USREDEVIL
Full Member
If we get Tuchel and McKenna goes to Chelsea that might make sense. If it goes tits up with Tuchel, i'm sure we can nick McKenna off Chels next summer. And he'd have EPL experience with a marginally large club by then.
Who is?
If we get Tuchel and McKenna goes to Chelsea that might make sense. If it goes tits up with Tuchel, i'm sure we can nick McKenna off Chels next summer. And he'd have EPL experience with a marginally large club by then.
If we get Tuchel and McKenna goes to Chelsea that might make sense. If it goes tits up with Tuchel, i'm sure we can nick McKenna off Chels next summer. And he'd have EPL experience with a marginally large club by then.
What do you even mean by this? What exactly are you expecting to see them change about the structure that they aren't already in the process of changing?Once again, fix the culture and squad or just set up the next manager to fail. For all their talk, ineos haven't taken a single step towards creating a better structure for a manager and we're expected to think their new hire is set up for anything but a fall?
I like mckenna
But not long ago you had dressing room leaks criticising the same guy and hinting that the players didn't like him. Possible some of the same players as now. He was assistant to a man half of this forum called a pe teacher.
He was literally coaching us under solskjaer. Who some people say had no style whatsoever.
Once again, fix the culture and squad or just set up the next manager to fail. For all their talk, ineos haven't taken a single step towards creating a better structure for a manager and we're expected to think their new hire is set up for anything but a fall?
They've actually made some huge moves. Some things take time and additional effort, not INEOS's fault.Berrada, Ashworth and Wilcox but not a single step? Ok.
The good thing for McKenna to come here now is that ETH has cleaned out Ronaldo. The current group of the players we have are good fellas in general.
I like mckenna
But not long ago you had dressing room leaks criticising the same guy and hinting that the players didn't like him. Possible some of the same players as now. He was assistant to a man half of this forum called a pe teacher.
He was literally coaching us under solskjaer. Who some people say had no style whatsoever.
Once again, fix the culture and squad or just set up the next manager to fail. For all their talk, ineos haven't taken a single step towards creating a better structure for a manager and we're expected to think their new hire is set up for anything but a fall?
I remember similar things being said but the hierarchy has completely changed. That being said there are still a lot of the playing staff that need gotten rid of regardless of who the manager is.I like mckenna
But not long ago you had dressing room leaks criticising the same guy and hinting that the players didn't like him. Possible some of the same players as now. He was assistant to a man half of this forum called a pe teacher.
He was literally coaching us under solskjaer. Who some people say had no style whatsoever.
Once again, fix the culture and squad or just set up the next manager to fail. For all their talk, ineos haven't taken a single step towards creating a better structure for a manager and we're expected to think their new hire is set up for anything but a fall?
Ye he wouldn’t be the most exciting appointment. Who would his coaching staff even be? I mean we can’t be bringing a league 1 back room team here. I also read t before that said the players didn’t like his training methods and thought they was academy standard.I like mckenna
But not long ago you had dressing room leaks criticising the same guy and hinting that the players didn't like him. Possible some of the same players as now. He was assistant to a man half of this forum called a pe teacher.
He was literally coaching us under solskjaer. Who some people say had no style whatsoever.
Once again, fix the culture and squad or just set up the next manager to fail. For all their talk, ineos haven't taken a single step towards creating a better structure for a manager and we're expected to think their new hire is set up for anything but a fall?
I don't think it is fair to judge his philosophy especially when you have most league 2 players. Even with the limited squad his team has an impressive 53%, and scored so many goals with in the process. I agree with you Mckenna may choose to play a quick transitional football. But, he hasn't the luxury to apply his own philosophy at Ipswich.If Mckenna is the guy we go with, it would be quite clear we would like to actually play the quick transition Liverpool-esque football that Ten Haag failed to establish this season. His team in the championship had the most shots. They also had an average of 53% possession, which suggests that its clearly not a possession based system he uses.
From what I've seen, he plays a narrow 4231, with a very narrow and tight front line, to ensure that nothing goes through the middle. Which also helps with combination play in transition.
Build up seems to be similar to a lot of teams, but rather than having a midfielder drop deep, having a more defensively focused full back as part of the back 3, whilst the other one pushes up. I can see Shaw taking on that role.
He also seems to uses a lot of switches and quick combinations. For me, a more sophisticated style than Ole used, with a balanced shape employed to modernise it.
Ironically, we already have good pieces for this in Rashford, Bruno, Mount, Hojlund, Amad, Shaw, Martinez and Dalot. We will probably need to ensure we have good energy coming from midfield, so 2 midfielders, a centre back, another winger and a back up striker should suffice. All of whom have high energy and the quality to move the ball quickly.
Brighton would be a logical next step in normal circumstances, but he'd be absolutely mad to chose Brighton over Chelsea.He’s fav to join either Brighton or us. He’s quite big odds to go to Chelsea. For us I think it’s between him and Poch.
He’d be mad to chose Chelsea over anyone. They go through managers very quickly. He wouldn’t be safe there.Brighton would be a logical next step in normal circumstances, but he'd be absolutely mad to chose Brighton over Chelsea.
Brighton would be a logical next step in normal circumstances, but he'd be absolutely mad to chose Brighton over Chelsea.
I like mckenna
But not long ago you had dressing room leaks criticising the same guy and hinting that the players didn't like him. Possible some of the same players as now. He was assistant to a man half of this forum called a pe teacher.
He was literally coaching us under solskjaer. Who some people say had no style whatsoever.
Once again, fix the culture and squad or just set up the next manager to fail. For all their talk, ineos haven't taken a single step towards creating a better structure for a manager and we're expected to think their new hire is set up for anything but a fall?
Because we're any better .He’d be mad to chose Chelsea over anyone. They go through managers very quickly. He wouldn’t be safe there.
True, but they are actually a super young squad that he could grow with. Guaranteed payout mind you!I get your point but with Chelsea's current owners maybe not that mad
He’s fav to join either Brighton or us. He’s quite big odds to go to Chelsea. For us I think it’s between him and Poch.
If anything we give too much time to managers.Because we're any better .
True, but they are actually a super young squad that he could grow with. Guaranteed payout mind you!
Sure, but no way would McKenna be "safe" at us. Ten Hag was deemed out of his depth, I dread to think how quickly that would be levelled at someone who's never managed higher than the championship.If anything we give too much time to managers.
Totally agree, ETH lost 19 games soon to be 20 if McKenna loses 4 out of his first 10 he’ll be under serious pressure too, it’s too soon we should go for Tuchel or Pochetino for the next 2-3 years and McKenna should prove himself with Brighton.If anything we give too much time to managers.
I like mckenna
But not long ago you had dressing room leaks criticising the same guy and hinting that the players didn't like him. Possible some of the same players as now. He was assistant to a man half of this forum called a pe teacher.
He was literally coaching us under solskjaer. Who some people say had no style whatsoever.
Once again, fix the culture and squad or just set up the next manager to fail. For all their talk, ineos haven't taken a single step towards creating a better structure for a manager and we're expected to think their new hire is set up for anything but a fall?
Yeah he's a life long fan.He’s a United fan too isn’t he?
Totally agree, ETH lost 19 games soon to be 20 if McKenna loses 4 out of his first 10 he’ll be under serious pressure too, it’s too soon we should go for Tuchel or Pochetino for the next 2-3 years and McKenna should prove himself with Brighton.
I like mckenna
But not long ago you had dressing room leaks criticising the same guy and hinting that the players didn't like him. Possible some of the same players as now. He was assistant to a man half of this forum called a pe teacher.
He was literally coaching us under solskjaer. Who some people say had no style whatsoever.
Once again, fix the culture and squad or just set up the next manager to fail. For all their talk, ineos haven't taken a single step towards creating a better structure for a manager and we're expected to think their new hire is set up for anything but a fall?
Yeah he's a life long fan.
If we get Tuchel and McKenna goes to Chelsea that might make sense. If it goes tits up with Tuchel, i'm sure we can nick McKenna off Chels next summer. And he'd have EPL experience with a marginally large club by then.
I like mckenna
But not long ago you had dressing room leaks criticising the same guy and hinting that the players didn't like him. Possible some of the same players as now. He was assistant to a man half of this forum called a pe teacher.
He was literally coaching us under solskjaer. Who some people say had no style whatsoever.
Once again, fix the culture and squad or just set up the next manager to fail. For all their talk, ineos haven't taken a single step towards creating a better structure for a manager and we're expected to think their new hire is set up for anything but a fall?
Sounds like he did a great job at Ipswich getting them to play greater than the sum of their parts. But, does he have the presence/ charisma to be a Utd manager?
Perhaps unfair, but I can't help but associate him with the failure that was the Ole regime. I wonder if some of our players from then would too.
They’ve clearly been forced to do it. Different from a panic. You can’t just put him in in 2 years if he is established elsewhere.This looks very much like a Panic appointment, if they have Tuchel and Poch available then put one in for two years and then appoint McKenna when he’s had a bit more experience.
Would it be fair to say that the Ole regime wasn’t terrible until Ronaldo came or is that still an unpopular opinion? Didn’t win trophies but got close multiple times, went further in the CL with less than ETH.
IMO it's not about results. If we had the same points tally we did this season but we were playing modern, sustainable football and we just needed the players to mature or we needed a few more pieces of the puzzle I would not mind. That should be the biggest factor, is the football going in the right direction?Totally agree, ETH lost 19 games soon to be 20 if McKenna loses 4 out of his first 10 he’ll be under serious pressure too, it’s too soon we should go for Tuchel or Pochetino for the next 2-3 years and McKenna should prove himself with Brighton.
Again, ETH doesn't do the negotiations.