Conte won't give up until he gets Lukaku same as Zidane won't give up on Pogba. I just hope we don't get caught out with getting replacements if they go in the last couple of days.
Well if we bid 70m for Maguire... Skriniar is probably a better player
Low maintenance? It’s changing a thread title. This is what happens when there is a significant update within a thread, so people know there’s a reason to enter it other than to read idle gossip.For the second time yeah. Transfer speculation is more low maintenance and still accurate
I don't think we'll sell if we don't have time to get a replacement. I think we have priced out both of these players. Pogba is pretty much staying at this point. I won't mind if Lukaku stays too if Inter can't pay up.Conte won't give up until he gets Lukaku same as Zidane won't give up on Pogba. I just hope we don't get caught out with getting replacements if they go in the last couple of days.
I guess I'm wrong because it is worded wrong in the first one - probably they mean 4th worst from the forwards as usually GKs and CBs don't run as much as other positions. Still very very bad, even if Martial was worse, who by the way I'm not excusing for not applying himself better on the pitch.If 278th makes him 4th worst I apologise. If not, you are wrong. Also Martial did cover less distance so you’re wrong there.
I'd love Brozovic, a good midfield option for us.He's probably not though. He's a 40 million player max for me, but wildly over rated on the Caf for some reason. If he's worth 70 then United need to be getting in excess of 120 million for Lukaku.
Who's the worst?Lukaku was 4th worst in the whole PL in distance covered per 90 minutes. Says it all.
I repeat - 4th worst.
Couldn't find anything recent mate, sorry. Not many sites provide distance covered per 90 minutes, actually I don't think any do and it's mostly researches done for articles.Who's the worst?
Thank's for the effort. Was just curiousCouldn't find anything recent mate, sorry. Not many sites provide distance covered per 90 minutes, actually I don't think any do and it's mostly researches done for articles.
Joke of an offer that. Pay up or shut up. Your manager has essentially said you need Lukaku, whats the point of offers like that at this stage of the window?
I want us to be smart, our forward line is inconsistent and he should only leave when we find an adequate replacement. He is still a striker who can score 20plus goals in a season in a proper creative team behind him. Cafe's view of him being completely useless is not true in my opinion. We have our own goals to full fill next season.
It's a myth he's worth 20 goals a season, he's done it once for Everton.
He ruins the pattern of play and after watching the way Ole has set the team up so far in preseason he doesn't fit in, he's shattered after a sprint.
If you insist on only using league goals then you are correct.
Otherwise he posted 20-25-26 in his last three everton seasons..and 27 in his first season for us.
That article can’t be trusted...it says he has exemplary hold-up play.Lukaku was 4th worst in the whole PL in distance covered per 90 minutes. Says it all.
I repeat - 4th worst.
You're letting your dislike of him cloud your judgment.This just isint true, of course we want rid of him, we are just being subtle and respectful about it. It’s a good approach, unlike Inter with Icardi. Ultimately if Inter don’t buy him, there’s no one else who would, so we are stuck with him - but it’s clear he’s both not good enough for Utd and not in OGS’ plans.
And we finished 2nd in Lukaku's first season after finishing outside the top 4 the previous season. What's your point?Everton’s final season with Lukaku:
Finished 11th, 47 pts with +4 GD.
Everton’s first season without Lukaku:
Finished 7th, 61 pts with +18 GD.
There's a certain system that suits him best but it's not a system Manchester United should be playing.
I've never seen him dominate a defender or create something from nothing, his general play is garbage, plays always break down around him.
Of all the strikers United have had over the years for me he's at the bottom of the pile just above Sanchez. Selling him is progress.
So we've rejected a bid of £54m? Hope our brinkmanship pays off because we desperately need to offload him.
Brinkmanship? It's not even that, it's not being absolutely rinsed beyond belief.
We just signed a right back for 50m, so we can't be shipping the 2nd top scoring Premier league striker in the last 6-8 years for similar.
You're letting your dislike of him cloud your judgment.
This line of thought is utterly crazy
a- No one gives a flying feck how much we spent on AWB. Apart maybe Leicester fans.
b- we bought AWB on mostly potential. By the looks of it, he's worth every penny as he does have all the skillset to become a top top RB. You can't say the same about Lukaku and Maguire both of whom have clear flaws in their game that won't allow them to become WC.
He seemed to be quite close with pogba and I wonder if he was a bad influence on him.
It was all bromance at the start, but seems to have totally disappeared the last season or so.
There seemed to be these little groups within the squad and I wonder if they used to egg each other on and stuff on the pitch. Say yes to the managers whilst discussing the total opposite behind closed doors when with one another. It wouldn't surprise me and it would explain a lot. Maybe it is very sensible to break these little groups and create a better environment.It was all bromance at the start, but seems to have totally disappeared the last season or so.
It's not crazy at all. The whole transfer market is based on comparisons.
City took full back fees to 50m, that's why we're paying that high for AWB.
Liverpool signing matey for 75m means Leicester are asking above that.
Sell Lukaku for 50m, and we'll be utter mugs, and find we'll be quoted lesser players for more.
Lukaku will probably go. But it'll certainly be for more money.
I didn't disagree with that. I'm just stating that we're not actively shifting him like we have been with DarmianNo. It’s very clear he only wants to go because he’s been told he won’t be a first team player and he doesn’t fit in at Utd.
He's certainly not got the all round game of a lot of our recent strikers. That's without any doubt.
He does follow an alarming line of players whose games have dipped after joining us.
I'm struggling to think of a last 6 years signing that has actually played better than we expected.
Martial had an initial burst, but then for his fee we were perhaps expecting wonder kid material anyway.
Either way, we can't be shipping him for 50 odd million. That just is silly.
So we've rejected a bid of £54m? Hope our brinkmanship pays off because we desperately need to offload him.
Simply they just can’t afford him and are trying to see if there is any way we’d do buisness.That was a shockingly low bid from Inter. It's not even close to what we want. Any chance Inter don't actually want him but, Conte does? This bid would represent that. "Yup, we tried to sign him, as evidenced by our bid to United. Just didn't work out. Sorry Conte!"
Oh, so it's like Arsenal's bid for Zaha, then.Simply they just can’t afford him and are trying to see if there is any way we’d do buisness.