He is nowhere near a 180k per week player yet, he might even be a 300k per week superstar, but not yet. So he should get paid for his current value, not hypothetical future. You can raise his wages every year if you want to in the future.
considering what Amad earns, 100K plus bonuses would be a compromise, no?
Teamtalk, the Sun, the mirror and some no mark writing for the Guardian. What auspicious sources!
Also the headlines scream ‘Kobbies going to reject a contract offer and move abroad!’ And when you read the article it says’if he chooses to leave’ - it’s a bunch of utter bollocks.
I agree it's going to be very likely paper talk, I just think the sentiment that he can be sold if he's demanding 180k a week is a fair one.No of course he isn’t worth that much, I haven’t said he should be paid that sum but like Geebs said he isn’t going to jump from £20k to nearly 10x that, and I don’t for a minute believe he is asking that much. This is all just agent posturing to get the best contract he can for Kobbie , which is fair enough.
I am really sick of all the hyperbole around our squad, “ he a mercenary Cnut! Feck him off! He shit anyway! Always injured, stealing a living! “ it’s nauseatingly ridiculous.
Clairvoyant, I tell ya!You knew they posted that before you entered the thread?
I narrowly resisted being this annoying.
140k!?It's not competitive because other clubs will pay him more. Not necessarily 180k, but more than 100k. If his agent demands 180k, we offer 100k, an agreement is found at 140k which keeps our most promising midfield talent around until 2030, that would be fine wouldn't it, with no need fo vitriol and hysterics.
The fear I have rather is that Ratcliffe and his goons are on a mission to asset strip our club and will be trying to sell Mainoo.
Personally I think that Ugarte and DeLigt are good value at their pricesWe have to sell everyone with value if they want any chance of rebuilding something new after all the failed investments made in the squad.
No club comes close to United when it comes to transfer flops.
- Antony £95M
- Maguire £87M
- Sancho £85M
- Højlund £73M
- Casemiro £70M
- Fernandez £65M
- Mount £64M
- Martinez £57M
- Ugarte £50M
- Onana £50M
- De Ligt £45M
- Zirkzee £42M
This group alone has cost £783M – just for this bunch of useless players (except Fernandez).
It’s unbelievable how poor United’s transfer business has been!
Fernandez is probably the only one who comes close to being worth the money. It’s just insane that people this bad at their job can completely ruin a club.
No wonder we have no money...
And what in the world is Bruno doing on that list...?!Personally I think that Ugarte and DeLigt are good value at their prices
Oops I missed that. He’s obviously repaid that fee many times over.And what in the world is Bruno doing on that list...?!
Agreed. And I feel Zirkzee is going to play himself into being a good player for us too.Personally I think that Ugarte and DeLigt are good value at their prices
Mainoo’s strengths and weaknesses are very apparent from both the stats and the eye test.You guys have been poor sellers too often in the past (Lingard, Rashford, etc), so if there is an impasse, this could be a good time to cash in. I'm not convinced that his value will go up at all. Could be second-season syndrome and the lack of a pre-season (for two years now), but even some of the 70m quotes appear fanciful on what he has shown this term.
His lack of physicality is very noticeable and the opposition are just going to mercilessly target this. In a three-man midfield it can be mitigated, but in Amorim's system it means you're effectively playing with one in midfield, especially if one of the centre-halves doesn't move up or a full-back doesn't invert.
I'm starting to wonder if he couldn't be converted into a '6'. He has skills to be a '10' but not an elite one, to my mind (an elite player in one of Amorim's 10s would be a huge help, along with a striker and an all-action midfielder who can pass). An '8' is an issue in Amorim's system, but could be worth at least giving him a spin in a defensive-midfield role before the season is out?
Even in a team that suits him, his lack of athleticism and very average passing ability limits him. He wouldn't really add much to that team compared to other players.Mainoo’s strengths and weaknesses are very apparent from both the stats and the eye test.
Stick him in a possession based system where his main remit is to circulate the ball across the middle three, carry into open spaces and evade the press and you’ve got yourself a 19 y/o who does those things to an elite level. I look at Enrique’s set up at Paris St Germain for instance and see him meshing perfectly there.
In this current manager’s very particular and very specialised formation — Mainoo is positionless. Outside of his major weakness of getting up and down the field like you mention from the two man no.8 position, his passing is not the most insightful or progressive so he lacks the expansiveness needed there. He’s also not good enough off the ball or explosive in half spaces to be the “inside no.10”.
I think our other top youth talent in Garnacho suffers a similar fate with this system.
Personally, if the choice was to back this manager or retain Mainoo, I’d be leaning toward the latter — especially given the fact he’s an English homegrown player who has put some MOTM performances in against our biggest domestic rivals and done well at the World Cup at such a young age.
… That being said — the club are struggling with PSR/financial stuff so if the right offer comes in I would begrudgingly accept letting him go to fix the greater parts of the squad.
Definitely agree with that to an extent — but I also think Mainoo is young enough and talented enough to have the right manager mould him a bit better in that regard. So far he has spent his formative years in professional football under a manager who basically played an empty chasm in midfield and (limited game time) under one who prefers wingback progression.Even in a team that suits him, his lack of athleticism and very average passing ability limits him. He wouldn't really add much to that team compared to other players.
True, but then it's very reasonable for us to sell him then.Definitely agree with that to an extent — but I also think Mainoo is young enough and talented enough to have the right manager mould him a bit better in that regard. So far he has spent his formative years in professional football under a manager who basically played an empty chasm in midfield and (limited game time) under one who prefers wingback progression.
No need to be like English media, makin Transfer fee bigger than it was and adding the add-ons. Not sure, except Bruno, rest of them did trigger their add-ons.We have to sell everyone with value if they want any chance of rebuilding something new after all the failed investments made in the squad.
No club comes close to United when it comes to transfer flops.
- Antony £95M (£85m; £80.75m + £4.25m)
- Maguire £87M (£80m)
- Sancho £85M (£73m)
- Højlund £73M (£72m; £64m + £8m in add-ons)
- Casemiro £70M (£70m; £60m + £10m in add-ons)
- Fernandez £65M (£47m + add-ons= United have forked out £8.6m (€10m) in total in instalments. The first €5m payment was made after BF reached 25 apps, while the next was made after they qualified for the CL. The first year they reached the top four saw them pay €3m, then the second time another €1m while third year have finished in the top four again, meaning a further €1m has been paid. Ole/Ralf season United failed to reach the CL, which saw them not pay up but that has since been rectified in EtH's first campaign in charge. But United might not have finished paying for the playmaker, with another €15m (£13m) possibly still to be paid. However, it will rely on the Red Devils winning the CL and BF winning the Ballon d'Or. Transfer fee + payed add-ons = £47m+£8,6m= £55,6m
- Mount £64M (£60m; £55m + £5m in add-ons)
- Martinez £57M (£57m; £48.5m + £8.5m in add-ons)
- Ugarte £50M (£42m +£8m in add-ons)
- Onana £50M €50m= (£42.3m + €10m in add-ons)
- De Ligt £45M = (£43m; £38m + £4.5m in Add-ons)
- Zirkzee £42M (£36m)
Looks like OP was quoting the EUR fees with a £ signNo need to be like English media, makin Transfer fee bigger than it was and adding the add-ons. Not sure, except Bruno, rest of them did trigger their add-ons.
That's what's happening though, it's all a negotiating P/R game.
Ask for a crazy number so that when he accepts a more reasonable figure, the club looks good (for not accepting the first request) and the player looks loyal for lowering his "demands" in order to stay.
Glazer leadership have nothing to do with this. He was rightfully promoted because he was showing a great deal of talent.Kobbie is a victim of the Glazer leadership. He breaks through at 18 so we decide he’s immediately now a first teamer, with no real plan to nurture him in. Just thrown in at the deep end and burned out already - now this first teamer expects first team wages, who can blame him for that.
Every single problem we have is a consequence of financial constraints and poor squad planning.
And the latest outcome of this mess is we lose a potentially world class local lad who we all turn on now for being greedy while ginger Joel gets some more cream
It's just my feeling, could be wrong. It's common for agents to push for this tooAny evidence of this, you might be right as I hadn't thought it would have come from his side?
Every team on the planet play their teenagers if they're good enough, you're talking rubbish.Kobbie is a victim of the Glazer leadership. He breaks through at 18 so we decide he’s immediately now a first teamer, with no real plan to nurture him in. Just thrown in at the deep end and burned out already - now this first teamer expects first team wages, who can blame him for that.
Every single problem we have is a consequence of financial constraints and poor squad planning.
And the latest outcome of this mess is we lose a potentially world class local lad who we all turn on now for being greedy while ginger Joel gets some more cream
Exactly this. Both sides leaking to the press to try and get their side an advantage. Mainoos camp saying he might leave, the club is toxic etc while the United side saying he's done less than Amad/Garnacho and we have a new wage structure/decision makersThat's what's happening though, it's all a negotiating P/R game.
Ask for a crazy number so that when he accepts a more reasonable figure, the club looks good (for not accepting the first request) and the player looks loyal for lowering his "demands" in order to stay.
And this is a very good reason why we need to be careful with a player like Chido Obi.Kobbie is a victim of the Glazer leadership. He breaks through at 18 so we decide he’s immediately now a first teamer, with no real plan to nurture him in. Just thrown in at the deep end and burned out already - now this first teamer expects first team wages, who can blame him for that.
Every single problem we have is a consequence of financial constraints and poor squad planning.
And the latest outcome of this mess is we lose a potentially world class local lad who we all turn on now for being greedy while ginger Joel gets some more cream
Every game until burn out while knowing they’re also in internationals?Every team on the planet play their teenagers if they're good enough, you're talking rubbish.
Except he hasn't played every game has he..Every game until burn out while knowing they’re also in internationals?
Nope.
He should not earn what Amad earns. Should not even earn what Garna earns.considering what Amad earns, 100K plus bonuses would be a compromise, no?
Why between? He should clearly be on less than Amad and at most the same as Garnacho imo. He’s been extremely unimpressive this season.What is he worth and what is a fair price within the newer salary structure? (Ignoring the mistakes of the past 5 years)
Somewhere between Garnacho and Amad obviously. His agent talk of 180k is far too high even for a negotiating tactic.
Why between? He should clearly be on less than Amad and at most the same as Garnacho imo. He’s been extremely unimpressive this season.
If you were making the comparison in August - no one argue Amad should be paid more than Mainoo.Why between? He should clearly be on less than Amad and at most the same as Garnacho imo. He’s been extremely unimpressive this season.
Mainoo’s strengths and weaknesses are very apparent from both the stats and the eye test.
Stick him in a possession based system where his main remit is to circulate the ball across the middle three, carry into open spaces and evade the press and you’ve got yourself a 19 y/o who does those things to an elite level. I look at Enrique’s set up at Paris St Germain for instance and see him meshing perfectly there.
In this current manager’s very particular and very specialised formation — Mainoo is positionless. Outside of his major weakness of getting up and down the field like you mention from the two man no.8 position, his passing is not the most insightful or progressive so he lacks the expansiveness needed there. He’s also not good enough off the ball or explosive in half spaces to be the “inside no.10”.
I think our other top youth talent in Garnacho suffers a similar fate with this system.
Personally, if the choice was to back this manager or retain Mainoo, I’d be leaning toward the latter — especially given the fact he’s an English homegrown player who has put some MOTM performances in against our biggest domestic rivals and done well at the World Cup at such a young age.
… That being said — the club are struggling with PSR/financial stuff so if the right offer comes in I would begrudgingly accept letting him go to fix the greater parts of the squad.
Huh?Except he hasn't played every game has he..
He's been left out in plenty of games