Jose Mourinho | Sacked by Roma

Difference one manager is signing him on free transfer and wants him to play as wingback, other wanted to sign him as winger and wanted to spend 50+ million and that too in pre-Neymar transfer market.

Jose isn't backed is nonsense and I won't be repeating same posts again, I already had this discussion with you when you logged in as Loida. I won't repeat same thing again.

Don't care about the other bs in your post, there is a reason why Jose is at Roma, old Jose wouldn't have even spat in Roma direction as it was beneath him. For you Jose is king and he can do no wrong, for others he can and he has done plenty of mistakes. His career is on downward trajectory, that's why he is at Roma and soon it will be Torino and then Speiza.

Conte is miles better manager than Jose and it's the case since 2016. Winning conference league changes nothing, how many league titles did Jose win in last 7 years? How many title challenges?

Difference is one manager signed the guy at 33 years old. The other one wanted him as his prime but rejected because your board thought they know about football better. You have no problem spending 50m to wank bissaka yet making so much fuss when Jose wanted Perisic because afraid he would threw out your bumboy Martial. Jose was at Roma because he wanted it, Ancelotti agent just said Madrid wanted Jose before they went for Ancelotti because Jose refuse it. Like i said before , he loves a challenging job , turning mediocre club into top one but only if they back him unconditionally. It's just stupid to think Conte is better than Mourinho, one work with Chelsea and Inter, won 4 trophies in total after signing like over 30 players at both club , couldn't even win conference league because he lost to farmers at group stage.Mourinho worked with shit United , Spurs and Mediocre Roma , barely get backed and still win similar amount of trophies. Chelsea was 5th when he was sacked from , threw tantrum at Inter because they no longer back him after making them broke , mostly will be trophyless at Spurs.
 
Last edited:
Winning conference league changes nothing, how many league titles did Jose win in last 7 years? How many title challenges?
Dont tell us you were expecting him to win a league title with Roma or Tottenham?


And what seems like a tinpot cup for you is still a great achievement for Roma. They were third favourite among the semi-finalists… They hadn’t won any silverware in 14 years. And he generally did a decent job in his first season there. You gotta give him that.

I don’t really like him. His time here was quite boring football, and I was hopping Feyenoord would take the trophy. But he seems different. Roma have been playing some attacking and entertaining football most of the season. (Not in the final though, where he retreated to his pragmatic fundamentals.)
 
Difference is one manager signed the guy at 33 years old. The other one wanted him as his prime but rejected because your board thought they know about football better. Jose was at Roma because he wanted it, Ancelotti agent just said Madrid wanted Jose before they went for Ancelotti because Jose refuse it. Like i said before , he loves a challenging job , turning mediocre club into top one but only if they back him unconditionally. It's just stupid to think Conte is better than Mourinho, one work with Chelsea and Inter, won 4 trophies in total after signing like over 30 players at both club , couldn't even win conference league because he lost to farmers at group stage.Mourinho worked with shit United , Spurs and Mediocre Roma , barely get backed and still win similar amount of trophies. Chelsea was 5th when he was sacked from , threw tantrum at Inter because they no longer back him after making them broke , mostly will be trophyless at Spurs.

Madrid wanted Jose and Jose rejected it? Good joke, Jose would have walked on legos to end up at Madrid.

It's stupid to even compare Jose 2010 with Jose 2022, Jose won 4 trophies in 2010.

Chlelsea were 5th when Conte was sacked, do you want to know where Chelsea was when Jose was sacked? Too embarrassing.

Anyone who rates Jose ahead of Conte in 2022 should get their heads checked or give up football.
 
Dont tell us you were expecting him to win a league title with Roma or Tottenham?


And what seems like a tinpot cup for you is still a great achievement for Roma. They were third favourite among the semi-finalists… They hadn’t won any silverware in 14 years. And he generally did a decent job in his first season there. You gotta give him that.

I don’t really like him. His time here was quite boring football, and I was hopping Feyenoord would take the trophy. But he seems different. Roma have been playing some attacking and entertaining football most of the season. (Not in the final though, where he retreated to his pragmatic fundamentals.)

I don't know if it's you or someone else, keeps repeating "it's tin pot for you" and something else. I didn't, I said winning conference league changes nothing, it's like CL level club winning europa, decent achievement but won't make them better than elite managers. Likewise Europa level team winning conference league isn't a big achievement. Roma didn't win trophy for 14 years as they didn't create 3rd European trophy all those years, this is the first time they created trophy for teams finishing below 6th or 7th in top leagues. Still it's a decent achievement, it's not as great as Jose fans want everyone to believe and winning this cup won't make him better than managers like Conte.

So Roma or Spurs shouldn't be expected to challenge for league title, how about top 4? If not, what's the point of manager, especially Jose whose fans think he is elite manager in 2022.
 
I don't know if it's you or someone else, keeps repeating "it's tin pot for you" and something else. I didn't, I said winning conference league changes nothing, it's like CL level club winning europa, decent achievement but won't make them better than elite managers. Likewise Europa level team winning conference league isn't a big achievement. Roma didn't win trophy for 14 years as they didn't create 3rd European trophy all those years, this is the first time they created trophy for teams finishing below 6th or 7th in top leagues. Still it's a decent achievement, it's not as great as Jose fans want everyone to believe and winning this cup won't make him better than managers like Conte.

So Roma or Spurs shouldn't be expected to challenge for league title, how about top 4? If not, what's the point of manager, especially Jose whose fans think he is elite manager in 2022.

Conte has to win more than Jose to become a better manager than him.
 
Conte has to win more than Jose to become a better manager than him.

So Jose is better manager than Klopp?

We are not talking about their careers, it's their current level.

All I want to hear is, yes because Jose won conference league finals and Klopp lost champions league finals.
 
So Jose is better manager than Klopp?

We are not talking about their careers, it's their current level.

All I want to hear is, yes because Jose won conference league finals and Klopp lost champions league finals.
Klopp won 4 trophies in 7 seasons, spending 800m , lost 4 out of 5 European finals he had in his career ( won one against serial bottler spurs ) , if that was Mourinho you would definitely called him finished dinosaur. And yes even in current level Mourinho is still the better manager , give him the same amount of time and money ,you can bet your house jose would have won much more. And you actually had the chance , but instead your club chose to side with players , replace him with a clown and is now already half decade trophyless while playing shit football.
 
Last edited:
It's amazing how it is 2022 and people still rate Jose
 
Klopp won 4 trophies in 7 seasons, spending 800m , lost 4 out of 5 European finals he had in his career ( won one against serial bottler spurs ) , if that was Mourinho you would definitely called him finished dinosaur. And yes even in current level Mourinho is still the better manager , give him the same amount of time and money ,you can bet your house jose would have won much more. And you actually had the chance , but instead your club chose to side with players , replace him with a clown and is now already half decade trophyless while playing shit football.

:lol:

I would bet my house on Jose not reaching CL finals. We might have appointed clown but at least we got rid of toxic clown.
 
Klopp won 4 trophies in 7 seasons, spending 800m , lost 4 out of 5 European finals he had in his career ( won one against serial bottler spurs ) , if that was Mourinho you would definitely called him finished dinosaur. And yes even in current level Mourinho is still the better manager , give him the same amount of time and money ,you can bet your house jose would have won much more. And you actually had the chance , but instead your club chose to side with players , replace him with a clown and is now already half decade trophyless while playing shit football.
This is blatantly that mental Roma fan that joined at the start of the season and got banned for being such an obvious WUM.
 
Dont tell us you were expecting him to win a league title with Roma or Tottenham?


And what seems like a tinpot cup for you is still a great achievement for Roma. They were third favourite among the semi-finalists… They hadn’t won any silverware in 14 years. And he generally did a decent job in his first season there. You gotta give him that.

I don’t really like him. His time here was quite boring football, and I was hopping Feyenoord would take the trophy. But he seems different. Roma have been playing some attacking and entertaining football most of the season. (Not in the final though, where he retreated to his pragmatic fundamentals.)

Think it's more he's struggling to make top 4 now as a manager. Couldn't in first season at Man. United but europa win saved that just given Celta Vigo player missed an open goal last minute in the SF. And obviously wasn't going to do much in 18/19 when he got sacked.

At Spurs he finished 6th after coming in and then when they were sacked they were 6th/7th and that was late April.

See if Roma can finish higher next season but 6th is just about par, no more no less.

He's still certainly a very effective cup manager in right competitions but his league performance has been mediocre for a while given he can't quite lift clubs in the way a Conte can.
 
Conte has to win more than Jose to become a better manager than him.

Conte can lift clubs now in a way Mourinho can't.

Takes over Inter when they were finishing 3rd/4th. Very nearly wins the league first season and then does it second.

Takes over Spurs mid season and gets them 4th, Mourinho couldn't quite do it.

His european record is an oddity but will surely have a good run at some stage, perhaps next season at Spurs if they drop into the europa.
 
Conte can lift clubs now in a way Mourinho can't.

Takes over Inter when they were finishing 3rd/4th. Very nearly wins the league first season and then does it second.

Takes over Spurs mid season and gets them 4th, Mourinho couldn't quite do it.

His european record is an oddity but will surely have a good run at some stage, perhaps next season at Spurs if they drop into the europa.

Lets see him win trophies before anyone can say that he is better than Jose.
 
So Jose is better manager than Klopp?

We are not talking about their careers, it's their current level.

All I want to hear is, yes because Jose won conference league finals and Klopp lost champions league finals.

In that case was Pep a much better manager than SAF when both of them were managers?
 
Lets see him win trophies before anyone can say that he is better than Jose.

He won a major league title 12 months ago. :lol:

People on here would really have this Mourinho as manager over Conte if offered a straight choice.
 
In that case was Pep a much better manager than SAF when both of them were managers?

SAF wasn't at his peak from 2009-2013, still he was winning league titles.

Yes, if not in 2009, at least from 2010-11 Pep was better manager than SAF and that's not comparing their careers.
 
He won a major league title 12 months ago. :lol:

People on here would really have this Mourinho as manager over Conte if offered a straight choice.

No, can't even imagine that.

Only few Jose fans, not majority for sure.
 
SAF wasn't at his peak from 2009-2013, still he was winning league titles.

Yes, if not in 2009, at least from 2010-11 Pep was better manager than SAF and that's not comparing their careers.
I’d argue SAF was at his peak in 2013, no other manager was walking the league with that side.
 
He still didn't do much better than his predecessor: if we're comparing to 2019/20, it pales. If we compare to 2020/21 the only thing that was better was the xGA.
And Mourinho was announced in April 2021, which meant Roma players basically lost any motivation to run for Fonseca on that final run of the season.
 
No, can't even imagine that.

Only few Jose fans, not majority for sure.

You are trying to change the posts now. It is not who is more popular or which clubs wants them more? Its is who has been the better manager. You look at the trophies they have won. Jose so far has won a lot more than Conte.
 
You are trying to change the posts now. It is not who is more popular or which clubs wants them more? Its is who has been the better manager. You look at the trophies they have won. Jose so far has won a lot more than Conte.

What am I changing? Did I say Conte had better career than Jose or overall Conte is better manager than Jose?

I clearly said from 2016 (at least) Conte is better manager than Jose, not sure how anyone can argue against that going by their records in last 7 years.
 
Conte can lift clubs now in a way Mourinho can't.

Takes over Inter when they were finishing 3rd/4th. Very nearly wins the league first season and then does it second.

Takes over Spurs mid season and gets them 4th, Mourinho couldn't quite do it.

His european record is an oddity but will surely have a good run at some stage, perhaps next season at Spurs if they drop into the europa.

This comparison doesn't make sense. As I said in another thread, Conte is in his prime now while Mourinho is at the later stage of his career. Of course Conte now is better, it's not rocket science. Logic says you should compare both at their prime. Prime Mourinho was Chelsea-Inter period, and there's no contest really who was better in this case. One of them won the treble in his prime, you know.
 
What am I changing? Did I say Conte had better career than Jose or overall Conte is better manager than Jose?

I clearly said from 2016 (at least) Conte is better manager than Jose, not sure how anyone can argue against that going by their records in last 7 years.

Why 7 years? You could say that Claudio Ranieri was the best manager too in that sense. After all he won the PL too.
 
Why 7 years? You could say that Claudio Ranieri was the best manager too in that sense. After all he won the PL too.

If anyone asks who is the best player in the world, do you rate current ability of the players or their historical past?

Likewise, for managers what they did some 15-20 years ago doesn't matter, Jose was elite manager, he isn't now. Conte is elite manager and levels about Jose as on 30th May 2022, if you don't want last 7 years.
 
I don't remember anyone here saying it's a fantastic achievement. Why don't you stop inventing things out of your mind or saying things no one said ? Saying it's a nice trophy to win doesn't equate it being "fantastic achievement", ffs. Things aren't black and white. Mourinho himself just said after that Conference League final that it was expected for Man United to win EL
I can’t be bothered to go searching through threads for who said what. I don’t think you would be surprised that others said it but if you don’t think it was an achievement for Mourinho to win the EL with United then that’s fair of you. Still, he did claim it was (one of?) his greatest achievements so I hope we both agree it was a bit of a stupid claim to make, regardless of what he said last week to please Roma fans.

Since when reaching advanced stages in the 2nd tier European competition while facing teams far worse than you in terms of budge, players quality and experience mean you're good in Europe ? Especially when you drop to this 2nd tier competition after fecking up your CL group. What, are you expecting us to be KOed by Real Sociedad and Garanada ? We were a CL team. It's the bare minimum to win this competition at this condition, literally.
First, you said we have been awful in Europe after saying we have been absolute shit, I’m just saying that’s untrue, I never said anywhere we have been good in Europe.

Goimg by your logic, are you saying PSG shouldn’t be considered as being good in France and Bayern shouldn’t be proud of record in the Germany?

The difference between Mourinho and Ole is that one of them managed to achieve the expectation and win this competition while the other bottled it twice (while not performing any better in CL at the time).

Well Villareal had to play like this because they're far inferior to us in terms of money and players available. At the end of the day they executed their plan and succeeded, flawlessly as well. When we faced Ajax we had a plan and executed it as well. What was Man United plan to win against Villareal ?
For a team which was vastly superior on terms of budget, player quality and experience, do you think we should be proud of the match we played to beat Ajax? Some would say it was rather embarrassing.
 
This comparison doesn't make sense. As I said in another thread, Conte is in his prime now while Mourinho is at the later stage of his career. Of course Conte now is better, it's not rocket science. Logic says you should compare both at their prime. Prime Mourinho was Chelsea-Inter period, and there's no contest really who was better in this case. One of them won the treble in his prime, you know.

Well said.
 
I think the jury is still out on whether Jose still potentially has it at the very top level. If he takes Roma significantly forward next season - top 4 finish etc then he may well get another shot at the very top.
He would be mad to do it in England again though. Part of the reason it didnt work out at United or Spurs is that half the fanbase refs and media really really dislike him - he isn't going to get any decisions or leeway and half the fanbase want him gone before he starts and then playing super negative in all the big games just goes down like a lead balloon too.
Perez likes him and I can see him having another 1/2 years at Real Madrid if he Is genuinely seen as successful at Roma.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Invictus
Mourinho isn’t a better manager than Conte in 2022, and he certainly isn’t a better one than Klopp in 2022

wtf is wrong with some of you
 
I can’t be bothered to go searching through threads for who said what. I don’t think you would be surprised that others said it but if you don’t think it was an achievement for Mourinho to win the EL with United then that’s fair of you. Still, he did claim it was (one of?) his greatest achievements so I hope we both agree it was a bit of a stupid claim to make, regardless of what he said last week to please Roma fans.

I like how you claim things then don't even care about proving your claims being right or not. You claimed it was seen as fantastic achievement and when you are faced with the prospect of bringing proof you said you can't be bothered. Great way of discussion.

And Mourinho's quote about being one of his greatest achievements was about finishing 2nd in the league not Europe League.


First, you said we have been awful in Europe after saying we have been absolute shit, I’m just saying that’s untrue, I never said anywhere we have been good in Europe.

And your proof on it being untrue is us reaching the 2nd tier European competition final beating teams like Garanada and Real Sociedad, then losing the final to the 7th placed La Liga side whom have never won anything before in their history. We can't even win the 2nd tier competition in the continent but that's a proof that we aren't awful in Europe. Meanwhile teams of our statue, money spent and quality of players are competing in Champions League.

The funny thing is you are taking this claim seriously.

Goimg by your logic, are you saying PSG shouldn’t be considered as being good in France and Bayern shouldn’t be proud of record in the Germany?

When will you stop inventing imaginary points and just reply on the questions asked? When did the domestic record ever come in the discussion?

And how are you putting Bayern in this discussion anyway? They have won Champions League 3 years ago and are almost always at advanced stages in CL, bar the odd year.

For a team which was vastly superior on terms of budget, player quality and experience, do you think we should be proud of the match we played to beat Ajax? Some would say it was rather embarrassing.

I don't get the deal with this final that you keep on bringing. That Ajax final was one of the easiest finals I have witnessed for United. Under no point in the match were we under threat of any dangerous chances nevermind conceding. The way you keep talking about it, it makes me think we were binned back or were defending for our lives or something. Ajax had a lot of ball but they did nothing useful with it. Game ended after Pogba's goal.

And again, United had a plan back then and executed it. What was Man United plan to defeat Villarreal? I asked this question and you simply dodged it.
 
Difference is one manager signed the guy at 33 years old. The other one wanted him as his prime but rejected because your board thought they know about football better. You have no problem spending 50m to wank bissaka yet making so much fuss when Jose wanted Perisic because afraid he would threw out your bumboy Martial. Jose was at Roma because he wanted it, Ancelotti agent just said Madrid wanted Jose before they went for Ancelotti because Jose refuse it. Like i said before , he loves a challenging job , turning mediocre club into top one but only if they back him unconditionally. It's just stupid to think Conte is better than Mourinho, one work with Chelsea and Inter, won 4 trophies in total after signing like over 30 players at both club , couldn't even win conference league because he lost to farmers at group stage.Mourinho worked with shit United , Spurs and Mediocre Roma , barely get backed and still win similar amount of trophies. Chelsea was 5th when he was sacked from , threw tantrum at Inter because they no longer back him after making them broke , mostly will be trophyless at Spurs.
Around the time Jose allegedly wanted Perisic, for similar money Liverpool signed Mané, City got Sané, and Real secured Vinicius.

Those are the kind of left wingers a manager coaching a club of Utd stature should request, and fans eventually regret missing out, not Perisic...
 
I like how you claim things then don't even care about proving your claims being right or not. You claimed it was seen as fantastic achievement and when you are faced with the prospect of bringing proof you said you can't be bothered. Great way of discussion.

And Mourinho's quote about being one of his greatest achievements was about finishing 2nd in the league not Europe League.




And your proof on it being untrue is us reaching the 2nd tier European competition final beating teams like Garanada and Real Sociedad, then losing the final to the 7th placed La Liga side whom have never won anything before in their history. We can't even win the 2nd tier competition in the continent but that's a proof that we aren't awful in Europe. Meanwhile teams of our statue, money spent and quality of players are competing in Champions League.

The funny thing is you are taking this claim seriously.



When will you stop inventing imaginary points and just reply on the questions asked? When did the domestic record ever come in the discussion?

And how are you putting Bayern in this discussion anyway? They have won Champions League 3 years ago and are almost always at advanced stages in CL, bar the odd year.



I don't get the deal with this final that you keep on bringing. That Ajax final was one of the easiest finals I have witnessed for United. Under no point in the match were we under threat of any dangerous chances nevermind conceding. The way you keep talking about it, it makes me think we were binned back or were defending for our lives or something. Ajax had a lot of ball but they did nothing useful with it. Game ended after Pogba's goal.

And again, United had a plan back then and executed it. What was Man United plan to defeat Villarreal? I asked this question and you simply dodged it.
We are going around in circles, you’re not responding to any of my questions and I see you struggling to draw the discussion into Mourinho vs Ole which I’m absolutely not interested in doing so I avoid questions like the last one you asked.

Again, I think we agree if you don’t think Mourinho winning the EL should be considered an achievement but I’ve seen it on the Caf’ you won’t blame me for not being interested in digging up posts.

All I’m saying is we play to beat what’s in front of us. I can’t say we have been awful or we’re absolutely shit if we beat most inferior teams and draw against another inferior team. It’s different from saying we’re not good enough in Europe.

Concerning Bayern and PSG I’m using your logic about Utd being superior in terms of budget, players and experience to justify us not having the right to claim good performances in the EL. By the same argument, FCB and PSG have no right to claim being good in their respective local leagues.
 
Around the time Jose allegedly wanted Perisic, for similar money Liverpool signed Mané, City got Sané, and Real secured Vinicius.

Those are the kind of left wingers a manager coaching a club of Utd stature should request, and fans eventually regret missing out, not Perisic...

City signed Salah, City signed B Silva when Jose wanted Perisic. It was in 2017-18 season.

Your post is spot on, fans moan as if we missed Neymar/Messi.
 
We are going around in circles, you’re not responding to any of my questions and I see you struggling to draw the discussion into Mourinho vs Ole which I’m absolutely not interested in doing so I avoid questions like the last one you asked.

Again, I think we agree if you don’t think Mourinho winning the EL should be considered an achievement but I’ve seen it on the Caf’ you won’t blame me for not being interested in digging up posts.

All I’m saying is we play to beat what’s in front of us. I can’t say we have been awful or we’re absolutely shit if we beat most inferior teams and draw against another inferior team. It’s different from saying we’re not good enough in Europe.

Concerning Bayern and PSG I’m using your logic about Utd being superior in terms of budget, players and experience to justify us not having the right to claim good performances in the EL. By the same argument, FCB and PSG have no right to claim being good in their respective local leagues.

You are the one who haven't responded to a single question asked, refused to bring a proof on your claims about people and Mourinho saying winning EL was "fantastic achievement", invented the point about Bayern and PSG which no one brought (and doesn't apply to Bayern anyway) and refused to respond to what Man United plan was against Villarreal (which I asked twice and you dodged it twice).

But at the end I'm supposedly the one who didn't respond to the questions! Fantastic.
 
You are the one who haven't responded to a single question asked, refused to bring a proof on your claims about people and Mourinho saying winning EL was "fantastic achievement",
What proof do you want? Digging up posts? What would be the purpose if you already said you don’t agree with that idea? I’m happy we both agree it wasn’t any achievement at all. That’s all that matters, really.


invented the point about Bayern and PSG which no one brought (and doesn't apply to Bayern anyway)
Certainly, I brought up that point but I already explained why I drew the parallel with Bayern and PSG. I can take the pains of repeating if you didn’t get it the first time: you said doing well in a competition where we face teams far worse in terms of budget, players quality and experience didn't mean we’re good in Europe (something I never said, I simply said it meant we’re neither awful nor absolutely shit in Europe).

After which I made a parallel with FCB and PSG which have vastly more resources (financial and otherwise) than all their league opposition and yet both are considered the best for beating their inferior local rivals. You play what’s in front of you. My point being, it’s wrong to call United an awful or absolutely shit team in Europe for regularly beating only inferior teams and having a draw with another inferior team at a European final. Get it now?


refused to respond to what Man United plan was against Villarreal (which I asked twice and you dodged it twice).
I don’t need to respond to this because I don’t quite understand why you’re trying to make it a Mourinho vs Ole debate. Ole has got nothing to do with this thread, nor with our discussion.
 
What proof do you want? Digging up posts? What would be the purpose if you already said you don’t agree with that idea? I’m happy we both agree it wasn’t any achievement at all. That’s all that matters, really.

If you're claiming something, you're supposed to bring proof to support your claim. Otherwise I can invent anything out of my mind and then say "nah, I'm not arsed to dig up posts for people saying that". What does prevent me from doing that ?

Like, ironically enough, you claimed Mourinho's quote of "one of my best achievements" was about EL win while it was about the 2nd position in the league and you just ignored this point and moved on.


Certainly, I brought up that point but I already explained why I drew the parallel with Bayern and PSG. I can take the pains of repeating if you didn’t get it the first time: you said doing well in a competition where we face teams far worse in terms of budget, players quality and experience didn't mean we’re good in Europe (something I never said, I simply said it meant we’re neither awful nor absolutely shit in Europe).

After which I made a parallel with FCB and PSG which have vastly more resources (financial and otherwise) than all their league opposition and yet both are considered the best for beating their inferior local rivals. You play what’s in front of you. My point being, it’s wrong to call United an awful or absolutely shit team in Europe for regularly beating only inferior teams and having a draw with another inferior team at a European final. Get it now?

Do you realize that PSG have been mocked for the past several years for winning their league titles while being underwhelming in CL ? That they're always mocked for winning "farmers league" every time they fail in a CL campaign ? No one consider PSG winning their league title an achievement considering the big gap between them and their rivals, and whenever they bottle it in Europe, everyone makes fun of them.

And the argument doesn't work on Bayern, because even though they're indeed much stronger than their domestic competitors and winning their league isn't a big achievement nowadays, they're also a major force in Europe and are always playing in advanced stages in CL and were CL champions 3 years ago.

If Bayern dropped to EL from CL group and lost to Villareal in the final no one will consider this a a good European campaign, unlike what you're trying to force for a team of Man United caliber, whom are supposed to compete in Champions League, not playing regularly in 2nd tier European competition every year while not even being able to win it bar once, and lost the final to a far inferior team to them. Man United shouldn't be playing in Europe League, more importantly shouldn't be playing in it that regularly, the fact we're competing in it alone means we're awful. Dropping to it from CL group means we're godawful.

I don’t need to respond to this because I don’t quite understand why you’re trying to make it a Mourinho vs Ole debate. Ole has got nothing to do with this thread, nor with our discussion.

This isn't a Mourinho vs Ole debate. You said we lost the final only due to PKs as if we played a good game, deserved to win and were unlucky to lose. The reality is Villareal played the final with the plan to reach PKs, they had a plan and succeeded in it. Meanwhile we did nothing worthy to note in the 120 minutes, our tactical gameplay and subs were pretty bad and really deserved nothing out of this day. The team with the plan won, we had no plan to win this day and the fact this happened against a far inferior side to us in terms of quality and investment is more of a proof we're awful, rather than a proof we haven't been shit in Europe.

And you're the one who brought the Ajax final into this discussion from the start by the way. You're the one who decided to compare this EL campaign to the one Mourinho brought from the start, not anyone of us, you. Everything after that was me responding to you, and you won't have to "dig up posts", just return few pages back.
 
What happened when they last met in a final?
Phil Jones :(



Dammit i just watched that to refresh my memory of the game and I wished I hadn't as it's just annoyed the hell out of me. How many mistakes can Jones make FFS and how did Pogba mess that free header up
 
Last edited:
Phil Jones :(



Dammit i just watched that to refresh my memory of the game and I wished I hadn't as it's just annoyed the hell out of me. How many mistakes can Jones make FFS and how did Pogba mess that free header up



So nothing to do with Jose at all:rolleyes: