- Joined
- Sep 2, 2023
- Messages
- 173
- Supports
- F.C.Barcelona
What a great match from Lamine Yamal!!
A lot of quality in passing, dribbling and decision-making.
A lot of quality in passing, dribbling and decision-making.
He has some talent. Started off amazing and has slowed down a bit which will always happen at that age. He's a great dribbler but I'm most impressed with his passing. QualityWhat a great match from Lamine Yamal!!
A lot of quality in passing, dribbling and decision-making.
- The penalty should have been a foul on Rudiger or Joselu before the handballSo I didn't watch the game, I just watched the highlights and honestly...have I missed something? I get that it's incredibly unlucky for Almeria but, the penalty and the disallowed goal were both straightforward situations. Like, you genuinely can't complain about those in good faith. Vini's goal, ok, I can maybe see making a case that the images weren't clear enough to give the goal(ruling on the field was handball I believe?), though it does look the ball hits his shoulder
I dunno
It really isn't. Hitting people in the face is a foul, always, end of story. Complain with the rule if you want, but it's a foul. Same with the penaltyI think the disallowed goal is a bit questionable, I'd be upset if Real Madrid had a goal disallowed for that.
Yes, that one on second thought was bad. VAR should not have intervenedThe Vini goal was not helped by the fact it was initially not given, and only given after the VAR review.
Allright, disagree with this, but ok- The penalty should have been a foul on Rudiger or Joselu before the handball
This is unarguable. It's a foul. End of story. There is no other possible interpretation here - if you don't think it's a foul you are wrong.- The disallowed goal I'm alright with but an argument can be made that was soft and Bellingham went down easily
To me it looks right at the shoulder. Whether it was handball or not is besides the point though - it wasn't clear enough for VAR intervention. That's the mistake, even if you see shoulder(and good goal)- The Vinni Jr goal was a handball IMO as it hit him right about his elbow and it was deliberate
No, there's an HD replay from behind where it's clear it's a legit shoulder goal(can't post links). You'll only see shitty zoomed-in gifs from the worse angle possible to make it seem like it was a handball.
Even if we excuse Joselu (even though I think this is a foul) the Rudiger foul was clear. I mean, Rudiger jumped on the opposing player's back, holding him down with two arms, which prevented him from reaching the ball. How VAR could review the play and completely ignore this is quite baffling.Allright, disagree with this, but ok
It's a foul, but it can be argued it was soft and Bellingham went down easily. Like I said, I have no issue with this one.This is unarguable. It's a foul. End of story. There is no other possible interpretation here - if you don't think it's a foul you are wrong.
There is a reverse angle where you can see the entire ball and his arm and it looks pretty clear. But as you said, the biggest issue was that it was reviewed, and that's pretty damn scandalous. Even the commentators were confused.To me it looks right at the shoulder. Whether it was handball or not is besides the point though - it wasn't clear enough for VAR intervention. That's the mistake, even if you see shoulder(and good goal)
5 minutes of laughable defendingGirona v. Sevilla is some game.
Hattrick in 18 minutes.
Not really. He puts the ball in the net. To play for United you need to look eternally frustrated.Is Dovbyk United material?
Not really. He puts the ball in the net. To play for United you need to look eternally frustrated.
He looks awful in a lot of games. Watched them against Athletic Club, they defence, including him were hopeless.Ramos looking awful in this game.
He's too slow. Looks like a traffic coneRamos looking awful in this game.
If you hit it with your arm the ball loses all its momentum, the deflection is not going to go over the goalkeeper like that. For me, there's no more clear replay than the one from behind.Once you see it from the right angle(it wasn't really shown during VAR for some reason), it comes off his arm, it is clear.
To me it looks right at the shoulder. Whether it was handball or not is besides the point though - it wasn't clear enough for VAR intervention. That's the mistake, even if you see shoulder(and good goal)
Ramos looking awful in this game.
There is a reverse angle where you can see the entire ball and his arm and it looks pretty clear. But as you said, the biggest issue was that it was reviewed, and that's pretty damn scandalous. Even the commentators were confused.
3 of the goals came as a direct result of him skinning the left side of that defense. He's having a stormer.Savio looks some player!
If you pause this video in 6:37, and advance at 0.25 speed there is no way that you can see a handball there. Not just because of how high the ball is, but also because of the force with which it bounces off Vinicius.
Why look at that angle when the angle at 6:41 shows you the entire ball and his arm?
First time watching La Liga? Madrid and Barcelona get a hilarious amount of decisions go their way.Do so many decisions go in Real Madrid's favor so often?
2 ilegal goals for them but don't worry Marca Will have some news in the Negreira case this week.
Once again, why would you use the angle that shows the least? Makes no sense.Because even if you cannot see the anterior part of Vinicius body you can appreciate much better how high the ball hits on his body. It is clear for me it belongs to the green part of the picture below, never the red one
Once again, why would you use the angle that shows the least? Makes no sense.
Ramos looking awful in this game.