djembatheking
Full Member
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2013
- Messages
- 4,428
Great thread, typical Liverpool supporters trying to convince themselves that Klopps a winner in the league for scoring 90+ points but finishing 2nd . Keep it up, very entertaining.
Won't be surprised their classic alternative table will come up to make them worthy title winners of 2021/22 if not already.Great thread, typical Liverpool supporters trying to convince themselves that Klopps a winner in the league for scoring 90+ points but finishing 2nd . Keep it up, very entertaining.
Not their table, but…Won't be surprised their classic alternative table will come up to make them worthy title winners of 2021/22 if not already.
Liverpool spent 8 years in div 2 in the 1950s while we winning leagues with a team of kids. Anybody can point out bad spells for any club. I guess at least during our bad years our fanbase was loyal. Anfield was empty in the 50s.‘No marks’? You’ve had a njghtmare here mate.
It’s weird that we were never actually top after a full match week. I think City were top since the 15th week of the season. Even yesterday we were never actually top of the league at any point.
We shouldn’t act so spoiled tbh. It’s not a rough time we’re in, winning two cups and maybe winning a third (our 7th European Cup). I’ve lost count of the number of seasons I’ve watched Liverpool with nothing to play for by March/April. We should enjoy this ride whilst we’re on it.
Let’s be completely honest here.
If we look back in 15-20 years time, are people really going to be gleaming over Klopps reign at Liverpool having won 1 league title over 7-8 years he was manager? At the end of the day, it’s trophies that matter.
No one is going to talk about the greatest team ever to finish 2nd. Yes Liverpool have a great team in an era where there is a team even greater than them. That’s unfortunate. But it still means there’s a team better than them and they will be the ones to be remembered.
So this whole talk of this team being one of the greatest ever is pretty premature and unproven so far.
History remembers numbers, not narrative.he’s taken around 4 years to build the squad he wanted and has since been winning trophies. Let’s not forget that city spend way more than liverpool on their squad over the last couple of years (read the other day something around 3 times more). The players he’s signed were good but not great and he made them great. He’s made all the right signings rather than just signing high profile players just because cash was around (grealish to city for example).
this team will, unfortunately, win more trophies and it is all because of their manager being that good.
History remembers numbers, not narrative.
Let’s be completely honest here.
If we look back in 15-20 years time, are people really going to be gleaming over Klopps reign at Liverpool having won 1 league title over 7-8 years he was manager? At the end of the day, it’s trophies that matter.
No one is going to talk about the greatest team ever to finish 2nd. Yes Liverpool have a great team in an era where there is a team even greater than them. That’s unfortunate. But it still means there’s a team better than them and they will be the ones to be remembered.
So this whole talk of this team being one of the greatest ever is pretty premature and unproven so far.
History remembers numbers, not narrative.
That’s all beautiful but you’ve completely missed the point.he’s taken around 4 years to build the squad he wanted and has since been winning trophies. Let’s not forget that city spend way more than liverpool on their squad over the last couple of years (read the other day something around 3 times more). The players he’s signed were good but not great and he made them great. He’s made all the right signings rather than just signing high profile players just because cash was around (grealish to city for example).
this team will, unfortunately, win more trophies and it is all because of their manager being that good.
We lost the 08/09 CL final. Should we say we had a bad team? No we didn’t. But Barcelona were a different class back then
Except in Europe if Klopp wins again that is. No one since the unmatched Paisley touches him at that point.That’s all beautiful but you’ve completely missed the point.
I never said Liverpool was a bad team, I clearly stated they have a great team. However, the truth is trophies are what matter. Nothing changes the fact it’s still only 1 league title and a strong possibility it’ll never be more than that under Klopp considering City’s spending.
Fergie is always remembered for 13 league titles and 2 European cups. No one remembers all the European cups Fergie “should have won”.
People don’t look back and think Utd were the best team that year despite losing to Leverkusen in the semi final or Porto in the quarter final or the 2 finals we lost to Barca or the semi final we lost to Dortmund. You get remembered for trophies.
Yes Klopp could win more going forward but right now it’s bollocks to say it’s anything more than a great team who repeatedly came second to Man City.
Except in Europe if Klopp wins again that is. No one since the unmatched Paisley touches him at that point.
Coaches in England.Unmatched, except by Carlo Ancelotti (who could surpass him this weekend) and Zinedine Zidane.
Coaches in England.
I think they’ll talk him up a lot if he wins in Paris on Saturday. Two CL’s at one club is incredible for any manager.Let’s be completely honest here.
If we look back in 15-20 years time, are people really going to be gleaming over Klopps reign at Liverpool having won 1 league title over 7-8 years he was manager? At the end of the day, it’s trophies that matter.
No one is going to talk about the greatest team ever to finish 2nd. Yes Liverpool have a great team in an era where there is a team even greater than them. That’s unfortunate. But it still means there’s a team better than them and they will be the ones to be remembered.
So this whole talk of this team being one of the greatest ever is pretty premature and unproven so far.
Except in Europe if Klopp wins again that is. No one since the unmatched Paisley touches him at that point.
Couldn’t close…
Not their table, but…
They are really precious. Onward, Madrid.Not their table, but…
Not their table, but…
It’s also completely irrelevant to compare points totals unless maybe it 2 neighbouring seasons. Conte at Chelsea set a points total record in his first season for example, even Leicester won the league with more points than some previous PL winners.The difference is that SAF earned a enough points to win the league, time and time again. He beat what was in front of him, time and time again. Not only did he win the league, he consistently won cups alongside it.
If Fergie was battling with Pep and Klopp, nobody would be consistently in the 90s and SAF would have won at least 2 out of the last 5.
Pep won the league without a proper striker though, and mostly playing modern day attacking midfielders all over the field.Liverpool fans just have to concede that they lost to a better City side over the course of the season. It's not a slight on Klopp whatsoever I personally think he's a better manager to Pep money spent yes but less resources at his disposal, he's maximised the output from average players and his team's have a competitive winning mentality.
Pep does excel in many areas but his biggest flaw will always be subsequently the narrative he is unable to adapt with limited or refined resources. He left Barcelona supposedly with tension between himself and Laporta, left Bayern due to falling out with the board. There's an argument to be made that he doesn't have the character to sustain himself at a top club which historically and economically City are not.
It sucks but there's nothing much to be ashamed of losing out by a point to a team that's equally as great as you (or arguably better domestically). Klopp got to 99, 97 and 92 points in the PL, all three are more than United ever got under SAF. You can only do your own job and hope it's enough in the end.
And it's not like we bottled it this year or anything. The league was always a long shot out of our hands, so no, in that regard it didn't hurt at all.
I'm just going off what I read on Twitter mate, I don't care nearly enough to defend Klopp by searching for such stats.I see that Robin claims that Klopp has 3 times got more points than Ferguson's United ever got... except that's bollocks as it's only twice. United got 92 points in the 93/94 season and won the league and FA cup double
... Liverpool finished 8th....with 60 points and a GD of +4
We were better in the 70s and 80s than you ever were in any era. 4 European Cups in 8 years. It also took you 36 years to catch our league total. You were no marks back then. Relegated even. Not even the main rival to us. That would be Everton. So now you’ve been ahead of us in leagues for ten years. Kids jeez. No concept of history
I honestly think it’s an ego thing. In his world, Liverpool are the plucky underdogs that everyone gets behind. Loveable Klopp’s team. He’s living in a media bubble where his team is fawned over and doesn’t realise that in the real world, Liverpool is loathed as a club as are their fans.This is such a weird thing to bemoan. Supporters of a so called ''smaller'' club are always take joy in the misfortune of one of the biggest clubs in the world.
Was taken out of context, I believe. It was when he was still at Monaco and deciding where he'd go next as a teenager.Quite impressing and also scary the pull Klopp seems to have. That Mbappé even considered them is a huge warning sign. Hopefully ETH can have the same influence for us.