Well, isn't this a hot take: Musiala better than Bellingham?
At what?
Goals? Bellingham has way more (Not to mention Musiala has 50% of his goals being penalties, Bellingham has 1 penalty goal)
Assists? Bellingham has more
Pass completion %? Bellingham 5% higher. Bellingham has 2x the passing distance yards completed, 15% higher long passes success rate and is statistically more successful at all 3 passing ranges (and quantity wise)
Aerial duels won? Bellingham 5x higher in percentage, 3x in volume.
Tackling stats are basically identical: Bellingham tackles more in his own half whereas Musiala wins the ball higher up the pitch. Bellingham has more interceptions, clearances, blocks, all three by a clear margin.
Bellingham has 60% more touches than Musiala, and leads in every department. More touches in his own box, in opposition box, in final third, in midfield third, in own third, etc etc.
Dribbling wise, Musiala has a 5.5% higher 1 on 1 dribbling success rate than Bellingham, at 50.5 and 56% respectively. Musiala attempts more 1 on 1 dribbles than Bellingham.
Ball carrying wise, Bellingham blows Musiala out the water, way more ball carries, way more distance carried, way more success in carrying ( far less miscontrols and possession losses both in absolute terms and % wise) and more progressive ball carries in distance.
Bellingham has covered 29% more ground than Musiala.
All the while Bellingham plays in a stronger league.
So, what exactly is Musiala better than Bellingham at? You could argue, slightly better at 1 on 1 dribbling and... his dribbling style with very sharp agility is more aesthetic I guess?
I'm really struggling to see how anyone can make the argument that Musiala is better at this point.