Red00012
Full Member
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2018
- Messages
- 13,504
Was going to post this as well.
How the feck has he missed the barmiest one ever? When half our team got injured and he said it affected them
I think the funny thing is people acting like it’s a new thing, he’s done that throughout his entire career. Also managers are human, we’ve had a horror season and just been unceremoniously dumped out of the title race ( or whatever slim chance we had) and it looks a battle to make top 4.
It's a really stupid question to be honest.
Klopp can be a bit more diplomatic but we really let the media off with the juvenile idiotic questions that offer no insight into anything
What was this?How the feck has he missed the barmiest one ever? When half our team got injured and he said it affected them
What was this?
What's a meaningful question? The layman doesn't want to know if the switch from 462511 to 5625471 did any good. They want to know whether Liverpool can still win it etc100%
Honestly, I have never seen a bigger disconnect between what a person's job theoretically should be - i.e. a reporter being able to ask a meaningful question - and how it is actually practiced in the case of football reporters.
Velveeta Teeth is something else.2018-19 season, we had so many injuries and we also made all 3 subs within the first half because of injuries. Rashford was also injured but he still continued to play. Game ended 0-0 and Klopp blamed our injuries for them not scoring the goal.
This isn’t recency bias for me.I think the funny thing is people acting like it’s a new thing, he’s done that throughout his entire career. Also managers are human, we’ve had a horror season and just been unceremoniously dumped out of the title race ( or whatever slim chance we had) and it looks a battle to make top 4.
What's a meaningful question? The layman doesn't want to know if the switch from 462511 to 5625471 did any good. They want to know whether Liverpool can still win it etc
I'm sure we would. But mainstream TV/music/news will always look at what interests the masses. And I think they'd want Pep /SAF/Klopp when he's trailing to be asked that question more than something more nuanced. I just don't think managers should display the arrogance, self importance and downright cuntishness that Klopp is on his interviews. These journalists may not be asking clever questions but you aren't a novice in the industry to not be able to understand why these standard questions are asked. Moreover, you never had an issue with generic and cliched questions when you were winning. It's just that these ones sting and that's why it annoys him. Tough luck I say.Fair enough, not sure how anyone measures what “the layman” wants really but I’d love a question that diverges from that framework myself.
What's a meaningful question? The layman doesn't want to know if the switch from 462511 to 5625471 did any good. They want to know whether Liverpool can still win it etc
It’s pretty simple: ask the manager does he still think they can win the league. It’s a loaded question but every question is for managers these days, he just has to say yes, no or duck it. He went attack mode.The layman is an idiot (relatively speaking). And the press shouldn't pander to idiots.
Seriously, in order for Liverpool to win it, they need to better their form from last year and hope something insane happens to City's form. Of course they can't win it. And that's not something that needs confirmation from the manager. Especially when you have only 2 questions to ask.
It’s pretty simple: ask the manager does he still think they can win the league. It’s a loaded question but every question is for managers these days, he just has to say yes, no or duck it. He went attack mode.