broccoli
Full Member
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2014
- Messages
- 3,127
- Supports
- FCPorto
For me a superior player to Xavi, at least more more complete.
For me a superior player to Xavi, at least more more complete.
The best European midfielder of the 21st century, for me. The level and sheer consistency he’s reached in the last 3-4 years has been staggering.
Nah he is wonderful but Xavi and Inesta are different gravyModric > Iniesta > Xavi, for me.
Think Rakitic has been even better today.
He never does even though he performs well every time in the finals and the run up to the finals.Will he ever be considered for Ballon d'Or in the same Xavi/Iniesta were? Should be the year...but what a bonkers year for the Ballon d'Or, Messi could potentially at this point drop out of the top 3.
For me a superior player to Xavi, at least more more complete.
Here’s a thought. Who’s better when both are at their best, Modric or Scholes?
Nah he is wonderful but Xavi and Inesta are different gravy
We wanted him here. Shame reallySo what was the Caf's general consensus on Modric when he was at Spurs?
I’d have loved him here when he left spurs so I definitely thought he was a tidy player back then. Completely elevated his performances since then though. One of the few players in the world who I just expect to be great when I watch them and I can’t remember him disappointing. Gutted we didn’t get him.So what was the Caf's general consensus on Modric when he was at Spurs?
So what was the Caf's general consensus on Modric when he was at Spurs?
Here’s a thought. Who’s better when both are at their best, Modric or Scholes?
Rijkaard?They are. They're both half Modric. Modric is two of them combined and a bit of Busquets.
Never there has been a more complete midfielder then him.