Can Foden be considered a midfielder at this point? For City he very clearly slotted into Sane's old role, and his best games with england were also in that role
England did a great job on Mbappé, Walker played his part but the few times he was left without help Mbappé skinned him
Re: Bellingham. The more i see him, the more convinced i am that his future is as a tactical, goalscoring attacking mid. Like Mount, only better(or Lampard and Gerrard if you want to go further back). He was good yesterday as well
Foden said pre-game in interview that he favours a #10 role and, most of last season, he played as a false #9 for City. Obviously Haaland coming in has meant a change of role. However, with the way Pep plays football, Foden ends up centrally a good deal. If England wants to use a #10, IMO, Foden should be the one in that role.
I disagree that Bellingham can be like Lampard or Gerrard. Lampard's goalscoring output was ridiculous for an attacking midfielder. Gerrard's equally so in that 2008/09 season where he played off Torres, in front of Mascherano and Xabi Alonso. I don't believe Bellingham will be that.
As I've said before, he's England's Wijnaldum or Gortezka. Versatile enough to be in a two man midfield, enough about him in a forward sense to be your most forward thing of a Fabinho, Henderson, Wijnaldum type midfield. However, for me, that's as far as it goes.
I have watched him for a while and he is overrated by miles.
He is big talent. Everybody can see that. But being talent and being great player is two different things. He should not be starting international games yet. He is still young, lacks defensive dicipline and is all over the place. He will be good but let it take time it needs to take. To loud him like he is already top class player is fascinating and wrong in so many ways.
I kind of agree. Although I think its incorrect to say he should not be starting international games. England does not have a midfield full of quality. He's one of the only players we have who will do progressive carries, which is important when we lack any kind of deep lying playmaker.
That being said his passing is good but not great. His touch is good but not great. His dribbling shows flashes, he likes to break out the odd trick, but he's not Paul Gascoigne. He's physically imposing but not so imposing that you would back him in every 50/50. As I've said before: I find him to be good at a lot of different things but excellent at nothing in particular. For a player like that to be touted as 'going to be the best midfielder in the world over the next few years' feels like getting carried away to me.
Bellingham's a top level player, no doubt about it and he's going to be at the top table of European football for the next decade. However, he's going to be one of many. People say he's still maturing and that's true but he's not going to reach 26 and suddenly start passing like Luka Modric. There are things about his game you can logically expect to develop but I don't think we wake up one day to find Bellingham is now the equal of Pavel Nedved.