Marty1968
Full Member
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2013
- Messages
- 1,903
The qualities that come together to make the above pass happen each deserve mention–Modric’s first touch keeps the ball under control so that he can use his body to hold off the man just behind him. He then dribbles into exactly the right area of space to give him room to make the pass so that the onrushing defender can’t break the pass up before it gets to the Madrid striker. Once Modric has the ball in the right position, he then has to weight the ball correctly and place it in an area where the striker can pick it up and run with it–and this is about a 35 yard pass that he is hitting on the run with a defender bearing down on him.
And Modric does this sort of thing routinely. But he also is able to pick up the ball in more advanced positions and run directly at the defense. The clip below shows this aspect of his game:
Alex Ferguson may have chased Laurent Blanc half way round Europe, but long before the Frenchman arrived at Old Trafford, there was another centre-back even more highly coveted by Manchester United.
That man was Miguel Ángel Nadal - the "Beast of Barcelona" as the British tabloids dubbed him - and on the eve of Real Mallorca's Champions League debut he's revealed to Guardian Unlimited just how close he came to signing for United.
"I was on the verge of signing [in 1996]," he admitted. "I had one foot and a half in Manchester. Everything with United was fine and I was ready to move, but there were problems with Barça and at the last minute they refused to let me leave."
"I would have liked to play in England," he added. "The grounds there have a special character which is different to Spain, and I've got very good memories of Wembley, even though we lost there in Euro 96.
"I had other offers later, but going at 20-odd is one thing, it's different when you're older and you've got a family."
Tonight, Nadal will have the opportunity to judge how he might have measured up.
As befits a man with five league championships, a European Cup and over 50 caps, Nadal won't be losing sleep over the Arsenal forward line. "I respect Henry," he grins, nonchalantly chewing gum, "but scared? Not at all."
Apart from that Nadal doesn't give much away. He is very relaxed and friendly, but there is a touch of the Alan Shearers about him - I never thought I'd hear "take each game as it comes" in Spanish but there it was.
Despite Mallorca's small club status, the man from Manacor on the east of the island insists that the Champions League wasn't out of the question when he signed from Barcelona in 1999. "I didn't join Mallorca just to go home. I knew that the Champions League was a difficult goal, but I thought it was reachable. Things are going very well."
"And there's a lot of excitement about the Champions League. I hope we don't let anyone down," he laughs.
Van der Sar probably regretted it, too. His years at Juventus were his worst. For the only time in his career, he lost confidence and committed what the Italians called papere—keeper's errors. The Italian media dubbed him Van der Gol, for "goal." Juventus asked him to have his eyes tested. In 2001 they packed him off to little Fulham in London. In Dublin on September 1, 2001, I was present at the nadir of Van der Sar's career. Holland lost 1-0 to Ireland and missed qualifying for the next year's World Cup. After the final whistle, Van der Sar strode off in what, by his standards, was a state of high emotion. He passed a small table that stood beside the field. It looked doomed. Van der Sar lifted a long leg to administer the coup de grace. But then, instead of shattering the table, he lifted his leg an inch higher and merely flicked a plastic cup off the tabletop. That was Van der Sar: the ice rabbit with perfect footwork. His best then seemed behind him. Fulham had assured him it was bound for glory, but the money dried up, and the former world's best goalkeeper ended up spending four years at a West London neighborhood club. Man-chester United and Arsenal seemed content soldiering on with substandard keepers. Whereas in the Netherlands a goalkeeper was expected to be an outfield player in England little seemed expected of him at all.
Oh and the part which got left out in the OP, probably because it was in spoiler -
Excerpt from book Soccer men on Van der sar in Juve -
VdS time at Juve while controversial and not being at his absolute best he was really solid enough. He conceded just 47 goals in 2 seasons. His first season in particular he conceded just 20 goals - a feat that was hardly replicated.
On the top of his game VdS is one of the best goalkeepers in the last 2 decades. We won't go for the peak VdS of course as in line with the draft, but having in mind his WC98 form and also his first season form he was excellent and enough to have a solid keeper at the back with excellent reflexes.
example of them in a good game against Roma.
FYI VdS conceded just 17 goals from open play in his first season 3 were from penos. Again I don't want to mislead anybody - we're not going for absolute career best of VdS here, we are going for his physical young best when he didn't have all the experience in the world but still was solid enough to post some great stats and clean sheets in Juve.
VdS received a lot of pressure from the press also being the first non italian keeper in Juve and also with the whole side misfiring and rather underwhelming in attack he was scrapegoated in some of those games leading to that not so fair assessment on him.
I guess so. I'm looking forward at seeing some feedback for him and how he's rated around hereMate I guess people would decide if Nadal is a bad defender or not
Anyway if we have to think about a bad defender, how about Marcelo ?
Marcelo has now entered his tenth season with Real Madrid and still has the odd defensive positioning or awareness issue. He is who he is - an above-average attacking wing-back who can create goals in times of need but can cost you points due to defensive lapses.
Marcelo is prodigious at what he does offensively but can be disturbingly bad when it comes to defending - both in extremes. The 27-year-old Brazilian has improved remarkably on the offensive side in this time - to the point where in the past couple of campaigns, his attacking prowess and ability to unlock defensive walls has outweighed his defensive deficiencies and earned him a starting role. But somehow, now as a veteran and captain of Real Madrid (second in line to Sergio Ramos), Marcelo has still not nailed down the defensive side and his weaknesses might be shown up come the business end of the season.
Here he would be against Caniggia + Zanetti combo, if there is a mismatch its this one.
Well again I am just quoting multiple neutral sources, considering him for worst XI of Juventus, worst buy of Juventus and basically having an absolutely terrible time of his career. These are individual neutral takes on him from a variety of sources, from blogs to news sites to books.
I am pretty sure Barcelona is not a good example at all. Don't think he held how own in those games. For the second highlighted pointed, I already mentioned its mostly because of his attacking input. As for the compilation, I have seen it and there is hardly any defending in that compilation.I guess so. I'm looking forward at seeing some feedback for him and how he's rated around here
Marcelo was up against one of probably the best Barca sides in history, I think he holds his own against the very best of oppositions. We have Modric/Conte and Helmer(for Cannigia in particular) to cover for him.
I think Marcelo is solid enough defensively otherwise you won't be a main man as a LB for Real for that amount of time.
People were calling out R.Carlos pretty much the same names during his time at Real and IMO they are very similar in both aspects. I think Marcelo offers a bit more variety in attack(which R.Carlos said himself) while R.Carlos is probably a bit more solid defensively, but really I don't see them much apart.
^^ nice compilation of him.
Marcelo is getting the same treatment as Carlos but for me both are great LB's best in their days(maybe Alaba has a shout now, but I see him more of a midfielder lately) that can man the entire flank.
He forced Juventus to buy a keeper for 32.6 million pounds. While getting sold to Fullham, when United and Arsenal both need keepers.Again, the media gave him hard time due to being the first foreign goalkeeper for Juve and the side under performing as a whole. The season before VdS with the same defence they conceded 39 goals. The next season with him 20, which is nearly double less. If he was such a bad keeper at that time how come that feat was never replicated by Buffon after him?
He never lost his place in those 2 seasons as well, posting the best stats for goals conceded in the league(Buffon as other excellent keepers were playing at the same time).
It was 1994 and Brian Laudrup smiles at the memory of it. A pivotal moment in his life, he says. On that journey to the Cameron House hotel, where Smith would make his pitch in full, he remembers two words above all others.
"I've been following you for years," the Rangers manager told him. "And in my team you'll have a free role."
"Free role" - the words Laudrup had longed to hear at Bayern Munich, AC Milan and Fiorentina, but never did. "I know how to use you," said Smith. Even before the car was parked in the grounds of the hotel, Laudrup was convinced that what Smith was telling him was true.
He forced Juventus to buy a keeper for 32.6 million pounds. While getting sold to Fullham, when United and Arsenal both need keepers.
In those 3 seasons Kicker rated him International class for 2 seasons and was 6th and 10th best attacker in the league. He also came 6th in Ballon D'or ratings.Speaking of league peak, Brian Laudrup has spent 3 season in Germany - how he is described here. He had cruciate ligament injury in Bayern which resulted of missing half of the season during his time in Bayern and subsequently sold.
Also Laudrup was best later in his career during his time at Rangers which has been noted in a lot of interviews. Here's a piece from Smith - who brought him at Rangers, when I think he was at his peak.
Nah I'm not buying that. Sure he was a little rash, in the same mould of Couto and Montero for instance, but he was still a top defender. Off the ball I'd take him over Koeman and Helmer every time.Also just to add in advance. I'm not sure how well rated is Nadal around here and sorry for sounding harsh in the write up, but I really think he's by far the worst CB on the pitch. Nadal was called the beast of Barcelona mainly for his surging through the field and generally relying on his strength and stamina rather than positional sence and defensive overall quality.
He was rash in some games, has a fair history of being sent off and also having lapses of concentration during his time at Barcelona. Koeman was by far the best defender Barca had in their dream team. After he left they shipped a lot of goals particularly the season I mentioned when they were 4th at the bottom in the goals conceded.
Nadal is generally not that much rated for his defensive game to be honest. He's an excellent addition in terms of versatility but IMO there were far better CB's that are in the draft.
and I also think we really dodged a bullet there trying to sign him in 1996. Barcelona were considering selling him and in the end changed their mind.
He was named Danish player of the year twice and one of his career peaks (Euro 1992 and 6th place in Ballon D'Or vote), came in 1992, between Bayern Munich spell and his move to FiorentinaSpeaking of league peak, Brian Laudrup has spent 3 season in Germany - how he is described here. He had cruciate ligament injury in Bayern which resulted of missing half of the season during his time in Bayern and subsequently sold.
Also Laudrup was best later in his career during his time at Rangers which has been noted in a lot of interviews. Here's a piece from Smith - who brought him at Rangers, when I think he was at his peak.
strange way of putting it as forced. Parma were in financial trouble which let most of their stars to be sold - Buffon included.
You don't buy 32.6 million pound keeper if you have a decent one.strange way of putting it as forced. Parma were in financial trouble which let most of their stars to be sold - Buffon included.
I am pretty sure Barcelona is not a good example at all. Don't think he held how own in those games. For the second highlighted pointed, I already mentioned its mostly because of his attacking input. As for the compilation, I have seen it and there is hardly any defending in that compilation.
Nah I'm not buying that. Sure he was a little rash, in the same mould of Couto and Montero for instance, but he was still a top defender. Off the ball I'd take him over Koeman and Helmer every time.
He was named Danish player of the year twice and one of his career peaks (Euro 1992 and 6th place in Ballon D'Or vote), came in 1992, between Bayern Munich spell and his move to Fiorentina
What ? I am talking about you refering to Marcelo as holding his own against Barcelona in this post, its not about Nadal at all - I highlighted and everythingErm, his peak came in Barcelona If Barcelona is not a good example what is to decide his quality? 56 goals conceded with Nadal as CB - only relegated(or close to relagation) teams conceded more.
Koeman is a different matter. Helmer for me is a lot more solid than Nadal at CB - in positional sense and defensive ability.
I guess so. I'm looking forward at seeing some feedback for him and how he's rated around here
Marcelo was up against one of probably the best Barca sides in history, I think he holds his own against the very best of oppositions. We have Modric/Conte and Helmer(for Cannigia in particular) to cover for him.
I think Marcelo is solid enough defensively otherwise you won't be a main man as a LB for Real for that amount of time.
People were calling out R.Carlos pretty much the same names during his time at Real and IMO they are very similar in both aspects. I think Marcelo offers a bit more variety in attack(which R.Carlos said himself) while R.Carlos is probably a bit more solid defensively, but really I don't see them much apart.
^^ nice compilation of him.
Marcelo is getting the same treatment as Carlos but for me both are great LB's best in their days(maybe Alaba has a shout now, but I see him more of a midfielder lately) that can man the entire flank.
Exactly what has been always said about R.Carlos by the general public - that he can't defend, only good going forward etc..Marcelo's character assassination Really good effort, and he certainly looks like a weak link here
Well sure, I don't deny it, the point is we have covered the threat as well as anyone could. While our threats are not countered as well. As for Kaka quality you just have to look at Zanetti and Carlos.Snowegma's midfield is just incredible really. I think I made a mistake by not picking Kaka instead of Ibra in the first pick. I really don't see anyone of the quality of peak Kaka in the other team.
Well sure, I don't deny it, the point is we have covered the threat as well as anyone could. While our threats are not countered as well. As for Kaka quality you just have to look at Zanetti and Carlos.
Whoops sorry, didn't think you referred for Marcelo thereWhat ? I am talking about you refering to Marcelo as holding his own against Barcelona in this post, its not about Nadal at all - I highlighted and everything
Well sure, I don't deny it, the point is we have covered the threat as well as anyone could. While our threats are not countered as well. As for Kaka quality you just have to look at Zanetti and Carlos.
First I completely disagree that Carlos and Marcelo are anywhere near same in quality. Secondly who is Carlos facing ? Salgado ? While Marcelo is up against a speed demon and one of the best Argentina forward in Caniggia.Whoops sorry, didn't think you referred for Marcelo there
I think if we get back and forward with Marcelo and Carlos we will have the same results really. Wouldn't be too hard to find numerous examples of Carlos being slated that he can't defend. They are a lot alike IMO, and given the draft pool, both excellent choices to provide width on the left.
Schneider is going at R.Carlos when we have the ball, so it's not only Salgado. That's why our set up is balanced on the wings. We have Modric dropping to help Marcelo if needed and Schneider providing more natural width with the defensive solid Salgado. Schneider will face R.Carlos at times like he did in that WC final.First I completely disagree that Carlos and Marcelo are anywhere near same in quality. Secondly who is Carlos facing ? Salgado ? While Marcelo is up against a speed demon and one of the best Argentina forward in Caniggia.
You quoted insinuations. VDS didn't regret his time there and he instigated his move away form Juventus, they didn't "ship him off".Well again I am just quoting multiple neutral sources, considering him for worst XI of Juventus, worst buy of Juventus and basically having an absolutely terrible time of his career. These are individual neutral takes on him from a variety of sources, from blogs to news sites to books.
The story on the other flank is not much rosy either. Brian Laudrup was a dribbling god, check out his performance against legendary defense of Milan -
1:05 for Maldini
Now here he has support of one Roberto Carlos against Salgado, who while is no Marcelo in defending, he is no Maldini either, and Laudrup even troubled Maldini.
I am sorry but you really have to see how many games Carlos, Laudrup, Zanetti and Caniggia have won for their teams. Its not about numbers I could potentially have employed 2 more strikers and claim that I have more goal scorers so I win. If Marcelo gets beaten over and over, one of those opportunities is going to lead to a goal, Salgado is also going to have trouble against Carlos and Laudrup.Kaka will win you the game tho, with full backs they are providing width and creativity but you still need someone to finish in in the attacking third.
harms also brought a valid point for Laudrup he was used a bit as a second striker in his time in Germany. And while you have man out wide the only pure goalscorer in your team up front is Voller amidst 2 CB's who are well equipped in the air.
Thanks mate. I'm really happy with having Kaka, as we'd picked him first choice regardless of when was our turn. For me he was just efficient and a man for the big stage, with added a bit of a sparkle that great Brazillians have. Carlos and Zanetti are undoubted quality so props for Tuppet for picking them, but Kaka is really one to build the team around and star at the biggest stage.Snowegma's midfield is just incredible really. I think I made a mistake by not picking Kaka instead of Ibra in the first pick. I really don't see anyone of the quality of peak Kaka in the other team.
I quoted individual sources, who have nothing to do with this draft games. You are hardly going to find an official proclamation of him being the worst keeper in Juve history.You quoted insinuations. VDS didn't regret his time there and he instigated his move away form Juventus, they didn't "ship him off".
I've already pointed out that his reputation at Juventus are mostly based on a few games. Remember De Gea at United? Judging by the media he was the worst keeper in the league. In all honesty he fluffed some crosses but was generally a very good keeper in that time for us. Eye tests are also common practice. That's again the media talking but by means, let them be your main source because no one is as credible as the media right?
I'd rather focus on Brian Laudrup out left than wasting my time on goalkeepers that keep clean sheets. I don't think I've ever seen him out there for any club in that kind of formation. You probably picked him because of Denmark's '92 campaign but whatever the reason is you're playing him in a very different setup to either that as well. He only spent two seasons with Bayern and he was injured for the most of the 2nd season. Shortly after he joined Bayern he quit the NT and came back right at the end of the '92 season.
I'm not interested at his performances that are closer to his career peak when you've picked him for the Bundesliga. You're influencing votes by doing this.