Half the meltdown is simply because Man City have been better than us. It seems people are forgetting they have one of the best managers in the world and have more spending power than us. There's no shame in being worse than them; so long as we are in touching distance with them; we still have a shout at the league.
Precisely this, we've had our best start for 6 years but people can't accept the fact we are not top. Thereby again repeating the same arguments, they have had same time, similar amount of money. How dare we are not level on points with City? Forgetting the fact we're without our best and most influential player in Pogba for past month and squad is ravaged with injuries in central midfield and defence.
Every man and his dog knew what Mourinho's approach was going to be in big away games, he had a far more talented side at Real Madrid yet every time he played Barcelona or Atletico it was on the back foot. Why are people finding it so hard to accept his approach away to Liverpool when they themselves knew what they were getting with him? It simply doesn't make any sense to me to moan about things we've known for eternity.
It appears you're missing the point and making up this gulf in their tasks merely to defend our manager. You'd think Pep took over Barca circa 2009 going by your post which is laughable given the discourse on this thread about City's flawed and ageing squad prior to this summer as well as last. But obviously since we're falling a bit off the pace the narrative must change.
My take: Let's take a look at where the two squads we're when both managers took over. But if we really want to be a bit more impartial let's not ignore where the two squads were at this summer because there's clearly some who unwilling to look at that.
Prior to their taking over: We finished level with City before both managers took over. City had a better striker (Aguero) and playmakers (Silva and KDB) than us while we had a better goalkeeper and defense than them. I'd say their squad was stronger but not by much. It was much older than ours too I think which is why they often got overrun.
Proper to this season: Since then, both managers have gotten backed with big money. City already had established stars in attack so went for fullbacks, goalkeepers and young attacking talents. We went for star names in Lukaku, Matic, Pogba and Mkhitarian. Not to mention the excellent Bailey in defence. I think mourinho spent superbly (on paper). And this huge gap between the two which people pretend exists simply does not anywhere. We have the better goal keeper. Our right back is as good. Our centre backs are better. Our central midfielders are better. Our strikers are as good when you consider lukaku actually manages to stay fit. Martial and Rashford are no lesser than sane and Jesus. City are better in the playmaking department and left back (well they've lost their lb now).
So all this "OMG, pep has so much to work with" needs to end because it's mere excuses. Both managers have been backed. We've improved where we needed to in the window and they've improved where they needed to. Now there's not much in it. The tired lines of two years ago don't apply now. It's time to deliver and be accountable.
Pep didn't take over peak Barca but the quality of players which he inherited were much better than ones inherited by Mourinho. Ask yourself, who are best players for Manchester City? David Silva, Sergio Aguero, Kevin de Bruyne, Vincent Kompany? All were present before Pep stepped in, now compare the situation with us. With the exception of De Gea, who exactly of top tier did Mourinho inherit? All our top performers under him have been signed under his reign be it Ibra, Pogba, Bailly, Matic or Lukaku.
Also when you look at the holes in squad which respective managers had to fix, Pep had to reduce overall age of the squad and fix the defence. Lots of overpaid, past it players were moved on to his credit but in the end there was only one real weakness i.e., their backline and I am not going to post the numbers which it took to fix that. Come to the other side, we had a strong base of De Gea and Valencia in defence but 3 of the other positions needed addressing. One of them still remains a major issue still after 3 windows (Left back), move on to midfield it consisted of past it Carrick, much maligned Fellaini and Ander Herrera. He had to address that too. In attack we were complete shambles with only Rooney as a recognized CF along with Rashford, still lacking a creative #10 and a wide man. He's tried to address all of that, his signings show that but even you yourself would agree we lack a proper left back and a winger. Thereby meaning more holes for Mourinho to plug. I look at City's squad and their weakeness is only in depth (mainly a DM) whereas not only there is a lot of deadwood still in our squad we still lack specialist players in certain positions. Again going back to my original point, Mourinho's task has been more difficult than Pep.
Your third para pretty much answers the questions you're asking of him, on paper we are a match for them. But, take out 2 of our most important player in Bailly and Pogba and our centre backs are not 'better' than City anymore nor are our midfielders.
Not this nonsense again. Do you know how many players Pep has had to move on as well? You think he did that despite them being good enough for him! He did that as they were deadwoods.
In his current attack B. Silva, Jesus, Sane are new players and all are doing brilliantly. Aguero has revitalized and Sterling has improved. KdB is becoming a beast. So basically he has had to revamp half his attack and he did that for less than what we paid for Lukaku and Pogba.
He had to buy a new GK, a new CB, new FBs, new CMs and yet you think City's squad was geared more towards Pep. Are you having a laugh?
I know full well how much deadwood Pep has shifted but he has brought in more players to make up for it compared to Mourinho who has brought in 7 in space of 3 windows, given time Mourinho will be same and take our squad up a level.
Speaking of their attack, they key personnel still remain David Silva, de Bruyne and Sergio Aguero. All were performing at a very high level before he went there, he has integrated youth to them but take out his signings in Jesus, Sane and B Silva and they'd still put most team to swords. Would the attack which Mourinho had at helm last summer do that?
Coming to his other signings, only new CM he has brought is Gundogan and that is more for cover rather than first team. The mid trio which is so crucial to his philosophy and with which he's dominating games of Fernandinho, Silva and KDB was already at his disposal. His biggest job was to fix the defence and even that took more than an year. Mourinho has had to fix/revamp our entire XI basically be it defence, midfield or attack.