Name Changed
weso26
What a try by Sexton
fecking James O'Connor. If he could defend we'd not be one try down at least.
Mogg is a solid player though.
We're saying the same things about our 10s and they've both scored..
Great kick Mogg yeah.
Halfpenny is such a machine.
Also, absolute Lions forward dominance.
gg. fecking so close from the Wallabies. Huge guts
Halfpenny is a fecking machine. Superb has deserved this. Defense immense.
Back to the drawing board for the wallabies. All their coached and forced awkward set piece running rugby that is predictable and shite can go and get fecked. feck heads that can't defend and run lines in set pieces and get smashed can feck off as well.
I really don't think it's that bad. Your forwards are definitely weak and enough to get munched by the rest of the Southern Hemisphere but you have a lot of creativity in the backs. Just get Quade back.
There is no point having speed and creativity if they can't defend. If we can't turn over the ball and build momentum and get the ball in good spots then there is no point. Our forwards aren't the worst but they are uncreative and one dimensional.
We're the stoke of Rugby.
Now you are being unfair to yourself. Stoke don't have flair and creativity. Think more Wigan Athletic.
We have players that can play but chose to play a one dimensional and pointless style..
BOD being dropped is an a disgrace and clearly cost the Lions the tes....Oh wait
Is that the players or the coach? Sky saying his job will be under threat.
A game of fine lines. Could have been done and dusted had Beale stepped up and kicked that 'kickable' shot at goal. But I agree anyway matched up in a one of test the Lions are just far stronger and far more able all the way across the park.Was an entertaining game and series, Lions easily deserved to win the series, just a far stronger team
Sadly didnt get to watch the game so just saw the result. Smashing win!Lions to win and Gatland to be vindicated. Just my gut feeling.
Sully, the result is what matters and so he was right. Any more dissent on the matter is just hot air.
How does the result prove he was right to drop O'Driscoll though? It seemed to me that we won because our scrum was good, their scrum was terrible and Halfpenny was brilliant yet again. The way the game played out meant that O'Driscoll being there was a non issue, that doesn't mean it was the right call though. Obviously the result is what matters in the end, that doesn't mean we can't still be critical of aspects of the way Gatland managed the tour. We won well today but I still think the team could have been even better over the three games. Just my opinion, of course.
I'm going to have to disagree with you there. The first series win in sixteen years, a record points score, and a breathtaking display of rugby prowess... I'm gonna have to say Gatland was 100% utterly vindicated. I do not see what BOD would have offered that would have made things any better. That's not to say I don't rate BOD as a player -- I honestly do -- but it was the right tactical call. Boy, was it.