Devil may care
New Member
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2010
- Messages
- 35,976
It'll be interesting to see what LvG does with Mata if we get Pedro.
Maybe, move mata central and depay on the left and pedro right or keep mata where he is and move pedro to the left. If lvg feels young can be improved upon he is brutal enough to do soIt'll be interesting to see what LvG does with Mata if we get Pedro.
Maybe, move mata central and depay on the left and pedro right or keep mata where he is and move pedro to the left. If lvg feels young can be improved upon he is brutal enough to do so
It'll be interesting to see what LvG does with Mata if we get Pedro.
Silky touches and keeps it tidy but just doesn't add enough as a wide player IMO.
I think LvG is of the view that he is too weak to protect the ball centrally in attack, that's something Memphis has done well even though the position is not a familiar one to him.
Depay was dispossessed 6 times today. I wouldn't say he has done very well in that specific regard and I think Mata would do better with his technique. If Depay learns the role he will definitely provide a lot of penetration and dribbling which Mata will never do though.
It's simply because he is not very creative. I've said it countless times before on here - he isn't the player in the side that's going to play defence splitting passes, because it's simply not in his repertoire.What is strange today is that I thought he was fantastic today and yet he still remained totally ineffective on the whole... he doesn't make us a more threatening team when in possession he just makes us more likely to keep the ball.
Depay might be less efficient but he looks dangerous every time he gets it, Mata no matter what position he plays, he doesn't look dangerous. Maybe if we had a more dynamic striker he would be able to pass forward more and get more assists on the board.
He's a tidy second striker who takes a good set piece. Nothing more, nothing less.
He's lacking so much that's needed for a '10' in a possession team.
Worked really hard and had a few good moments that showcased his skill and control but produced very little in regards to actual end product. Not really a dig at him its just that he doesn't possess the skillset to be consistently dangerous in the role he was played today. He had all the defensive duties of an orthodox winger (and fulfilled them surprisingly well) with a little bit of leeway to drift inside once in the opponents half but he simply isn't suited to the right wing.
He invariably slows the play as he doesn't have the pace to burst past his man (or even force them not to get as tight) and isn't the crossing type which all makes the overlap so predictable and easy to counteract. Despite being an inferior player, Young provided (and regularly did last season) the more threatening supply in to the box. He'll have good games there over the course of the season but most of his good moments will come from drifting in to other areas (more central) rather than playing his position. Such a waste IMO and hard to make sense of.
He's a tidy second striker who takes a good set piece. Nothing more, nothing less.
He's lacking so much that's needed for a '10' in a possession team.
Nah he's grand in the right system - for instance, he'd thrive in the Arsenal system IMO. He needs the team built to his strength though which is my whole irritation with our transfer policy post SAF.I agree a bit.
He is not suited for a number 10 role in the PL neither though I fear. Not for a possession based ga,e like ours anyway. He is too lightweight to play in the centre of the park where all the action takes place. I rate him but I am just not sure whether Mou actually had every reason to sell him. There just doesn't seem to be a position in the EPL that suits him perfectly.
I agree a bit.
He is not suited for a number 10 role in the PL neither though I fear. Not for a possession based ga,e like ours anyway. He is too lightweight to play in the centre of the park where all the action takes place. I rate him but I am just not sure whether Mou actually had every reason to sell him. There just doesn't seem to be a position in the EPL that suits him perfectly.
Pretty much agree. Especially about the passing. He puts final touches on moves, from a very advanced position. But his ability to play the ball behind a defence isn't particularly great. Whereas how often do we see Silva play that inside channel pass to his full backs? The 'assist bedore the assist'.This. Many people are under the illusion that he is a creative, David Silva kind of player. As someone else said his biggest assets are in holding possession and the ability to finish/take brilliant set pieces. He doesn't possess the creativity, nor the skill set, to shine in the no10 role. As a second striker, which is a completely different role, he would shine but LVG doesn't play with such a formation. I would even argue that his creativity is largely overrated. He is very capable of putting in good balls and his passing accuarcy is sublime but his ability to read between the lines and see potential runners is actually quite poor on the whole and this is what I mean by creative.
Pretty much agree. Especially about the passing. He puts final touches on moves, from a very advanced position. But his ability to play the ball behind a defence isn't particularly great. Whereas how often do we see Silva play that inside channel pass to his full backs? The 'assist bedore the assist'.
I'd disagree that he's great at holding possession, though. Keeping possesion, yes. but holding it himself? Not so much.
Thats probably what you meant though.
But we pretty much agree on Mata.