Ireland kicking ass tonight. Rushida-like performance in the 800m from McKillop.
Bit of a hullabaloo in the 200m tonight when the big favourite, our man Oscar, got beat. He's claiming his opponent used longer blades. Could get messy. One thing everyone says about Pretorius is that he's a gent who is always gracious to his opponents, so he must have good reason to complain methinks.
What's the deal with those blades? I know Pistorius had a long battle to compete in the Olympics with his blades, but in the Paralympics is there any restriction on the length of the blades you can use? I guess there must be i.e. you can't be wearing any that would make you 8' tall.
Paralympics are great, and I've nothing but admiration for all the athletes, but I do think it's impossible to make it completely fair in a lot of the events. Only the wheelchair sports or the blind sports are on a level playing field really.
A very lightly trafficked thread, why is that?
I have to admit I haven't been following the Paralymics at all. We tried to get tickets to the stadium because we wanted to see inside it but there were none left. It's not that I'm actively disinterested in them it's more that I'm not particularly interested, if that makes sense.
That Pistorius thing where he went through all the effort of pitting his springs against muscle & bone & now he's complaining that someone has bigger springs than him.
I must admit that I was the same has you at first, but after watching it I am glad I did there is some fantastic athletes in it.
Anyone should be watching as much as possible, as practicable as possible. It's once in a life time experience for sure. These athletes deserve alot of our respect because of the hurdles and difficulties they experience to get where they are now. It's very emotional watching them though so be warned. They inspire people showing everything is possible if you put your minds and efforts at it.
Can't agree more with sir Mathew's tweet regarding Oscar P
"@matthewcpinsent: Oscar has to choose - either he was beaten fair and square by a better athlete or blade design CAN radically affect your performance level."
Saw some tonight- is good stuff but can border on the bizarre. The British archer who won had a right old rack on her, one of the swimmers who won gold was a dead spit of Rebecca Adlington and on a side note, the blind football was peculiar. They never pass, just go on mad dribbles all the time and loads of fouls in the game.
The Russian who run the winning last leg in the women's cerebral palsy 4x100m relay final was actually quite fit. Not a sentence you type every day.
Why does he have to choose? Those two statements are not mutually exclusive as far as I can see.
Did Pistorious ever say that blade design has no impact on performance?
I must say as a South African and Oscar fan, I was disappointed in his remarks. Sure he's apologised for them, but prosthesis experts have since said longer blades actually make it tougher to run as you need put more energy into them. One of the experts makes the blades for the athletes and she said that it is made according to your 'natural' leg profile. So it is not 'out of proportion'.
Oscar was simply beaten by a younger upcoming talent. He can't win forever and he needs to accept that and move on.
Oh and PS: Sir Matthew's tweet doesn't hold up. Oscar was questioned by able bodied athletes arguing his blades gave him an advantage over them. So to be fair to Oscar, this situation is different. Remember the court ruled in Oscar's favour after several tests and expert testimony showing the design of his blades gave him no unfair advantage.
I think there are special websites for people like you...
The wheelchair basketballer is a very good presenter from what I've seen.
Balding's been good in both Olympic games.