Bondi77
Full Member
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2019
- Messages
- 8,295
That means we are not then aka SoumareSky Sports reporting that we're in for him:
https://www.skysports.com/football/...ed-offer-30m-for-birmingham-citys-16-year-old
That means we are not then aka SoumareSky Sports reporting that we're in for him:
https://www.skysports.com/football/...ed-offer-30m-for-birmingham-citys-16-year-old
Actually they paid 8m for him, the price of a Bebe.On the other hand Dortmund got Sancho for nothing and now he’s worth 100 mil.
I can’t believe we haven’t signed him or his mum yet
What's your problem? I'm simply stating the article 10 days ago said 12.5 and It's now being quoted at 30m. I'm sure it could be the media just making figures up, as they do, but I also wouldn't for a second doubt ED would offer 30m just because we can do things that other clubs can only dream about.Oh stop being a rat lad
£30m for a 16 year old is madness. Liverpool and Chelsea signed Mane & Kante for that.
What's your problem? I'm simply stating the article 10 days ago said 12.5 and It's now being quoted at 30m. I'm sure it could be the media just making figures up, as they do, but I also wouldn't for a second doubt ED would offer 30m just because we can do things that other clubs can only dream about.
How is it?I would hope we loan him out until summer 2021. Easily the best thing for his development.
Agreed. I don't believe the Mirror for a second because my dad buys the Mirror and isn't aware of reputable sources itks etc. So he is always telling me about player x we are in for and I'm like dad it's the Mirror.It is interesting how so many articles and journalists are believed and taken as gospel when it comes to negative news but disregarded as unreliable when it is something positive.
What would you pay for a 16 year old Roy Keane or Steven Gerard if you had seen enough evidence that they would grow to be that good? I know its always a risk with young lads and exposing them to large sums of money but this kid has shown promising signs at a young age.£30m for a 16 year old is madness. Liverpool and Chelsea signed Mane & Kante for that.
I don't see us paying 30M for a 16 year old.
Kante had a release clause IIRC. Would have gone for double that amount otherwise, even in 2016£30m for a 16 year old is madness. Liverpool and Chelsea signed Mane & Kante for that.
It definitely is madness. But it depends on just how big a talent he is. If he turns out to be a top top player nobody will care about the fee. If he's mediocre/disappointing it becomes an issue.£30m for a 16 year old is madness. Liverpool and Chelsea signed Mane & Kante for that.
He would be playing his age 16&17 seasons in the Championship with his hometown club where he's already settled in. He would be with United starting his age 18 season.How is it?
Why are we always late on this deal though? There is always some excuse by our PR team. I am sure there is some CAM out there with a release clause which other teams can sign when they need them, but when it comes to us, we have to go and pay 50m for Fred or 60m for Bruno.Kante had a release clause IIRC. Would have gone for double that amount otherwise, even in 2016
I’m not sure why people think it’s a good idea for a 16 year old to be playing regular football! History tells us that kids that break through so young have careers ravaged by injuries and/ or are burnt out by age 28!
I’d rather buy him and develop him slowly- managing his game time rather than sending him back to Birmingham and having a tough couple of years getting kicked about in the championship
He would be playing his age 16&17 seasons in the Championship with his hometown club where he's already settled in. He would be with United starting his age 18 season.
I’m not sure why people think it’s a good idea for a 16 year old to be playing regular football! History tells us that kids that break through so young have careers ravaged by injuries and/ or are burnt out by age 28!
I’d rather buy him and develop him slowly- managing his game time rather than sending him back to Birmingham and having a tough couple of years getting kicked about in the championship
Quoting my other post as well as @Thiagoal 's because it's a serious bone of contention whether him staying in the Championship is the best way for him to develop, or even if Birmingham City have the means to best improve a prodigious youngster.There has to be a level of concern on how you handle a 16-year old's development if he's not coming from a reputed academy or playing with highly technical and savvy players who can act as guiding lights.
If we are buying this lad, his development is then purely in our interest and responsibility, at which point you look at Birmingham and ask if they're good enough to take him on a progression that benefits us.
I do have concerns for these extremely young prodigies in that they get played too hard and too often and everything seems fine and dandy with them... until they hit 27ish or so and are already fading due to having played too many games in the adult world (Cesc, as a CM, is the prime example).
I don't have an answer as to how you develop them properly because, I guess, when you're ready, you're ready, but these are still formative years of development and I can't help but wonder where the best place is for someone like him to improve on a technical level.
He's playing in the Championship, so there's no question he can handle the physicality and whatnot, but that's not ultimately what matters for us as we can gladly spare a year or two to round out a better product and worry about the physical aspects further down the road.
It's an unenviable task to handle the growth of someone who is 'ready' now on some levels, but is only 16 years of age.
Oh there are literally hundreds of them... Fabregas, Joe Cole, Dyer, Wilshere, just off the top of my head!History tells us with which players? Owen and Rooney? Who else?
In 2017 people were saying Foden and CHO had the same "talent" as Jadon Sancho and I sure as hell am not seeing it 3 years later.30 million for a kid who has same level of talent as Jadon Sancho/Rashford is not a huge amount of cash. Joao Felix went for £113 million as a 19 year old.
Foden doesn’t get quite the same opportunity as you’d expect given their midfield strength but CHO hasn’t come on as I’d thought.In 2017 people were saying Foden and CHO had the same "talent" as Jadon Sancho and I sure as hell am not seeing it 3 years later.
Sky Sports have confirmed it.No way are we paying 30million for him. Gotta be paper nonsense.
Why does any team sign any player on loan?
This way they get to keep the player and get the transfer fee. How would it benefit them to not have the player instead of having the player?
We're not talking about any player though, we're talking about a 16 year old who I presume isn't first choice
No way are we paying 30million for him. Gotta be paper nonsense.
Jesus Christ! This place gets worseCome on all over to my Place
hey Jude!
We're having a party
To be fair, it's a well-known song.Jesus Christ! This place gets worse
Have you watched him? What's he like?Looks like this one is real. Very excited if it goes through!
Could he come straight into our midfield like how Fabregas did for Arsenal? Is he that good?
Foden would walk into the Man Utd team and be the best player. It's mind-boggling that Pep is too pussy to play him. That's what happens when you have too many outstanding midfielders. It's like De Bruyne and Mo Salah under Jose, they'd have been kept dumped on the bench had Jose kept them, yet become superstars as soon as the get minutes elsewhereIn 2017 people were saying Foden and CHO had the same "talent" as Jadon Sancho and I sure as hell am not seeing it 3 years later.