Ban
New Member
That was a really, really short time.He did used to play out wide. He was a wide attacker when he first came on the scene
That was a really, really short time.He did used to play out wide. He was a wide attacker when he first came on the scene
No he didn't, he played about half a season for spurs as left winger and that was it. For Croatia he always played as CM, and for Dinamo he played as attacking midfielder.
He did used to play out wide. He was a wide attacker when he first came on the scene
I didnt say anything about Spurs
At Dinamo he played as a ACM or a wide playerOk, you will really need to help me with this one. In Bosnia with Zrinjski, on loan in Inter or when he finally got a chance and took midfield of Dinamo Zagreb?
He did, that was 12 years ago. So what's the point exactly?At Dinamo he played as a ACM or a wide player
He did, that was 12 years ago. So what's the point exactly?
Thats obvious, he was a wide player back then. But I'm not sure where are you going with it. No need to be smug.The point being what I said. He was a wide player when ge first came on the scene. Reading is advised on a forum, no point arguing with people when you dont even know what they were saying in the first place
At Dinamo he played as a ACM or a wide player
Thats obvious, he was a wide player back then. But I'm not sure where are you going with it. No need to be smug.
By the time he went to Dinamo, he was by far the biggest Croatian talent in the last 10 or more years. He was already the best player in the league the year before and he never once played on the wing or as wide player during that time.
For Zrinjski he played CM, for Inter AM. The only reason why he played for a brief period of time (part of his first season) as a wide player for Dinamo is that there was a bigger name at AM in his first year there (Silvio Maric), so he was shunted from his preferred position.
All his biggest games in Europe came when he played centrally and after the first year, he never went back to that position. He simply was never seen as a wide player. So, he came to the scene, domestically as a midfielder and in the same position he made his name known to European clubs.
My initial reaction was to the post who claimed like his failings on the wing show some kind of shortcomings compared to Iniesta (I'm not even going into the whole debate who is better, just that initial claim). Even if we say that is partly true looking at his time at Spurs, it is almost like pointing at Scholes and not so great games he had as a winger for England. Modric isn't a wide player.
Not true but ok
Sorry if there was an old thread, but what a performance from him.
He's not had a great season, but boy did he turn up in the final.
Been the best CM since Xavi has waned imo.
Which part and we will finish there.
The part where he didnt play outwide of course
Yeh I think so too. Modric is more mobile, has better shot, and with similar passing vision.He's better than Xavi imo
He plays as 1 of 2 CMs next to a DM. He also used to play our wide just like Iniesta was used there. He is simply less productive.
So you're emphasizing his first season at Spurs when he played on the wing but conveniently forgetting that next 3 seasons he played in double pivot next to Palacios and later Parker without DM behind them.
At Real Madrid he played in double pivot under Mourinho. Under Ancelotti he played RCM in 3 man midfield, double pivot when they were playing 4-4-2 and CDM at times. Under Zidane he played RCM only.
That's what I call productive. Total midfielder.
You are bad at reading. Try again
You never seen us play? We attack entirely through the wings. Also Kroos doesn't play deep for us, usually it's Modric who plays deeper, with Casemiro. Modric is often the deepest of the 3 in factHow many 'organisers' do Madrid have? Casemiero sits deep. We all know Kroos plays deep. Modric also apparently has turned into some Busquets type organising DLP now. I'm surprised that team won anything given everyone is apparently sat in their own half.
Great player. 4th or 5th best midfielder I've seen.
Not really, that was just one match due to Alonso's suspension, Khedira was a bench player.He won the UCL playing in midfield with Khediera and DiMaria
He won the UCL playing in midfield with Khediera and DiMaria
Will he ever be considered for Ballon d'Or in the same Xavi/Iniesta were? Should be the year...but what a bonkers year for the Ballon d'Or, Messi could potentially at this point drop out of the top 3.
Khedira was a bench player that season. Alonso was suspended in the final.
And Di Maria has his best ever season that season. He was Real's 3rd most important player that year.
He played as a right midfielder even this season in a few games.When was that? If the answer is Spurs don't bother replying, you really don't know what you're talking about in this thread.
This. At times we've even used Casemiro to drive forward with the ball as teams tend to leave him free when he doesn't have the ball. And he's really good on the ball when he has timeCasemiro usually plays deeper without the ball but he’s often the most advanced midfielder during the build up since he’s not good enough on the ball
Also injured for half the season. Lucky for us as Khedira was a starter before the injuryNot really, that was just one match due to Alonso's suspension, Khedira was a bench player.
Not really, he had a great season overall. Was our second best player and arguably the most importantFor 6 months
In makeshift lineupsHe played as a right midfielder even this season in a few games.
He played as a right midfielder even this season in a few games.
I'm talking about what hes currently doing. I talked about him playing next to Alonso and taking over, before being moved into a 3 man midfield with Casemiro in there to be more solid, just as Busquets is there for Barcelona.
Woah that is actually a possibility and how weird would that be!
Top 3 Ballon d'Or candidates:
1) Ronaldo
2) Salah
3) Modric/Messi?
Iniesta is 1 year older then Modric.
Last 4 seasons he played 105 league games, had 8 assists and scored 2 goals in that period. Talk about being productive..
Ok I'll quote 'Iniesta took some time to finally produce in the final third, but managed several seasons where he assisted and scored over 10 goals. His most productive being 19 combined.
Modric has never been over 8. He's usually come up with 6.'
Maybe you are bad at writing, when you say he managed to assist and score over 10 goals several seasons, you are saying he managed to get at least 10 goals and 10 assists in several seasons. Yet he hasn't scored 10 goals in a season not even once.
If what you meant is that he got over 10 goals/assists combined in a season, that is hardly a great achievement for a player who plays in Barcelona in an offensive role.
Modic in Madrid plays a lot deeper as an organizer, and still has managed tomdo that in 3 of the 6 seasons in Madrid.
In Tottenham he managed to do that in 3 of the 4 seasons he was there.
And in Dynamo Zagreb, where he played in a more offensive rola (like Iniesta) he managed to get 17 goals and 14 assists in a season.
So please, explain your point...