wr8_utd
Ripped :'(
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2008
- Messages
- 39,535
Might not like Madrid but happy to see Mbappe proving people wrong. He was being very unfairly slandered.
Might not like Madrid but happy to see Mbappe proving people wrong. He was being very unfairly slandered.
I agree with this. The two of them together will never really make sense.He has really picked it up, fair play, but its difficult to change my mind it was sort of an uneccessary signing.
Team balance looks a little better now, with Vinicius being suspended, but thats just a few games of the season, Vini+Mbappe long-term is still a headache.
In any case chemistry is much more obvious between Rodrygo and Mbappé than between Vinicius and Mbappé.
Why is there a MagSafe ring on the ref's red card?![]()
He has really picked it up, fair play, but its difficult to change my mind it was sort of an uneccessary signing.
Team balance looks a little better now, with Vinicius being suspended, but thats just a few games of the season, Vini+Mbappe long-term is still a headache.
Thats the 3rd offside goal, close to some kind of record?
Isn't the company that operates the VAR and automatic offside in Spain owned by Mediapro which until recently was owned by Barsa's main backer Roures? Not really suprising. No wonder some teams want Hawk-Eye to return.There seems to be some controversy with the chosen frames to determine if there is offside or not
Now is someone equal or worse than RouresIsn't the company that operates the VAR and automatic offside in Spain owned by Mediapro which until recently was owned by Barsa's main backer Roures? Not really suprising. No wonder some teams want Hawk-Eye to return.
There seems to be some controversy with the chosen frames to determine if there is offside or not
There seems to be some controversy with the chosen frames to determine if there is offside or not
Madrid Zone vs. Barca's financier. Let's get the popcorn out.I will totally take 'Madrid Zone' 's word on the matter
Seems having Vini out of they way has been good for him.Maybe Mbappe wasn't that bad of a player after all
His finishing is just extraordinary.Mbappe has been lethal in recent weeks, no doubt.
Technically it’s a second yellow for dangerous play.Crazy harsh. Red and penalty for getting the ball.
Hattrick Mbappe
Anyone see what Bellingham did there during the celebration?
CheersThink he hit the ball into the crowd.
Technically meaning what? It's a red either way and the player is suspended for the next match when I don't think it was a foul.Technically it’s a second yellow for dangerous play.
I’m just glad Jude isn’t injured.
Technically meaning what? It's a red either way and the player is suspended for the next match when I don't think it was a foul.
Bellingham is fine. He milks every contact and got the player sent off there like he wanted.
It is always a foul when you slide tackle with your studs up and get the opponent’s leg… it doesn’t matter how much of the ball you get in such situations.Technically meaning what? It's a red either way and the player is suspended for the next match when I don't think it was a foul.
Bellingham is fine. He milks every contact and got the player sent off there like he wanted.
Technically meaning what? It's a red either way and the player is suspended for the next match when I don't think it was a foul.
Bellingham is fine. He milks every contact and got the player sent off there like he wanted.
It was a yellow card and that's a joke. Touching the ball doesn't mean you can do whatever you want and be exempt of a clear red card.Crazy harsh. Red and penalty for getting the ball.
The Valladolid player leaving the studs just below Bellinghams knee while being the only foot that's on the ground is not a foul and Bellingham milking contact?Technically meaning what? It's a red either way and the player is suspended for the next match when I don't think it was a foul.
Bellingham is fine. He milks every contact and got the player sent off there like he wanted.
As in it wasn’t a straight red. And unless Jude has eyes in the back of his head: how in the hell can he have seen who was responsible for the challenge to immediately decide to milk it in order to get them sent off? Come on now.
Ceballos got yellow like 10 minutes before for the same type of challenge….
Not specifically against that player. He always goes down like he's injured in order to get a player carded or sent off. He's pretending to be hurt when he isn't which is deceiving the referee on purpose, i.e. cheating. A lot of players do it, Bellingham does it constantly and it's a blight on football.As in it wasn’t a straight red. And unless Jude has eyes in the back of his head: how in the hell can he have seen who was responsible for the challenge to immediately decide to milk it in order to get them sent off? Come on now.
Ceballos got yellow like 10 minutes before for the same type of challenge….
You think this wasn't dangerous? We have seen softer challenges than that break legs.Not specifically against that player. He always goes down like he's injured in order to get a player carded or sent off. He's pretending to be hurt when he isn't which is deceiving the referee on purpose, i.e. cheating. A lot of players do it, Bellingham does it constantly and it's a blight on football.
I will concede upon viewing it more that it was the correct decision in today's football because the player wasn't in control so the ref was correct. Personally I would not want it to be a foul and I think football is both way too soft and suffers greatly from cheating. Just because you touch a player shouldn't mean it's a football and just because the studs are showing doesn't mean it's dangerous but refs judge studs showing in slow motion with a zero tolerance policy.
Technically meaning what? It's a red either way and the player is suspended for the next match when I don't think it was a foul.
Bellingham is fine. He milks every contact and got the player sent off there like he wanted.
Stud's up without hitting the man is automatic yellow and has been for some years now. If you hit the man it should be red. Like Pouge said, there's no need for change.
I mean I don't agree with him but it should hardly be surprising that people can change opinions after 1,5 decades. If those posts were separated by 1,5 weeks it would be a different matter.Snow in 2025
Snow in 2010
I mean I don't agree with him but it should hardly be surprising that people can change opinions after 1,5 decades. If those posts were separated by 1,5 weeks it would be a different matter.
That is some petty historical investigating. Love itSnow in 2025
Snow in 2010