- Joined
- May 10, 2009
- Messages
- 37,328
One of the replies killed me, "United had more fans in the 6 yard box a few weeks ago"
One of the replies killed me, "United had more fans in the 6 yard box a few weeks ago"
One of the replies killed me, "United had more fans in the 6 yard box a few weeks ago"
If a plastic club wins the league then surely it is worth posting about.
Yes, I do think City (and PSG) represent the worst parts of modern day football, irrespective of any club loyalties.
Does this bother me? Yes, because I care about football not just being about who has a bottomless pit of money being thrown around by despots.
The Liverpool win was hard to take, but at least I could congratulate and respect their club. With City, I'm afraid the club doesn't deserve that respect. It is a hollow shell of the great club they used to be and has become the worst example of everything older City fans used to rile against.
You've had a Leicester fan, United fans and a Liverpool fan on the last page say it doesn't matter. Go on Reddit or whatever social media site and get a gauge. City winning the title is always the preferred option to your actual rivals winning it for pretty much anyone. They're a lot of people's second team because they're essentially financially guaranteed league titles so there's not the same sense of achievement or jeopardy as you're rivals winning it.
Just because you don't feel that way doesn't mean it's not the broad sentiment.
And again, I don't expect City fans to care about that sentiment but it is what it is.
Well if it is a thread on redcafe of course United fans will get involved. But it’s not like we make the effort to register on bluemoon and post there what we think about City.The fact they have to write posts about it says they care. I mean I don't care bout prince Harry, so I don't make posts bout him saying I don't care. If its worth your time to constantly type it out it shows you care.
Truth is it's the only stick people have left to try and beat City with. We're now a better run club off the pitch and better team on it.
No Liverpool winning was a genuine sporting achievement. That hurt.Yep we care but don't care that you don't care! It's become the norm for others to disregard the wins but true football fans know that most title wins are bought. As underwhelming as it is to others, we are in heaven with the trophies and style of football never seen before, it just fits a lazy narrative to state nobody cares, I didn't care that Liverpool won it last season but it hurt.
Well if it is a thread on redcafe of course United fans will get involved. But it’s not like we make the effort to register on bluemoon and post there what we think about City.
Well yeah fair enough, I enter other teams’ threads on redcafe maybe once a week. I then go on to reply to some absolute crap being posted by some oppos (not you) and then I am done with these threads for a while. Really not interested much in them.I'm not really referring to the occasional poster in here, I'm on about the ones with similar number of posts to me and more about city than United.
yesFirst title was 2012 wasn’t it?
Well no. I care about football and City winning the league is a topic in football whereas I imagine you don't care about the Royal sideshow whatsoever.The fact they have to write posts about it says they care. I mean I don't care bout prince Harry, so I don't make posts bout him saying I don't care. If its worth your time to constantly type it out it shows you care.
Truth is it's the only stick people have left to try and beat City with. We're now a better run club off the pitch and better team on it.
Yeah fairyes
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
count them, thats 10 years
Oh come on, you all feel the same and would rather them than us any day of the week. We'll all forget they won it after a week.
Eh. When Abramovich came in, Chelsea spent £153m NET in the very first season in 2003. This was at a time when United's net spend did not exceed £30m in any single season, never mind Arsenal's. It took United more than a decade to crack the £100m net spend mark.If you mean fans that are unable to comprehend basic statistics then you are absolutely correct. If you look at the statistics though you would see that only 3 clubs have bought the PL. Blackburn, Chelsea & City have all done it with each club vastly outspending their predecessor.
I was genuinely congratulating them.You're a bit bold coming on a United forum to congratulate City.
Not good form really and you know you were wumming!
The celebrations at stadium last night epitomise modern city. managed to do it without breaching covid restrictions. Its all in the pictures, the success, the great branding and the utter boredom of the fans present and not present. This is what soulless success looks like
The crowds outside the Etihad are unreal
"My club is bigger"
"No my club is bigger"
Imagine giving a feck about any of that.
"My club is bigger"
"No my club is bigger"
Imagine giving a feck about any of that.
"My club is bigger"
"No my club is bigger"
Imagine giving a feck about any of that.
Imagine having pride in your club.
Blasphemy!
When Abramovich came in, Chelsea spent £153m NET in the very first season in 2003. This was at a time when United's net spend did not exceed £30m in any single season, never mind Arsenal's. It took United more than a decade to crack the £100m net spend mark.
Because I felt like it. Leicester have spent more than Blackburn on their Premier League winning squad. Would you say they vastly outspend Walker's Blackburn? Chelsea's spending in relation to the rest of the league at the time was higher than City's spending in relation to the rest of the league at the time. That's all.Don't know why you are bringing Utd & Arsenal into it. My point was that 3 teams have bought the league & they have all in turn outspent each other. City aare currently the highest spenders in the PL era.
Leicester have spent more than Blackburn on their Premier League winning squad. Would you say they vastly outspend Walker's Blackburn? Chelsea's spending in relation to the rest of the league at the time was higher than City's spending in relation to the rest of the league at the time. .
3 titles in 4 years, great achievement.
I must admit i thought they would struggle to make top 4 when they had that abysmal start to the season. But another league title and a CL final, hats off to them.
I was genuinely congratulating them.
The comment about me rather seeing them win it than United was a bit cheeky but don't hate me for being honest. You'd rather they win things than us right?
Interesting take but I don’t think FSG are necessarily any better for the game than City’s owners are. The recent Super League debacle shows that.I used to. Now I think the ownership model they have is a real threat to the game, and I would rather that teams that are either fan-owned, or that run like actual businesses, rather than state-owned propped up entities, succeed.
Football tribalism is a fun part of the game and Liverpool fans are especially funny when their team is going through a bad season, but some things are more important.
When United lost to Leicester Sky switched to the Etihad Stadium to see City fans celebrating. There were barely half-a-dozen supporters there and they looked disinterested. The blues supporters passion is inspiring.
Incredible. Has to be a wind up?