Locking threads

Dubai_Devil said:
He was not trying to get himself banned, if he wanted to be banned he would have gone out in a blaze of glory so to speak, not for 'causing trouble', which I am still not sure exactly where it occurred.

But I do appreciate a proper response, thanks.

It's like everything in life - opinions differ. Half the posters here think he's great, and half think he's a shit stirrer.

Him having the other forum was never the problem. People can post in as many forums as they want to, but there seems to be a definite intent to destroy this one in the process. Thread after thread, post after post, complaining about something the mods have done - inciting everyone. Well we might not always get it right - who does - but we don't always get it wrong either.

Then you get the hypocrites who actually ask us to ban people because they are perceived as muppets or whatever. People constantly whinging about the quality of posts in the General, newbies picked on and basically bullied because they aren't seen as good enough to be part of the clique. If we banned some of those poor sods, no-one would give a stuff because just lately here it's not a forum for everyone - it's a forum for those who fit in.
 
WeasteDevil said:
You are the one repeatedly banging on about it when you have been given valid reasons umpteen times.

He's a grown man, if he wants to contest it, he can do so via email, without you having to look after him.

I've been told that he has been disruptive and sinister, as well as poaching posters from here for the other forum.

He can contest it if he wants to, that doesn't mean I can't ask about the reasons behind it. I don't see why you have such a problem with people questioning decisions.
 
Anyone that even contemplates defending a man who openly tells people "to go and rape a retarded child" in posts should think long and hard about themselves.....
 
livvie is hot. :drool:. I back the mods decision as a poster and congratulate them for their efforts...;)
 
Dubai_Devil said:
I've been told that he has been disruptive and sinister, as well as poaching posters from here for the other forum.

He can contest it if he wants to, that doesn't mean I can't ask about the reasons behind it. I don't see why you have such a problem with people questioning decisions.

You've asked about 89 times already! You will never be satisfied with the answer.
 
Livvie said:
It's like everything in life - opinions differ. Half the posters here think he's great, and half think he's a shit stirrer.

Him having the other forum was never the problem. People can post in as many forums as they want to, but there seems to be a definite intent to destroy this one in the process. Thread after thread, post after post, complaining about something the mods have done - inciting everyone. Well we might not always get it right - who does - but we don't always get it wrong either.

Then you get the hypocrites who actually ask us to ban people because they are perceived as muppets or whatever. People constantly whinging about the quality of posts in the General, newbies picked on and basically bullied because they aren't seen as good enough to be part of the clique. If we banned some of those poor sods, no-one would give a stuff because just lately here it's not a forum for everyone - it's a forum for those who fit in.

There has always been abuse and cliques on the Caf, newcomers have always been mocked, people like ManUtdRed and Cr7fan have been abused, but have come through and are better posters for it, that's the way the forum works. The only difference is now the mods are on the recieving end of a lot of the abuse, some of it is unfair, some of it you've brought on yourselves.

I know you have a lot to deal with on here, but the stricter you become, the more decisions you make on your own, the more this whole mods against others thing will get worse.
 
747346821_m.gif
 
Kristjan said:
you talk too much sense for this gang Livvie :)

And then I get responses like this, and you ask why there is a growing rift in the Caf.
 
Dubai_Devil said:
And then I get responses like this, and you ask why there is a growing rift in the Caf.

There is no rift, apart from certain members of the other place coming in here to cause problems and then fecking off and at no point posting anything else in the forum.

I'm glad to see that you have posted something about cricket.
 
Dubai_Devil said:
And then I get responses like this, and you ask why there is a growing rift in the Caf.

it wouldn't matter what we say as you obviously will keep harping on about it anyway shit stirrer
 
Diego Forlans Headband said:
And about 89 times you've given a crap answer so that is why he is asking. He's not the only one who wants to know.

No answer, crap or otherwise seems to be good for you. What do you want blood?
 
WeasteDevil said:
There is no rift, apart from certain members of the other place coming in here to cause problems and then fecking off and at no point posting anything else in the forum.

I'm glad to see that you have posted something about cricket.

I also posted something about paypal for Liv.

I thought Slabber was creating a rift in this forum. Slabber has always posted in threads and fecked off, how do you think he got 30k+ posts in two years?
 
Livvie said:
Him having the other forum was never the problem. People can post in as many forums as they want to, but there seems to be a definite intent to destroy this one in the process.

A little paranoid don't you think?
 
Dubai_Devil said:
I also posted something about paypal for Liv.

I thought Slabber was creating a rift in this forum. Slabber has always posted in threads and fecked off, how do you think he got 30k+ posts in two years?

Not by fecking off!
 
Kristjan said:
and does that satisfy the shit stirrers?
That's inciteful and disruptive.

Everyone loves Livvie - and there's a reason for it. Sultan, Geebs and Wibble too. 'Authority figures' but fair with it.
 
Some of you people are so fecking arrogent it's untrue. Is their no trust? Is there no love? They made a great decision an ethical decision and have the balls to put the site first before people that try and be detremental to it. It's obvious you want mods to kiss your ass but it ain't gonna happen. Well done mods
 
Kristjan said:
it wouldn't matter what we say as you obviously will keep harping on about it anyway shit stirrer

Now the name calling has started.

If I got a response which described what the 'disruptive' behaviour was then I wouldn't have to harp on about it, other than he posts and then fecks off.

I didn't question the Murderers banning because there was a clear reason behind it, I didn't question the Andy banning because there was a clear reason behind it. You see what i'm trying to say?
 
Striker10 said:
Some of you people are so fecking arrogent it's untrue. Is their no trust? Is there no love? They made a great decision an ethical decision and have the balls to put the site first before people that try and be detremental to it. It's obvious you want mods to kiss your ass but it ain't gonna happen. Well done mods
Ethical?

747346821_m.gif
 
Dubai_Devil said:
And then I get responses like this, and you ask why there is a growing rift in the Caf.

I think we have been on the end of so much shit lately, that we eventually develop a siege mentality and become defensive. Every single decision that's been made has been questioned and argued with. There's nothing wrong with arguing a case, but there's a way to do it, and I doubt that anyone of us would not be prepared to discuss privately any issue with a poster and sort it out amicably where possible, but it's just a constant barrage of snide comments and abuse.

People push buttons until they get a negative response, and then complain when they get it - but half the time it's exactly what they're looking for.
 
Dubai_Devil said:
I didn't question the Murderers banning because there was a clear reason behind it, I didn't question the Andy banning because there was a clear reason behind it. You see what i'm trying to say?

and there is a clear reason behind Slabber's banning you just don't want to see it
 
If he was causing mods or whoever hastle to get them to his site then it's unethical. Slabbers humor was based on the meanest thing he could say anyway, any mean fecker can do that. I'm not kissing the mods ass or anything but it's just fact alot of people think they're some God on the site when they're not
 
Mozza said:
A little paranoid don't you think?

I already said that in another thread. :)

Maybe. Maybe not. It's hard to tell when you see some of the things being said in public, and hear of things being said that aren't in public.
 
Livvie said:
I think we have been on the end of so much shit lately, that we eventually develop a siege mentality and become defensive. Every single decision that's been made has been questioned and argued with. There's nothing wrong with arguing a case, but there's a way to do it, and I doubt that anyone of us would not be prepared to discuss privately any issue with a poster and sort it out amicably where possible, but it's just a constant barrage of snide comments and abuse.

People push buttons until they get a negative response, and then complain when they get it - but half the time it's exactly what they're looking for.

I understand you being defensive, as I said some of the abuse you have gotten is unfair and some is warranted, I just would have thought some of you would be able to have some control over yourselves when it is obvious that I am not trying to be abusive or 'shit stir'.

The only decisions I have question is the Jason one, which I thought was silly and was probably right as he was soon reinstated, and this one.
 
Kristjan said:
and there is a clear reason behind Slabber's banning you just don't want to see it

If you want to point me to the specific threads in which these said disruptive posts have occurred it would help me see it.
 
Apart from anything else though, there are the constant sick posts that Slabber made about aids, about kids etc, which have offended a lot of people. As mods are we supposed to just ignore quite a high number of complaints?
 
Livvie said:
Apart from anything else though, there are the constant sick posts that Slabber made about aids about kids, which have offended a lot of people. As mods are we supposed to just ignore quite a high number of complaints?

Yes, but he's been doing that for a while, and was ghosted a few days ago for doing that recently, so you can't really use it as an excuse.

Plus there is also the fact of the reasons behind what he says and the people he says it to but that's a whole other argument which I don't really want to get into.
 
WeasteDevil said:
Do a search Dubai!

It would make more sense for a mod to post it up for me, you would obviously know where to look seeing it was the reason why he was banned.
 
I have always had a huge amount of time for Slabber. To the point where I have pm'd him or quietly deleted some of his posts when he has quite clearly gone OTT. Whilst argumentative and abusive, even if it was often in a Blackadder "I hope your Mother dies in a freak yachting accident" style, his intellect and hatred for prejudice and injustice usually shone through and more than negated all of the negatives.

In recent months the positives have just about gone. Which is very sad IMO. I would prefer he was here calling me a cockbiscuit but his banning at some point was almost inevitable it would seem. Even yesterday if he had backed off and let things lie he would be still here.
 
Wibble said:
I have always had a huge amount of time for Slabber. To the point where I have pm'd him or quietly deleted some of his posts when he has quite clearly gone OTT. Whilst argumentative and abusive, even if it was often in a Blackadder "I hope your Mother dies in a freak yachting accident" style, his intellect and hatred for prejudice and injustice usually shone through and more than negated all of the negatives.

In recent months the positives have just about gone. Which is very sad IMO. I would prefer he was here calling me a cockbiscuit but his banning at some point was almost inevitable it would seem. Even yesterday if he had backed off and let things lie he would be still here.

Fair enough Wibs, but you can't honestly say that he started things last night. You can't really blame him for defending himself can you.

I'll call you cockbiscuit if you'd like.
 
You should thank god i'm not a mod, i'd have banned jason, slabber and the prat that claims to molest poltry not gonna say his name i'm too much of a chicken (get it?)...and i'd have enjoyed it too :D . Give the mods a break, slobbers probally typing his details in as we speak in some backstreet cybercafe.