Jaybomb
New Member
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2016
- Messages
- 4,459
We're simply shit without him.
I don't rate him as highly as some but I think he should be ahead of Mkhi as our RW who drifts in as a CAM. He's shown to have excellent link-up play with Valencia and Herrera down that side in the past.
His lack of pace isn't an issue for me. It's his reluctance to player killer passes and, when he does play said passes, he's not consistent with the weight of pass. He's a very safe passer of the ball in general for a 10. Plus, unlike the likes of Silva, Pastore and Isco who aren't the biggest of players themselves, he, like Mkhi, are very weak with the ball and cannot resist players who press.Best finisher, best final pass, moves the ball the quickest, concedes possession the least of all our forward players. Only thing he lacks is pace for those that have hard-ons for the Walcott's of the world.
Mata>Mhkitaryan.
Mata>Mhkitaryan.
Excellent runs today.
Mata>Mhkitaryan.
Mata>Mhkitaryan.
Mata>Mhkitaryan.
Mata>Mhkitaryan.
I don't see how that's even a debate. Even back when Mikhi first signed and there were multiple threads on how he has everything Mata has and pace I was frustratingly arguing against that
I like them both in the team. Two very creative players on the pitch.
As do I but I think Mata is better
He is class and needs to play every week. We're simply better with him in the side.