Member 101269
Guest
I wonder where Liverpool got their money from
Even fecking Raul Meireles looked like a player and started in Liverpool and ChelseaIt's quite obvious that he's excellent - anyone who even casually watches football here would tell you he's the best player in the country. Whilst I do agree that buying someone who's done well in the league here but been poor in Europe can be risky, I don't necessarily think that applies when going after the guy who is comfortably the best player.
forgetting the icon that is Ramires!!
I wonder where Liverpool got their money from
Even fecking Raul Meireles looked like a player and started in Liverpool and Chelsea
Ehh but what do I know just because your a good player in Portugal it does not mean you are good in the trenches of the EPL. Thank god these guys don’t gotta play in a rainy night in stoke on a Tuesday then they would really be fecked.
Definitely none of those players was great not even in Portugal, Gedson only was good for Portugal Youth teams, Tavares has technical limitations. I don't think Diaz will hit the ground running on the short term, but after 6 months under Klopp and already adapted to a new league he has the tools to be a good player for Liverpool. How good? I don't know.I think it's fair to say though that buying an average player in Portugal is possibly a bad idea (e.g. Nuno Tavares, Gedson Fernandes, etc.), but that's very different to buying the best player in the country.
Definitely none of those players was great not even in Portugal, Gedson only was good for Portugal Youth teams, Tavares has technical limitations. I don't think Diaz will hit the ground running on the short term, but after 6 months under Klopp and already adapted to a new league he has the tools to be a good player for Liverpool. How good? I don't know.
Why do people think he is a backup or replacement for Salah? Doesn't he play on the other side and is right footed?
Both Luis Diaz and Fabio Carvalho are left wingers/left sided forwards.
They can play anywhere in the front, but primarily operate on left.
It's a clear indication that Mane will most probably be moved on in the summer.
What money? We spend like fecking paupers. Even with this signing.I wonder where Liverpool got their money from
What money? We spend like fecking paupers. Even with this signing.
Hopefully outside England. PSG would ensure big cash.Where is he expected to go? PSG with Mbappe gone? Only other club outside of England that I can think of is Juve to replace Dybala if he goes.
you are paupers, 50m is a lot.I wonder where is came from. I’m looking forward to seeing the 2021 accounts which aren’t out yet
Both Luis Diaz and Fabio Carvalho are left wingers/left sided forwards.
They can play anywhere in the front, but primarily operate on left.
It's a clear indication that Mane will most probably be moved on in the summer.
He's a right footed left winger. He's pretty clearly a replacement for Mane - but as someone who's comfortable as the main attacking outlet, I suppose it's conceivable that in 3 years' time he might have assumed Salah's mantle as the main channel for Liverpool's attacks?
Hopefully outside England. PSG would ensure big cash.
If you are implying about breaching FFP, then Liverpool are allowed to spend 243 million according to FFP.
If you are wondering about actual cash, then the club has it. Maybe not the same as City Or Chelsea, but it has it. The owners are just not known to splash it.
We also tend to do structured deals.
I also don't know how much of Grujic money is still owed to LFC.
The club might also make some sales today. But that's a big if.
They bought the club for 300m. Today it has an estimated worth of 3bn. Yet they still plead that there is just no way to inject cash.the borrowed 140m in the year end 2020, 2021 accounts are not out. I’m not sure how you can conclude they have the cash
That's with add-ons and all.Sky Sports have the deal at £49m
Not cheap at all really
That's with add-ons and all.
Regardless, not a bargain shop purchase but if he delivers I am happy with the fee. It's a good going rate for a forward you expect to become a starter.
He's 30 in a few months and his contract runs out next summer, not forgetting his dwindling performances throughout the past year or so. How much do you think you can feasibly get for him?Hopefully outside England. PSG would ensure big cash.
I think maybe for the hype it is but for me it seems like a good price for comfortably the best player in the league. I don’t think Bruno was much more.Yes I agree. This is the kind of signing you should try and make.
I’ve seen some trying to paint this as a cut price deal though which it certainly isn’t. It’s big money.
Every time Liverpool sign a player, the Fee is ££££ (very rarely the add ons are mentioned)That's with add-ons and all.
Regardless, not a bargain shop purchase but if he delivers I am happy with the fee. It's a good going rate for a forward you expect to become a starter.
On paper it maybe worth 3b, but no way are they ever going to sell it for that much. They will probably be using the paper value to re finance and use the money for their own projects. Any lose change they give to Klopp to paper over the cracks.They bought the club for 300m. Today it has an estimated worth of 3bn. Yet they still plead that there is just no way to inject cash.
A baller. Flair. Really good one on one. No mood player. Playing under a super energetic manager in Klopp. Who push that max out of the player. With Diaz already high winning and fighting mentality.
A player full of guts, determination + a manager full of guts and passion. Liverpool max full philosophy will get the max out of him. And when Diaz is on the max, speed, determination, flair and top ball control. On his max level. This is a player i will love to watch and will enjoy to watch. Luis Diaz is a baller.
40 mill £ plus add on is a good price. Its maybe Tottenham and Conte that are trying to get Luis Diaz in this transfer window. Why and maybe Liverpool and Klopp had to act and buy him now. If not not maybe Klopp will wait for him in this summer.
Compare him as attacking player and winger. I like him more than Jack Grealish. The total packet and end product of Luis Diaz is better than Grealish. So again 100 £ mill for Grealish. 40 £ mill plus add on is a really really good deal for any club that get Diaz. At this moment. Equal good as Grealish.
But i am glad Diaz best role is Mane position or maybe as CF like Jota or Firminio. So it mean Klopp has to drop or rotate one of Mane or Jota. And Mane is really good too. Same as Jota. Not sure how much they will strenght. But for the squad depth, like City. Definitely a quality and really good winger and attacking player.
Again. Diaz is a baller. He has the explosiveness, which make him really good one on one. Drive, passion and engine. Combine with a winning and beast mode mentality. He will definitely handle the pace, intensity of premier league. Dont worry about his speed, intensity and physical
He's 30 in a few months and his contract runs out next summer, not forgetting his dwindling performances throughout the past year or so. How much do you think you can feasibly get for him?
That's my main beef with them. There was a unique position to build from a position of dominance. Instead they have seen that Klopp will always secure top four and have them thereabouts, so why bother spending more than they absolutely have to? He's getting wenger'd.On paper it maybe worth 3b, but no way are they ever going to sell it for that much. They will probably be using the paper value to re finance and use the money for their own projects. Any lose change they give to Klopp to paper over the cracks.
They bought the club for 300m. Today it has an estimated worth of 3bn. Yet they still plead that there is just no way to inject cash.
On paper it maybe worth 3b, but no way are they ever going to sell it for that much. They will probably be using the paper value to re finance and use the money for their own projects. Any lose change they give to Klopp to paper over the cracks.
Sky Sports have the deal at £49m
Not cheap at all really
Bournemouth?
I think it's because he had a higher release clause. Porto had to sell due to financial issues apparently which is why he went for less than that.Yes I agree. This is the kind of signing you should try and make.
I’ve seen some trying to paint this as a cut price deal though which it certainly isn’t. It’s big money.