Tom Cato
Godt nyttår!
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2019
- Messages
- 7,713
Thanks I hate it. The prestige of this sponsor is on the lower end of the scale for me.
Also I liked the dark grey shirts :<
Also I liked the dark grey shirts :<
Not bad. Logo looks a bit placed higher up than expected, but really digging the designs.
I never buy official ones. I just buy them from DHGate for like £14.Won’t buy them. I won’t give any money to the owner’s anymore.
Think it would look more stupid if it’s in the middle tbh.Not bad. Logo looks a bit placed higher up than expected, but really digging the designs.
They're exactly the same as the last set of images that were leaked.Not really close to the ‘leaks’. Don’t think those are the shirts.
The horizontal length of the logo bothers me. It would look much better if the icon was centered below the text.
The logo/icon will probably end up being centred above the text, as per the press release when the sponsorship deal was announced.
Exactly, we really are a fantastic cash cow despite Woody and Glazers and not thanks to them. Who we should really thank are SAF, his coaching staff and fans around the world.Woodward's impact on the commercial side is overstated. He's not done anything special with our deals.
Thanks I hate it. The prestige of this sponsor is on the lower end of the scale for me.
Also I liked the dark grey shirts :<
Oh are they? I must have missed that. I was hoping the rumour of the trefoil on the away were true.They're exactly the same as the last set of images that were leaked.
next season shirts
I think these things are made up for clicks on footyheadlines and the like. Considering no other team was rumoured to have the old logo on their kits next season and the fact it was last used on a football kit in 1992, it was extremely unlikely.Oh are they? I must have missed that. I was hoping the rumour of the trefoil on the away were true.
I think these things are made up for clicks on footyheadlines and the like. Considering no other team was rumoured to have the old logo on their kits next season and the fact it was last used on a football kit in 1992, it was extremely unlikely.
The home kit is about as simple as you can get for a United home shirt, but I wouldn't use the word bland for the other two. I think these are two of the most imaginative kits we've had since the 90s.Looks so bland and uninspired.
Looks like the real deal to me. They appear to be the authentic (player's) versions too, given the shape of the hemlines and the way the logos and stripes are applied..are they latest leaks the real deal or more mock ups??
I guess.The home kit is about as simple as you can get for a United home shirt, but I wouldn't use the word bland for the other two. I think these are two of the most imaginative kits we've had since the 90s.
I don’t think the aways can be described as bland. I like the simple home design too.Looks so bland and uninspired.
Looks like the real deal to me. They appear to be the authentic (player's) versions too, given the shape of the hemlines and the way the logos and stripes are applied.
I do like how the 3rd has adidas in yellow and the logo blended.I think these things are made up for clicks on footyheadlines and the like. Considering no other team was rumoured to have the old logo on their kits next season and the fact it was last used on a football kit in 1992, it was extremely unlikely.
next season shirts
The shirts all look great, but the sponsor somehow looks even worse than Chevrolet and pretty much ruins them.
prestige? in a sponsor?
Think of the monumental prestige bestowed by Samsung, makers of a second rate brick that explodes in your hands or AIG, so prestigious and capable it had to be bailed out by the Federal Reserve.prestige? in a sponsor?
Thanks I hate it. The prestige of this sponsor is on the lower end of the scale for me.
Also I liked the dark grey shirts :<
Yeah, I enjoy seeing all the new kits and commenting on them, but even if I like them I don't ever buy them!The only time I would consider buying a footie top would be if that top spread over 2 campaigns, like the olden days, and if that particular top was actually attractive.
Nah come on, Chevy was fugly.The shirts all look great, but the sponsor somehow looks even worse than Chevrolet and pretty much ruins them.
Nah come on, Chevy was fugly.
The more simple the sponsors logo the cleaner the design of the shirt is. It’s not that bad.
I think most are hung up over it not being a cool brand more than anything. Sponsor-Snobbery