Still doesn't make maguire a crap signing or a deadwood.Pep has done a horrible job at picking CB's for city so far.
Still doesn't make maguire a crap signing or a deadwood.Pep has done a horrible job at picking CB's for city so far.
No but his performances do.Still doesn't make maguire a crap signing or a deadwood.
No his performance so far has not been crap. Just because he has not fulfilled his 80m price tag doesn't make him one.No but his performances do.
...while before the signing I knew that he was outstanding in 2 things — heading the ball away and moving it forward (via passing or dribbling).
Pep has done a horrible job at picking CB's for city so far.
I think he has consistently proved himself in the first department: he is very good at winning aerial duels - and also at reading situations where winning those duels is beneficial (pushing up from a deeper position to engage players in order to snuff out danger). This is a very good trait of his - and one any team will benefit from.
The second department - no, he hasn't proved himself there, I agree. He has, occasionally, started attacks with mid- or long-range passes (decent ones) of the sort you don't fancy any of our other options to offer - but he hasn't incorporated this into his game as a feature which (frequently, regularly) benefits the team. This obviously has something to do with the way we normally play, though - he hasn't had ample opportunities to showcase his passing (one could say).
But he wasn't known as an outstanding player in terms of passing and/or moving the ball forward - he was known as someone who was good at it (unlike - to the make the most obvious example - Smalling). Which goes back to the original point: nobody (that I'm aware of) considered him a player who was worth a world record amount because of his ball playing skills, he didn't stand out in that respect as someone you'd be willing to pay a shitload for (because he was exceptionally good at it).
Maguire isn't exceptionally good at anything, really - and that shouldn't come as a surprise to anyone. That's my point, though - he kind of is what it said on the tin, only we paid an excessive amount for a decent tin of - dare I say - beanz.
Decent beans/beanz will do fine with excellent eggs, prime bacon, a nice sausage or two, first rate fried mushrooms, tomatoes - maybe even some black pudding, who knows, and...yeah, I'll stop there.
He has?
I think he has consistently proved himself in the first department: he is very good at winning aerial duels - and also at reading situations where winning those duels is beneficial (pushing up from a deeper position to engage players in order to snuff out danger). This is a very good trait of his - and one any team will benefit from.
The second department - no, he hasn't proved himself there, I agree. He has, occasionally, started attacks with mid- or long-range passes (decent ones) of the sort you don't fancy any of our other options to offer - but he hasn't incorporated this into his game as a feature which (frequently, regularly) benefits the team. This obviously has something to do with the way we normally play, though - he hasn't had ample opportunities to showcase his passing (one could say).
But he wasn't known as an outstanding player in terms of passing and/or moving the ball forward - he was known as someone who was good at it (unlike - to the make the most obvious example - Smalling). Which goes back to the original point: nobody (that I'm aware of) considered him a player who was worth a world record amount because of his ball playing skills, he didn't stand out in that respect as someone you'd be willing to pay a shitload for (because he was exceptionally good at it).
Maguire isn't exceptionally good at anything, really - and that shouldn't come as a surprise to anyone. That's my point, though - he kind of is what it said on the tin, only we paid an excessive amount for a decent tin of - dare I say - beanz.
Decent beans/beanz will do fine with excellent eggs, prime bacon, a nice sausage or two, first rate fried mushrooms, tomatoes - maybe even some black pudding, who knows, and...yeah, I'll stop there.
I brought this up a while back and got laughed at because first and foremost he’s a centre back .I'd say Maguire's finishing has been his biggest disappointing factor for me, in an England shirt or last season you feel like he'd have buried his chances he's fluffed for us, and he's had plenty of great ones. Just adds to the feeling the clubs cursed.
This place is just amateur tacticians cherry-picking and complaining about non-existent problems with extreme short term bias.
Maguire is fine, look further up field for issues.
I'd say Maguire's finishing has been his biggest disappointing factor for me, in an England shirt or last season you feel like he'd have buried his chances he's fluffed for us, and he's had plenty of great ones. Just adds to the feeling the clubs cursed.
Not long ago they were slating Rashford. As soon as a player makes a mistake, you ll see them spouting "shite".This 100% there are bitter people on here looking to pile on to every player in every thread. With fans like these who needs enemies, he isn’t the issue and once he’s more settled in Manchester with his very young family he’ll improve further.
By the way, even here I have a slight issue with him — his aerial presence during set pieces on both sides of the pitch was really unimpressive. I don't have huge concerns about it though, this I can explain by his form/partners/adjusting to a new team & our horrible set piece tactics. He's very good at reading those situations and clearing them out in an open play though.I think he has consistently proved himself in the first department: he is very good at winning aerial duels - and also at reading situations where winning those duels is beneficial (pushing up from a deeper position to engage players in order to snuff out danger). This is a very good trait of his - and one any team will benefit from.
But back to Maguire. Compare to Van Dijk. Maguire doesn’t has that dominant presence and aura by him. You can see it with Van Dijk. A majestic aura of a CB. You can see Van Dijk is a dominant CB, even he is not touching the ball. Same with Stam and Lucio. Or Zidane and Cantona in midfield. Maguire is lacking that dominant presence. Special for CB. You can easily see it. Winners and world class players who are tall use to have it. It goes hand in hand. A athlete body of a god and beast.
So hopefully Maguire will show more of dominance presence. A fear factor and show that you are the boss and own the pitch out there. Maguire hasn’t been to shy so far. Bring out the beast in him, of a CB. And for world record for a CB. I can expect the dominance and fear factor presence from him. Sign of a true leader and winner. You can see clearly Lindelof doesn’t has it. But for some, they just have it.
Before he came here, most would have expected him to be absolutely imperious in the air, as he seemed to be for Leicester and England and a genuine, constant goal threat on set pieces. He was also expected to be positionally sound in both control of his line and in covering his own back in terms of his lack of pace.I think he has consistently proved himself in the first department: he is very good at winning aerial duels - and also at reading situations where winning those duels is beneficial (pushing up from a deeper position to engage players in order to snuff out danger). This is a very good trait of his - and one any team will benefit from.
The second department - no, he hasn't proved himself there, I agree. He has, occasionally, started attacks with mid- or long-range passes (decent ones) of the sort you don't fancy any of our other options to offer - but he hasn't incorporated this into his game as a feature which (frequently, regularly) benefits the team. This obviously has something to do with the way we normally play, though - he hasn't had ample opportunities to showcase his passing (one could say).
But he wasn't known as an outstanding player in terms of passing and/or moving the ball forward - he was known as someone who was good at it (unlike - to the make the most obvious example - Smalling). Which goes back to the original point: nobody (that I'm aware of) considered him a player who was worth a world record amount because of his ball playing skills, he didn't stand out in that respect as someone you'd be willing to pay a shitload for (because he was exceptionally good at it).
Maguire isn't exceptionally good at anything, really - and that shouldn't come as a surprise to anyone. That's my point, though - he kind of is what it said on the tin, only we paid an excessive amount for a decent tin of - dare I say - beanz.
Decent beans/beanz will do fine with excellent eggs, prime bacon, a nice sausage or two, first rate fried mushrooms, tomatoes - maybe even some black pudding, who knows, and...yeah, I'll stop there.
The trend is rampant throughout football now with anyone & their dog posting on social media. For the most part they really don't have a sufficient knowledge of whats happening on the pitch to make a meaningful comment. My biggest issue with it is the garbage press sift through Twitter & find five comments that a certain player is crap & they then make that into a story. I think Maguire has been on the positive side of OK but just not fantastic.Not long ago they were slating Rashford. As soon as a player makes a mistake, you ll see them spouting "shite".
Thing is most of them are clueless knee jerkers or Twitter thrash. They come over here and infest all the threads with the same drivel. Sad lot.
I think we are trying to protect him being so bloody deep. Mctominay has shielded our defense before too.
Yeah I would not blame him much for not scoring any goals from corners. We don't put the balls in well enough and also seem to lack a good plan to open space for our best headers. Some of our short corners have at least been slightly better though.
He's not, De Gea is!He will be a victim of the stupid price tag, just like Pogba and all the others in years gone by.
He's not set the world alight, but he isn't losing us games regularly on his own and that is a fact.
You use full stops in place of commas. And throw in some more anyway. You are completely correct with everything you said. Best post. In this thread.Jonny Evans looks like a 80 £ mill CB for Leicester this season. Maguire is not so much better than Evans. It just show Maguire is not a key to top 4. Evans and Soy are doing it for Leicester now. Wrong move this summer. Wasn’t willy to spend a bit more for Bruno Fernandes. Went for Dybala abd Eriksen in the end. End up with none new quality creative player. The key and biggest difference of top 4. Not enough creative qualities to open up tight defenders.
Smalling and Jones more than good enough for top 4. So a bit domino effect. Wrong choices lead to another. Spending time on CB and Nr.10. Got the CB, but failed to get nr.10. Leading United on a struggling path against tight defenders.
But if the club get a top nr.8, 10 and RW. This January and summer. Then the chance to get top 4 or better will rise. 3 or maybe 4 top or quality signings. Depend United showing as a really good football team until summer transfer window. It will cover over last summer poor decision. Spend 60-80 mill £ on a nr.8 or 10 instead.
And if Ole get a new chances and time to get the right players. Then it is not because him is the right manager. Ole get lucky and time to buying him success. More of a buying manager, then compare Arsene Wenger who turned Henry to one of the best striker in Premier league history. Wenger was really good to develop players. But his time has to come to and end too.
But back to Maguire. Compare to Van Dijk. Maguire doesn’t has that dominant presence and aura by him. You can see it with Van Dijk. A majestic aura of a CB. You can see Van Dijk is a dominant CB, even he is not touching the ball. Same with Stam and Lucio. Or Zidane and Cantona in midfield. Maguire is lacking that dominant presence. Special for CB. You can easily see it. Winners and world class players who are tall use to have it. It goes hand in hand. A athlete body of a god and beast.
So hopefully Maguire will show more of dominance presence. A fear factor and show that you are the boss and own the pitch out there. Maguire hasn’t been to shy so far. Bring out the beast in him, of a CB. And for world record for a CB. I can expect the dominance and fear factor presence from him. Sign of a true leader and winner. You can see clearly Lindelof doesn’t has it. But for some, they just have it.
Ball Hogba.
He's not as bad as Ball Hogba.
His task is to move the team up the pitch when there is space on that side. It makes the then short pass to Shaw put him in a good position on the left side.
He's not as bad as Ball Hogba.
His task is to move the team up the pitch when there is space on that side. It makes the then short pass to Shaw put him in a good position on the left side.
Blind was miles better than HM.He is probably our best defender since Rio who is good at controlling the ball under pressure and carrying it forward. However, it is blatantly obvious that he lack confidence in his passing. His long pass is almost non-existent.
Brilliant Post. We may see the best of Maguire alongside prime breakfast staples. However, let's pray our transfer strategy isn't just a full English. Some Chorizo would be nice .
Just here to join the chorus:He's not as bad as Ball Hogba.
Did you find my school report?Poor reading
Slow in thought
Poor lad