't happening.
 
johnmufc said:
Why do people think Kaka plays in midfield? He plays behind the striker, in the free role. If he were to come here, Berbatov would be dropped. Anderson or Scholes would be dropped when we opt for the 4-5-1. That just isn't happening.
Click to expand...

Sadly Scholes won't last forever plus Kaka often plays wide in a 4-3-3. And you're not very fond of Anderson are you?

Do you not think a fit Kaka would improve our team john? you do have some strange opinions but surely not that strange?
 
I prefer Nani as a winger to Kaka.

Berbatov is playing well at the moment. There is no need for him to be replaced.
 
Kaka is not a Scholes/Lampard. Brazilian attacking midfielders rarely learn defensive responsibility and he's no different
 
wr8_utd said:
Why on earth do people keep thinking Chelsea can afford a 35-50m transfer fee?! Its been ages since they've spent big.
Click to expand...

they must be saving up!

i think kaka probably would get a game here but its never going to happen
 
prefer ronaldo and tevez

id pay 20 mil tops for injurt struck kaka
 
Another can't play in a 2 man midfield myth. They are midfielders, they can play in whatever formation they're put in, it may take a while to adjust but they can do it.
 
Red Indian Chief Torn Rubber said:
If Scholes did it for years why not this fellow? Kaka has excellent positional sense, and isn't useless defensively like a lot of Brazilian attacking midfielder's. He'd fit in a 2 man midfield easy.
Click to expand...

Firstly, scholes is very underrated defensively. Secondly surely kaka would be useless in scholes' recent quarter back role. If kaka were to bomb forward like scholes of old wed need a keane next to him and I don't see one around.
 
amolbhatia100 said:
Firstly, scholes is very underrated defensively.
Click to expand...
He really isn't.Scholes' only weakness has been tackling. Positionally he is as sound as they come. It's only now that he has lost the legs that he gets caught out.

amolbhatia100 said:
Secondly surely kaka would be useless in scholes' recent quarter back role..
Click to expand...
Not really. His playmaking skills are not that poor. But he'd be better suited in a free role ala Lampard and a Scholes of old.

amolbhatia100 said:
If kaka were to bomb forward like scholes of old we'd need a Keane next to him and I don't see one around.
Click to expand...
Yes. But Kaka is capable of being a more restricted verison of Scholes of 1999. He did so for Milan before they switched from a 2 striker formation to a 4-3-2-1. That is why I'm sure would ala a Modric suit playing alonsgide a Carrick. Because his positional sense is marvelous. He doesn't suffer Anderson's current issues with that.
 
Red Indian Chief Torn Rubber said:
He really isn't.Scholes' only weakness has been tackling. Positionally he is as sound as they come. It's only now that he has lost the legs that he gets caught out.

Not really. His playmaking skills are not that poor. But he'd be better suited in a free role ala Lampard and a Scholes of old.

Yes. But Kaka is capable of being a more restricted verison of Scholes of 1999. He did so for Milan before they switched from a 2 striker formation to a 4-3-2-1. That is why I'm sure would ala a Modric suit playing alonsgide a Carrick. Because his positional sense is marvelous. He doesn't suffer Anderson's current issues with that.
Click to expand...

I just don't see it. Carrick is not good enough defensively to deal with Kaka bombing forward. As part of a midfield three he'd be great though.
 
KOV said:
lets get him on loan he sure does well in my united side on fifa11 next to essien :D:lol:

on a serious note who makes these things up? 50 million on a 28 year old?
Click to expand...

Isn't it rumored to be a loan deal? Why would we pay 50 million?
 
I'm surprised this has went 4 pages, I don't see any chance of it happening either now or in the summer.
 
If Barca can loan out Ibra then Real can loan out Kaka.

Loan him to us with an option to buy, He plays a season for us and either we buy him taking him off their books, he regains form and they keep him or he regains form and increases their asking price for them.

If he's surplus to requirements at Real then it's a win win situation all round.

Not that it's going to happen. Just saying.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.