prarek
Full Member
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2012
- Messages
- 8,636
I don't think anyone's suggesting that one player can solve our problems.He is not our saviour, problems are much more complicated than one player for another.
I don't think anyone's suggesting that one player can solve our problems.He is not our saviour, problems are much more complicated than one player for another.
I don't think anyone's suggesting that one player can solve our problems.
Why does everyone have to be so melodramatic? Is anyone really suggesting that he'll single-handedly solve our problems? That would be foolish to think. However, I imagine that many, including myself, think that he would be an upgrade over Fellaini.He is not our saviour, problems are much more complicated than one player for another.
Ah sorry, just read this after previously posting. Still, I think he would help out.I have not suggested anyone has, i'm just stating my opinion on him.
Yep. People will always find reasons not to play someone and just stick with what the managers doing, like many did with Herrera, but the thing is, nobody is playing better. Herrera came in and was an immediate improvement and we as a team look better with him on the pitch. Right now, same thing at the #10 position. Rooney has clearly shown he's our best striker, so we need to change things in the hole. Mata has been inconsistent this season but is clearly our most talented player, so he really should be getting more chances.I can understand if the team was playing well without him but they're not. And he's barely getting a look in. Not that he's been impressive either mind but even at his worst he's always contributed with goals and assists fairly regularly.
I reckon he'll end up at Barca and never look back.
More than 10 games since he got a start... Ridiculous.
We dominate possession and it's all a bit slow. This suits Mata and would be similar to how he had it at Chelsea, so why not give him a go as number 10 behind Rooney. This Fellaini nonsense needs to stop.
Barca don't play with a 10, so he won't fit there.I reckon he'll end up at Barca and never look back.
I'm depressed.
If Mata doesn't start the next game, it could become a life issue.Is this a general important life comment or just because Mata isn't getting game time?
If Mata doesn't start the next game, it could become a life issue.
I just can't for the life of me get my head around the argument for him not playing or people wanting Fellaini ahead of him.
If we have the ball at our feet (those of Mata's not Fellaini's) we don't need the physicality, ability and quality will shine through. We have to go with Fellaini because he is the only player tall enough to see the ball in the lights when it comes down.Well I'd be prepared mate.
It's a physical thing, we have so many light players that LvG favours having Fellaini in there, and of the other CM roles Mata does less work than Herrera and Blind.
If we have the ball at our feet (those of Mata's not Fellaini's) we don't need the physicality, ability and quality will shine through. We have to go with Fellaini because he is the only player tall enough to see the ball in the lights when it comes down.
When you have the ball at your feet you need to move quickly with it and be able to protect it, unfortunately Mata is so easily knocked off the ball and has no pace to get away from challenges when he has it, that's why LvG is reluctant to use him, and I think in the PL you need a physical player in midfield, all the top 7 teams have one bar us.
Well play a physical player in midfield and Mata in front where he is at his best. Not rocket science. Mata has proven he can do it in the Premier League, it's not his physical attributes holding him back, it's van Gaal's selections .When you have the ball at your feet you need to move quickly with it and be able to protect it, unfortunately Mata is so easily knocked off the ball and has no pace to get away from challenges when he has it, that's why LvG is reluctant to use him, and I think in the PL you need a physical player in midfield, all the top 7 teams have one bar us.
Judging by Fellaini performances, he don't really do well with the ball at his feet. He was only good when the ball is in the air. There is no reason to have a physical player in midfield when he commits foul every challenge. We need a player who tackles the ball and not the player. Mata on the other hand has good technical skills and ball distribution which is what a number 10 should be doing. Back to the same argument, City has Silva, Chelsea has Oscar and Real Madrid has Isco.
Well play a physical player in midfield and Mata in front where he is at his best. Not rocket science. Mata has proven he can do it in the Premier League, it's not his physical attributes holding him back, it's van Gaal's selections .
Herrera with Blind or Carrick in midfield with Mata in the hole.
I can accept arguments to have two strikers and that could affect Mata but when Fellaini is played off the striker with Mata on the bench just kills me.
Reckon we'd have won the match had he started instead of fellaini, and I'm no Mata fan.
Its crazy really, i can see the physicality argument and think Fellaini is useful but not for every game.
Im convinced that as with Rafael the manager is doing it to stroke his own ego of doing things his way and as per usual relying on his odd decisions for him to be heralded a genius, not working though is it?
Judging by Fellaini performances, he don't really do well with the ball at his feet. He was only good when the ball is in the air. There is no reason to have a physical player in midfield when he commits foul every challenge. We need a player who tackles the ball and not the player. Mata on the other hand has good technical skills and ball distribution which is what a number 10 should be doing. Back to the same argument, City has Silva, Chelsea has Oscar and Real Madrid has Isco.