Sunny Jim
Full Member
When he was subbed off Sky showed a stat...he covered the biggest distance in our team. Suprsing, isnt it.
He looked noticibly faster aswell.When he was subbed off Sky showed a stat...he covered the biggest distance in our team. Suprsing, isnt it.
I think there was a chance for Ozil in their game vs Watford, I think. A simple opportunity that he failed to convert. Sure half as good is an exaggeration, but Mata's Finishing is way better than Ozil. With the amount of chances Ozil(/ any arsenal attacker gets,for that matter), he should be consistently scoring 10-15 goals a seasonNot half as good? I think that's a slight exaggeration imo. Mata is definitely a better finisher and goalscorer, but when Ozil does get into goalscoring positions himself, he genuinely finishes well and composed, it's not like he's someone who misses a lot of chances. Mata is better in this aspect still, no disputing that.
Only 2 years on his contract, got to be thinking about renewing soon no?
He'll probably go missing next game but we used to it by now. He's got outstanding goal/assist stats since he moved to United.
His work rate's improved a ton ever since he moved here. He's still easy to dribble pass, but I can see him being Mourinho's favorite for the number 10 role. Efficient and good stats, good set piece delivery, and hardworking.When he was subbed off Sky showed a stat...he covered the biggest distance in our team. Suprsing, isnt it.
This again.He's a luxury player. And one that not many teams can afford to have in their side - United included, in parts last season.
Unfortunately for Mata, he was purchased out of desperation on our part and so there was no thought given as to how he'd be utilised or indeed if he was even required.
I still have difficulty when you have to accommodate a player in a specific position and in a specific formation - in this case Mata being a No.10, in a 4-2-3-1.
He is undoubtedly a terrific player and a popular character - much needed in this squad. If he can maintain consistency or even prove himself capable of playing in a midfield three (akin to Silva at City), then he'll be a big asset for us.
This again.
@Mr PigeonWhat happened to he's blogs ? I used to enjoy the alternative blog a poster on here used to write, that should be brought back.
The last I heard Alternative Juan was spotted rappeling down Howard Webb's roof holding a Bowie knife and a bag of scorpions.
Its such a lame term.Wait, are you in agreement or expressing your dismay that he's being called a 'luxury' player again?
Its such a lame term.
I keep seeing him being called a luxury player with no one giving me any idea of what that means.Wait, are you in agreement or expressing your dismay that he's being called a 'luxury' player again?
What a complete and utter load of bollocks thats been spouted simply to justify one of the lamest and most ignorant terms there is in football. Utter nonsense term, meaningless drivel.I think it is an effective one though. If you'd rather focus on being productive and efficient then you shun what could be considered inessential. Juan Mata is one such player. His reduced mobility and lack of defensive contribution requires a teammate to increase their own capacity in order to make-up for said deficiencies.
If you are considered a lesser team, whose focus is on working as a unit, maintaining shape and cohesion, then a player like Mata isn't all that necessary. Conversely, if you're a team that takes the game to the opposition and you expect possession, then a player who contributes less overall, but is effective in the final third, can be afforded.
If you can't always count on a player, then you can't afford him his place in the team. He is, therefore, a luxury.
I keep seeing him being called a luxury player with no one giving me any idea of what that means.
What a complete and utter load of bollocks thats been spouted simply to justify one of the lamest and most ignorant terms there is in football. Utter nonsense term, meaningless drivel.
It's quite a lazy meaningless term.What a complete and utter load of bollocks thats been spouted simply to justify one of the lamest and most ignorant terms there is in football. Utter nonsense term, meaningless drivel.
I think it is an effective one though. If you'd rather focus on being productive and efficient then you shun what could be considered inessential. Juan Mata is one such player. His reduced mobility and lack of defensive contribution requires a teammate to increase their own capacity in order to make-up for said deficiencies.
If you are considered a lesser team, whose focus is on working as a unit, maintaining shape and cohesion, then a player like Mata isn't all that necessary. Conversely, if you're a team that takes the game to the opposition and you expect possession, then a player who contributes less overall, but is effective in the final third, can be afforded.
If you can't always count on a player, then you can't afford him his place in the team. He is, therefore, a luxury.
That's your (dismissive) opinion.
Is Juan Mata... less productive that others? Yes. Does he go missing in games? Yes. Can he be relied on defensively? Not particularly. (Hence his gesticulating at teammates to help cover his duties)
The term 'luxury' helps to define a player whose value to the team is a little more one-dimensional and not fundamental to the way a team approaches a game.
If you have an issue with the terminology that's different. But my point about Mata still stands.
That describes some of the greatest players who've ever played the game. Guys who you pay to watch. You wouldn't call them a luxury.
My last sentence was poorly worded.
Some might consider Ibrahimovic a luxury. To an extent he is, but he also has more to his game than goals. Namely, his strength and his ability to contribute in the air defensively.
A player like Ibrahimovic would be a 'luxury' to say Leicester, because he wouldn't be appropriate to the way they play.
That's what I am getting at by 'luxury' - how an individual relates to that of the team.
Has Ibrahimovich scored in every game?, his job is to score goals and if he isnt doing that in every game then he is missing in the games he doesnt score. Can he be relied on defensively? Using your arguments means its easy to come to the same conclusion with ibra.....
The whole argument and term is so flawed and mind numbingly weak that its pathetic.
My last sentence was poorly worded.
Some might consider Ibrahimovic a luxury. To an extent he is, but he also has more to his game than goals. Namely, his strength and his ability to contribute in the air defensively.
A player like Ibrahimovic would be a 'luxury' to say Leicester, because he wouldn't be appropriate to the way they play.
That's what I am getting at by 'luxury' - how an individual relates to that of the team.
Ferguson wouldn't of signed Mata, because he wouldn't have faired all that well in how he approached the game. Look how Kagawa struggled. Yes his chances were limited, but Ferguson has since admitted he couldn't get Kagawa to fit the system or approach. He was a tireless spark at Dortmund, at United expectations were different.
I see what you mean but Mata doesn't play for a Leicester. So I don't see how he can be called a luxury even of we go by your definition.
He'd be a luxury to Leicester in the same way he was a luxury to Mourinho at Chelsea. At Chelsea, he favoured industrious types and not individuals capable of being easily dispossessed, so when the opportunity arose to sell him for such a fee, he took it.
Prior to the beginning of the season, I didn't think Mata had a future at United, because I assumed Mourinho would play a different way. And I still sense Mata is dispensable to the first XI, but perhaps not in the short term whilst we're struggling creatively.
Again though he doesn't play for Leicester. He doesn't play for a dogged, no nonsense team, he plays for United. A club built on creative, technically gifted players. He fits nicely within the profile of a typical United player.
Apparently Jose is looking to give this "Luxury" player a contract extension.
I'm inclined to disagree. Compared to say Wenger's recruitment of short, agile, technical players, Ferguson's approach was far removed.