Eric'sCollar
Asked for his wife's permission before signing up
Stop it Juan!
Stop it Juan!
I am not really sure, I think people see words like "winger" and "out wide" and automatically think that your wide players have to play as wide as possible and run down the outside and whip crosses in constantly. But it isn't really the case here, all you have to do is look at Depay and Young and how they play their role and assume that to give balance to the team that Juan Mata has to be doing the exact same thing. Which he clearly isn't, he's out of position a lot I have found and tends to stay back and slow down our counters as well as ball watch from deep while we go forward. It is as though he must hold Darmians hand through everything.Halle-fecking-lujah!!
How is that so difficult for some people to get their head around?
Halle-fecking-lujah!!
How is that so difficult for some people to get their head around?
Well he can be criticized for his performances as a playmaker too. He deserves praise because he's one of our most productive players in terms of end product but he hasn't been a great playmaker for us. We don't have great options, but ideally if he can't provide a genuine threat to the fullback using pace and dribbling ability, then he should be getting on the ball, dictating and running the show.mI'm sorry Sam, I know you're agreeing with it because its another way to complain about pace and width but surely you can see its pseudo-intellectual nonsense.
What does the quote 'he spends too much time inside and not enough time forward' actually mean? Those things aren't mutually exclusive.
Taking it on face value though, a look at our relative positions vs Liverpool shows that Mata, actually, was our second most advanced player behind Depay during the Liverpool match and actually spent more time 'forward' than Young did (presumably Ashley Young is a player you'd like to see over Mata on the right).
So Mata actually spent most of his time both forward and inside, probably quite unexpectedly for a player being asked to play on the inside right channel. If you want Mata to not be in the team and instead favour a traditional right winger who will isolate his full back and cross the ball then fine. BUT JUST SAY THAT. Don't pretend like it's an enlightened critique of the failures of Mata to perform as a playmaker from the right because its not.
You have to look back at the previous games to see what is being discussed.What does the quote 'he spends too much time inside and not enough time forward' actually mean? Those things aren't mutually exclusive.
Taking it on face value though, a look at our relative positions vs Liverpool shows that Mata, actually, was our second most advanced player behind Depay during the Liverpool match and actually spent more time 'forward' than Young did (presumably Ashley Young is a player you'd like to see over Mata on the right).
That isn't what he's saying, that is what you think he (we) wan't. Nobody is pretending to critique some pseudo scientific view of our football. He's not playing forward enough and not influencing our play in a dynamic way. That is the bare fact, people seem to want to use pseudo science to explain that he's a false winger, inside 10 in some sort of magical formation where we don't play a right inside forward for a reason. We don't, Mata has just been poor.So Mata actually spent most of his time both forward and inside, probably quite unexpectedly for a player being asked to play on the inside right channel. If you want Mata to not be in the team and instead favour a traditional right winger who will isolate his full back and cross the ball then fine. BUT JUST SAY THAT. Don't pretend like it's an enlightened critique of the failures of Mata to perform as a playmaker from the right because its not.
Even his end product this season has not been that great at right inside forward. Two assists, one from a set piece and one from so far out of position. His goal was a back post tap in as well. He has been quite productive in the past though. He's also had a couple of really good low shots saved. I'd like to see more of that and less pointless back passing in our circle on our side of half way.Well he can be criticized for his performances as a playmaker too. He deserves praise because he's one of our most productive players in terms of end product but he hasn't been a great playmaker for us. We don't have great options, but ideally if he can't provide a genuine threat to the fullback using pace and dribbling ability, then he should be getting on the ball, dictating and running the show.m
I think given the circumstances he is a pretty productive player, at least relative to our team. I'm guessing the percentage of his contribution would be quite high in the games he's played. But yeah, with Mata, the concerns are different. It's what he does the rest of the game that needs to be improved, or alternated with in some games.Even his end product this season has not been that great at right inside forward. Two assists, one from a set piece and one from so far out of position. His goal was a back post tap in as well. He has been quite productive in the past though.
People are saying we need width on the right hand side. That implies that either Young would replace him on the right side or Memphis moves over from the left and Young comes in on the left. The net result of this to the team is Young in, Mata or Herrera out.
Amen, I agree 100%.Because that still leaves us an attacker short on the right hand side, which is a massive issue. We need someone on the right, doing what Young did on the left yesterday (preferably to a higher level mind). Playing at pace, taking defenders on, and putting the opposition defence on the back foot. Too much of our attack is played in front of the oppositions defence because we don't have anyone that can penetrate them or run beyond them. Its easy to defend against, and for the defence to keep their shape, and plays a major part in why we're not opening teams up. All our threatening attacks also only come down the left too, and I'm not really sure how you, or anyone else, can be happy with that. I can't help but feel its because everyone likes Mata, wants him in the team, so is willing to accept/ignore the obvious problems his lack of pace and penetration causes. Fwiw, I want Mata in the team too, just not on the wing. The difference Young and Marcial made yesterday was night and day with the first half. We'd look a far, far, more threatening team with genuine pace and penetration on both wings, not just one.
What circumstances? True, relative to our team. Or are those the circumstances? (not having a dig just curious)I think given the circumstances he is a pretty productive player, at least relative to our team. I'm guessing the percentage of his contribution would be quite high in the games he's played. But yeah, with Mata, the concerns are different. It's what he does the rest of the game that needs to be improved, or alternated with in some games.
Yup.What circumstances? True, relative to our team. Or are those the circumstances? (not having a dig just curious)
We don't need width, we need someone to attack from the right wing. If Mata roams around, only Darmian stays on the right side, and for obvious reasons he will be reserved in his actions.
Obviously, Mata is not a winger so nobody expects him to bomb down the wing ala Tony. Last year he was a false/inverted winger and I thought that role suited him perfectly- he played high up the pitch, he could link up with RB, Herrera or striker, could utilize his excellent positioning and finishing (he has striker instincts). This season he's been playing different role, doing simple things most of the time, which he's so good at. He isn't even that influential for our play, but I have a feeling he's one of the first names on the team sheet because of moments of effectiveness. He's the kind of player who can play shit game but still manages to grab a goal, so it's understandable. It happens quite often so I don't blame van Gaal, I just think we could do better if he played like last season.
This is clearly van Gaal instructions so I don't blame Juan, but I don't like him in that role at all. I really don't understand how playing Mata so deep benefits the team in general, especially that we have proper midfield right now and we don't really need him there. I hope Young goes back to the team and we play like we did last season, with Mata staying high up the pitch instead of being everywhere else then on the right wing. Surely if van Gaal wants him in the team, he would be more effective playing higher on the wing?
Who cares if it's a symmetrical formation or not, the point is we have nobody attacking from the right wing and I find it bizarre that so many people don't see a problem with that. We’re having real troubles with scoring goals from open play- so far we’ve scored 3 goals in 4 EPL games. Maybe that has something to do with attacking only from the left.
He hasn't been playing a different role at all. The heat maps from various games show that he's one of our furthest forward players. I have no idea where people are getting this idea that he's playing ridiculously deep.
What heat maps?He hasn't been playing a different role at all. The heat maps from various games show that he's one of our furthest forward players. I have no idea where people are getting this idea that he's playing ridiculously deep.
What heat maps?
That isn't what he's saying, that is what you think he (we) wan't. Nobody is pretending to critique some pseudo scientific view of our football. He's not playing forward enough and not influencing our play in a dynamic way. That is the bare fact, people seem to want to use pseudo science to explain that he's a false winger, inside 10 in some sort of magical formation where we don't play a right inside forward for a reason. We don't, Mata has just been poor.
De Telegraaf say he's going to play No 10 today.
This is the Juan Mata performance thread. If you want to spew agenda driven bile about Rooney go and do it one of the seventy other Rooney threads on the board.Criticising and nitpicking Juan Mata whilst Wayne Rooney seemingly gets away with murder with some our supporters during his shocking start to the season, is right up there with the worst this forum could produce.
So bad today.
Actually i dont think he has been very good since joining United. He had a lot of bad/invisible games during his time but masked some of them with a goal or assist.
Don't think he was near as bad as, say, Herrera was in the CL game a few weeks ago. Think some people are overly hard on Mata.