africanspur
Full Member
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2010
- Messages
- 9,846
- Supports
- Tottenham Hotspur
What exactly is the point of starmer at this point?
To deplete the will to live of everyone under the age of 45.What exactly is the point of starmer at this point?
I've never understood why politicians are promising to abolish tuition fees, do people really expect a University education for free? A better bet would be to look at reducing them or improving the terms of loans.
Why not? That's exactly what the people who introduced and progressively increased University tuition experienced and what many European countries still offer.
I don't think it's that drastic. Regardless if he never had any intention of doing so, he shouldn't have pledged it imo.
What exactly is the point of starmer at this point?
You don't need to go to Germany, just North of the border.I agree he should never have made that pledge unless he actually looked at whether it would be possible. Aren't UK universities now struggling with the lack of overseas students who pay the higher fees and therefore a reduction from the current amount to free would have huge implications for some institutions. From a quick look, a number of the European countries charge but they are lower than the UK fee with a few charging nothing e.g Germany.
You don't need to go to Germany, just North of the border.
I know, regrettably. The point I was making isn't that you needn't go outwith the UK to find a country offering free at the point of use University education up to Batchelors (and, in some cases, Masters level).If you are from anywhere else in the UK aside from Scotland, you have to pay the full fees which is £9,250. So anyone from England studying in Scotland would pay the full fees.
I've never understood why politicians are promising to abolish tuition fees, do people really expect a University education for free? A better bet would be to look at reducing them or improving the terms of loans.
It used to be
Oh I know that but alot of stuff used to be cheaper. Things have changed. I would be very surprised if they are abolished, it would have a massive impact on the University sector. The best you could hope for is a reduction. I wish politicians would just stop making firm commitments until they've actually costed them out and looked into them.
Things change at the whim of politicians, they can change back just as easily if the will to implement it is there.
It's not as simple as that though is it, To reduce the fee from the current amount to £0 would have a massive impact on Universities. Who is going to make up the funding? That's why its a stupid promise to make, greater grants, change of the loan policy or a reduction in fees would have been better.
You’d increase places, especially for the courses with relatively low ‘face-to-face’ time for lectures etc which would improve the coffers.
Also look to increase foreign placements as they’re often the most expensive revenue streams for Universities.
But likewise you’d have lots of issues relative to that:
- increasing pay for lecturers etc due to increased workloads
- increasing support for foreign students with grants etc (or even letting them in the country to start with, given our current Home Office!)
Oh I know that but alot of stuff used to be cheaper. Things have changed. I would be very surprised if they are abolished, it would have a massive impact on the University sector. The best you could hope for is a reduction. I wish politicians would just stop making firm commitments until they've actually costed them out and looked into them.
Everything used to be cheaper. The cost per patient in the NHS has and will continue to increase at a far greater rate than the cost of tuition. It doesn't mean we should abandon the principle of universal healthcare though.
We look at things backwards in this country. We focus far too much on short term costs rather than long term gains.
Removing tuition fees would be a vote winner with young people but clearly its not possible financially at the moment for one reason or another.
It's not about looking backwards, it's about having a sound financial plan. There are severe economic problems at the moment, we can't even get stuff like universal healthcare right at the moment, waiting lists, treatment times etc. Removing tuition fees would be a vote winner with young people but clearly its not possible financially at the moment for one reason or another.
Why is it not possible financially? The Government can spend whatever they want. The main limiting factor would be the need to control inflation but abolishing tuition fees is not going to make that worse.
A sound financial plan focuses on long term gains. A government can easily address problems "at the moment" and offset the cost to do so with future growth. Unless they don't plan on growth, just syphoning off what they can until the next person takes over.
I don't think its as simple as that. I mean don't get me wrong, we have a shitshow of a government with the wrong priorities but we have high national debt from the past few years and that isn't going to magically go away.
We are in a different economic situation. You and others would be quizzing me hard if I just simply said: ‘Well, I’m going to ignore the current economic situation and press on with something notwithstanding the cost when we get to an election in 2024’.
But there are very important pledges I made, the vast majority of which stand.
But some of them – one of them was, for example, defend free movement as we leave the EU. Well, we’ve left the EU, so we’re in a different situation. So that’s clear.
Short term debt goes away when you pay it off with long term profit
We have amassed a massive amount of debt during covid and all the grants that have been given out. Our GDP is one of the slowest growing, we've shot ourselves with Brexit. You are simply not going to make it 'go away' just like that
You don't make it go away by shooting yourself in the foot either. There are two ways to clear that debt. Austerity or growth. You don't get growth without investment.
Erm how about the debt the country is in? Who is going to replace the income lost from the fees? How do you sell that as a financial plan to the electorate without sounding like you are trying to get money from the magic money tree?
Why? What would an electable Labour look like to you?I'm not voting for Labour whilst he's there.
We have amassed a massive amount of debt during covid and all the grants that have been given out. Our GDP is one of the slowest growing, we've shot ourselves with Brexit. You are simply not going to make it 'go away' just like that
Starmer claims 'vast majority' of his Labour leadership pledges still stand
In his Today interview Keir Starmer said he was no longer committed to the promise to abolish tuition fees that he made when standing for the Labour leadership because “we are in a different economic situation”.
But he claimed the “vast majority” of the promises he made in that contest, most famously set out in a list of 10 pledges, still applied. He told Today’s Justin Webb:
And what are your plans for investment? Shifting the debt is going to take a very long time, the Tories have screwed the economy, if Labour get in, the first task will be the cost of living crisis, NHS etc. You going to need a huge level of investment just to make the slightest difference.
If only education was a proven factor in GDP growth.
I feel for you it's tough to default to defending Starmer especially when the reasoning doesn't really make sense. That's coming from someone against absolishing the fees as well.