SoCross
Full Member
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2014
- Messages
- 3,705
Mmmbappe, ba duba dop
Ba du bop, ba duba dop
Ba du bop, ba duba dop
Ba du
Kylian yeah
Ba du bop, ba duba dop
Ba du bop, ba duba dop
Ba du
Kylian yeah
OrMmmbappé, duba
Du bappé, du
Yeah, yeah
Mmmbappé, duba
Du bappé, du
Oh yeah
Mmmbappé, duba
Du bap, du
Yeah, yeah
Mmmbappé, duba
Du bap, du
Oh yeah
Why? I'd always choose a player who has potential to be a devastating number 9 over a winger/wide forward. I'd pick a Suarez over a Hazard any day.Would prefer Dembele.
We won't get him for 40 mill though.Besides who's going to make the chances for this front 3?
Interest in Mbappe probably comes from the realization that Griezmann doesn't want to move to England. Not so sure Mbappe wants to either, mind.
You really know muppet season is approaching when posters start overanalyzing stuff. Rumors in papers about Mbappe = Griezmann doesn't like Manchester weather. 'Kin hellInterest probably comes from his incredible performances. It's natural, and probably every team holds an interest.
I would guess griezmann is our priority but perhaps he is not as keen on moving anymore and we have simply moved on to other targets which in this case is Mbappe.If this guy didn't score against City. Would anyone want him?
Its amazing what one game can do for a player. He was scoring for Monaco before that game and yet there was no talk about him. Now apparently "everyone" wants him.
Its a load of paper BS in my opinion. He looks like a good wee player but already talking about him being worth 80-100m because he scored against City is ridiculous. I'd rather just keep Martial and Rashford and buy Griezmann.
Already done on page 4Mmmbappe, ba duba dop
Ba du bop, ba duba dop
Ba du bop, ba duba dop
Ba du
Kylian yeah
19 goals by March is an outstanding figure for an 18 year old kid, I'd say yes.If this guy didn't score against City. Would anyone want him?
Its amazing what one game can do for a player. He was scoring for Monaco before that game and yet there was no talk about him. Now apparently "everyone" wants him.
Its a load of paper BS in my opinion. He looks like a good wee player but already talking about him being worth 80-100m because he scored against City is ridiculous. I'd rather just keep Martial and Rashford and buy Griezmann.
If this guy didn't score against City. Would anyone want him?
Its amazing what one game can do for a player. He was scoring for Monaco before that game and yet there was no talk about him. Now apparently "everyone" wants him.
Its a load of paper BS in my opinion. He looks like a good wee player but already talking about him being worth 80-100m because he scored against City is ridiculous. I'd rather just keep Martial and Rashford and buy Griezmann.
Already done on page 4
Why? I'd always choose a player who has potential to be a devastating number 9 over a winger/wide forward. I'd pick a Suarez over a Hazard any day.
Why? I'd always choose a player who has potential to be a devastating number 9 over a winger/wide forward. I'd pick a Suarez over a Hazard any day.
Wait which Dembele? When Martial first came i thought he would be a true number 9 but most people think he's better in a Hazard role but I'm not sure and even Martial himself says he wants to be a striker. And even with Rashford there are a lot of people saying he's better as a wide forward but i disagree with that.I agree with your logic I just think we need Dembele more as we have rashford and martial
But there is a very real chance that he will end up twice the player to
Wait which Dembele? When Martial first came i thought he would be a true number 9 but most people think he's better in a Hazard role but I'm not sure and even Martial himself says he wants to be a striker. And even with Rashford there are a lot of people saying he's better as a wide forward but i disagree with that.
Interesting. But I'd argue that someone with the very obvious brilliance of Dembele is more bankable to deliver down the line. With players with whom you can't exactly pin point the reason for brilliance, it's harder to have as much faith.Only rugby fans will understand but he is like Beauden Barrett, he isn't flashy but he does almost everything how he is supposed to, when he is supposed to.
No we haven't. We've fallen behind in team building. The problem we have is persistent in your post. We have a tendency to have an obsession with being BIG and that can get in the way of actually being good.There are many factors to consider with this type of deal. Ultimately, we want the best players in the world. We have fallen behind a bit in the arms race in recent years, and frankly, the Premier League has always been a bit behind in the race to acquire bonafide Balon D'or candidates.
I agree with the notion that we won't necessarily bridge the gap with the likes of Barcelona by buying a Lukaku. Given the difficulty in buying the actual Suarez/Neymar etc from these clubs, we have to speculate, either with our own, or with those who look like they could become.
£80m is a load of money. Lukaku would probably cost the same, and things could go left for Mbappé and he may end up a worse player than Lukaku even. But there is a very real chance that he will end up twice the player too, just like the forwards all our rivals have, who we cannot buy from them. Leaving an Mbappé to them runs the risk of allowing them the right succession plan to replace their existing unattainable and better-than-ours strikers.
The money is ridiculous, but price of a good is very subjective. Saying he isn't worth it is futile. The reality is that he is. His value is the price it takes to convince Monaco to change their stance from 'we won't sell' to 'okay, let's talk'. If we don't want to go there, they will happily keep him. If the price was prohibitive enough that not only us, it no other team would consider paying it - then a player simply becomes 'priceless' or 'not for sale'. €100m for Mbappé doesn't put him there though, it just puts him as 'expensive'. So desirable is the good though, that someone will likely pay if we don't.
Personally, I think he's a great talent, it wouldn't mind either way whatever we do on this one. That said, I am in support of this as a concept, in the sense that if the manager genuinely believes he is looking at the next R9, then we have to pursue it, and €100m is not too much in my view, providing we can afford it. I also don't think logic needs to come into it, in the sense that 'but we need a RB more' etc. If we are talking of an 18 year old R9, then to hell with the right back for now. That is a player who could shape European football for years. Ultimately, if Mourinho is as 'bewitched' as they say he is, then we have to do it.
No we haven't. We've fallen behind in team building. The problem we have is persistent in your post. We have a tendency to have an obsession with being BIG and that can get in the way of actually being good.
Interesting. But I'd argue that someone with the very obvious brilliance of Dembele is more bankable to deliver down the line. With players with whom you can't exactly pin point the reason for brilliance, it's harder to have as much faith.
Having said that for all I know maybe Mbappe becomes one of the best goalscorer in the game and dembele ends up never having that in this repertoire.
He was wanted last summer for big money but it's true that when England discover a player, they go over the top.
Why is Dembele being brought into this? He's not even an option at the moment.
If he becomes available in the coming years, he could still be signed if he wanted to come.
Dembele and Mbappe are good French youngsters who have great potential to be superstars. Mbappe has taken Europe by storm this season with impressive and consistent performances. In my opinion, Dembele has a higher ceiling and we don't even have a glimpse of his untapped potential. And since he hasn't broken out, it maybe a blessing to buy him now when he won't be that expensive.
There's no way I'd spend 100 mil. on Mbappe, good though he is. I wouldn't spend so much on 18 years old.
Just look at Dortmund. They spent bugger all on Ousmane & Pulisic. Those guys will terrorize the CL for years to come. They're going to be unstoppable.
There's no way I'd spend 100 mil. on Mbappe, good though he is. I wouldn't spend so much on 18 years old.
Just look at Dortmund. They spent bugger all on Ousmane & Pulisic. Those guys will terrorize the CL for years to come. They're going to be unstoppable.
Lol.Yeah for Bayern.
Just one phone call to Martial on how he's year has been is more enough to deter him from considering us. Add another phone call from Zidane and it a deal
Dembele and Mbappe are good French youngsters who have great potential to be superstars. Mbappe has taken Europe by storm this season with impressive and consistent performances. In my opinion, Dembele has a higher ceiling and we don't even have a glimpse of his untapped potential. And since he hasn't broken out, it maybe a blessing to buy him now when he won't be that expensive.