In accounting terms it works differently which is why many people get confused.
Our debt showed it went up and people straight away suspected it was the Glazers borrowing more from the club, but it was actually just us spending from the bank but keeping our cash.
It's actually better for a business to hold onto their cash but borrow more. Sounds weird but with the way taxitation works it's better.
You obviously understand this, but i wish it was more commonplace for the everyay man to also be aware of this.
Debt in corporate world is not a scary word. I've taken out large loans in my own companies to fund operation. Debt helps keeping the actual profits in the company, helps with tax savings and is an excellent low cost source of funds.
In terms of spending, I'll just put up a very stupid and easy to understand example:
#1
You have £100k
You buy a player for £100k in cash
Now you have £0 in the bank, but a £100k non-realized (financial) asset. You now have to borrow funds from the bank to cover cost of operation, salaries etc. Cashflow has a delay, you always need cash at hand.
#2
You have £100k
You loan £100k
You buy a player for £80k, with annual installments for £10k and £10k
You now have £120k in the bank, a £100k player and money to pay the quarterly fee using your operation income.
Leveraging your debt and cash reserves coupled with income and cash flow is how you build a successfull strong business. If you take on "safe" debt, honeslty, get as much of it as you can. The loan institutions will take leverage in your asset. This is in simpleton terms how Manchester Untied is bought, through security in the club itself.
Regarding Net spend, that's not an actual thing in accounting, but that's a whole other topic.