- Joined
- Mar 13, 2016
- Messages
- 227
- Supports
- Liverpool
Henry should have won when nedved won it.
Nah Nedved was better
Henry choked it big time in Europe.
Henry should have won when nedved won it.
Wolves were unlucky the other day at Anfield.
I love it. Then everyone wonders how!? How the fecking feck sake are LFC doing it?! Long may this continue, or long enough to get 21 titles before someone revisits that 'unlucky Wolves game' without the blinkers.
Anfield factor right? Let you down for 30 years but the factor is BACK. Back with a bang eh?
They never once went behind a match past the 80th minute in the league so they did something right. No late staged comebacks, and very few equalisers conceded. You have to remember how 'simple' it was to win the league in the early 2000s (you could lose five games by Christmas and still be in with a chance) and how they raised the standard, for Chelsea the following season to top it with an amazing cleansheet record and record number of points.The current Liverpool team is vastly superior to the so called 'Invincible's'. The Invincible's were a very solid decent team but the whole Invincible's thing only happened because Man Utd were in transition at the time, and Arsenal had no other major competition in the league. But the so called Invincibles were very beatable, had many weaknesses despite being a collection of outstanding footballers.
The current Liverpool team has that German mental toughness and resolve of the great Bayern Munich teams would have had. No weaknesses. Practically unbeatable when on song. Unbelievably consistent.
The Invincible's were perhaps comparable to Chelsea under Sarri or Villas-Boas, tons of superstars but very beatable when facing up against the very best opponents, and just so happened that the league didn't have opponents of real quality competing that year.
I use my own eyes, judgement and now experience with age. I don't think Anfield is a huge factor - it's Klopp that is the huge factor. I also know Wolves were not 'unlucky' at Anfield.
What season?They never once went behind a match past the 80th minute in the league so they did something right. No late staged comebacks, and very few equalisers conceded. You have to remember how 'simple' it was to win the league in the early 2000s (you could lose five games by Christmas and still be in with a chance) and how they raised the standard, for Chelsea the following season to top it with an amazing cleansheet record and record number of points.
Arsenal were suspect in Europe but domestically very consistent between 2001 and 2004. The one record this Liverpool team should be aiming for isn't to go unbeaten but to score in every match of a season which incidentally only Arsenal have managed to do in the PL era.
01/02. That side was probably better than the Invincibles.What season?
Unfortunately but fair play to them they are looking like they wont barely drop points let alone lose a game.
Would be beautiful, but I don't see city keeping up our pace over the next nine games.Liverpool basically need 30 points to win the title. If they win their next 9 games, the 10th win would seal the title. It would also match Arsenal's unbeaten run.
That 10th game just so happens to be Man City away.
Would be beautiful, but I don't see city keeping up our pace over the next nine games.
It's a difficult one to be honest. Apart from Liverpool, everyone is taking points off each other which indicates that it is quite a strong league. Take Liverpool out of the equation and the league looks fairly strong and back to how it was in the 90's/00's where the top teams lose 5-6 games a season and no team can be sure of a win.Liverpool have been incredibly consistent for getting on 18 months now. Crazy really.
Do you accept the arguments of the league being the poorest it’s ever been? Not to detract from your impending achievements as United/Chelsea and Arsenal have all won leagues where the league is poor. Just I’ve a couple of Liverpool supporting mates who insist it’s a very strong league and I just can’t see it.
Liverpool have been incredibly consistent for getting on 18 months now. Crazy really.
Do you accept the arguments of the league being the poorest it’s ever been? Not to detract from your impending achievements as United/Chelsea and Arsenal have all won leagues where the league is poor. Just I’ve a couple of Liverpool supporting mates who insist it’s a very strong league and I just can’t see it.
indicates a balanced league, not necessarily a strong oneApart from Liverpool, everyone is taking points off each other which indicates that it is quite a strong league.
League is probably worse this season than last.
I don't think the Prem will ever be as strong as it was in 07-08. You could argue the 4 best teams in the world were all from the Prem.
Still they've been impressive. Hopefully someone beats them.
Sure, Liverpool is also really good, but from what few matches I've seen from them, they always seem in risk of dropping points
Ehh, I'm not really after bashing Livepool, they just don't look like coasting to victory effortlessly. I'm also Dutch, we're all about aesthetics without actually winning anything.This is the new version of Liverpool bashing. It used to be about bottling it and not winning anything. Now they win marginally.
Plus, the measure of strong team has now been aligned to some sort of aesthetics-metric. If Liverpool's relentless efficiency isn't entertaining you then they can't be THAT good. Some of the most heralded sides in history were far more pragmatic and attritional that this Liverpool side.
League is probably worse this season than last.
I don't think the Prem will ever be as strong as it was in 07-08. You could argue the 4 best teams in the world were all from the Prem.
Still they've been impressive. Hopefully someone beats them.
League is probably worse this season than last.
I don't think the Prem will ever be as strong as it was in 07-08. You could argue the 4 best teams in the world were all from the Prem.
It's a difficult one to be honest. Apart from Liverpool, everyone is taking points off each other which indicates that it is quite a strong league. Take Liverpool out of the equation and the league looks fairly strong and back to how it was in the 90's/00's where the top teams lose 5-6 games a season and no team can be sure of a win.
It's really both. Big teams can't coast by on player quality anymore because the TV money has allowed midtable teams to buy very good players. The gap is now sufficiently small that a big team having a bad season will get dragged into the midtable dogfight immediately instead of coming 4th/5th/6th at worst.That's much more to do with United, Chelsea, Spurs, Arsenal being terrible than the league being strong (unfortunately for us). We've had a shocking season and we're fifth.
3 teams in CL semis last year, 2 in EL finalindicates a balanced league, not necessarily a strong one
I mean, did we though?Quality of the PL is declining year on year.
Quality of the top European sides has also been sliding for a while. The lack of competition domestically is starting to comeback on them. You've also had Real & Bayern rebuilding & an ageing Messi & Suarez at Barca.
It's incredibly frustrating that we peaked when the PL & Europe was still relatively strong. These lucky sods are peaking when everybody else is on a downward spiral.
It’s because you are on a United forum and Liverpool are walking the league of course it’s weak. The reality is a all English final CL and EL and all English teams are in the knockout stages in CL, EL.3 teams in CL semis last year, 2 in EL final
Imagine if they win the treble