buckooo1978
Full Member
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2008
- Messages
- 13,879
not sure the lack of intensity for the first 30 mins was his fault but we certainly improved and Lingard really improved us
The record isn't a disaster.Just looking at his record against top 6 this season
P7 W3 D1 L3 (not bad at all)
Home - P3 W2 D0 L1 (lost vs City, yet to play Liverpool and Arsenal at home)
Away - P4 W1 D1 L2 (lost vs Chelsea & Spurs, drew vs Liverpool, still to play City away)
That is definitely not bad as some people on this forum make out to be.
Would be interesting to see similar stats for other top 5 teams' managers, but I am just too lazy to put it together
No I didn't. PL doesn't have 5 super teams. There wasn't a title race since City won in 2013-14.
The record isn't a disaster.
But moving forward, the games against the top 6 are getting more and more important.
We won't be winning the title anytime soon unless that record improves.
Yeah I don't get it, even when we won it's just cause Chelsea was worst. Well they were worst in part cause we were good. It works both ways.Well said. The way we turned the game around gave me a bit of a glow yesterday. Even when we put four past teams earlier in the season, according to some, it was "only because they were crap teams." I agree with you, there really is no hope for posters who seem to revel in the negativity.
The record isn't a disaster.
But moving forward, the games against the top 6 are getting more and more important.
We won't be winning the title anytime soon unless that record improves.
And that's why people are still complaining though. We beat Chelsea in a game of 2 halves. First half was awful, and we set up like how he wants, to contain, and try to counter. Second half we set up to dominate the ball and be proactive and try to win. The 2nd half was good. If he reverts back to type and we set up to contain when we play home to Liverpool days before we play home to Sevilla, it'll be a mess. Because we are awful at it. Mourinho might like it, maybe in the past he could do it effectively, but the only thing he's shown in 20 months with us so far is that he can't get them to be an organized defensive unit when we attempt to park the bus. We can defend pretty well as a team if we are more on the front foot, but we are awful the second we go in contain mode and lose all semblance of composure.
I really enjoyed how we came from behind and won the game yesterday. iirc, there was a stat that showed we’ve scored the most goals via substitutes than any other team this season? #EffectingTheGame
Good to see a shift in the poll.
Erm, Chelsea clinched the title last season on 12th May. They hardly had it in the bag by February did they.
I voted for option three and I'm going to stick to it. I don't think he's the right manager to go forward for us. Our attack doesn't look coherent, our defense is basically dependent on whether De Gea has a good match or not in most of the matches and the midfield looks devoid of creativity.
Hopefully in four months or fifteen months or so, I'll be proved wrong and people will quote this and laugh at it but I sincerely doubt.
We are in our 3rd rebuild cycle post Sir Alex. Unlike under the previous 2 managers, this one holds some promise, at least in terms of results. I would rather give time to Mourinho to complete the rebuild and try to lead this team to success (PL/CL Trophy) before we hand it over to some other manager. Bringing in a new manager at this point can potentially disrupt the whole rebuilding cycle and we may have to start from scratch once again. On the flip side, a new manager can come in and utilize the players more efficiently and get them playing and performing to their potential. Is that risk worth taking? At this point of time, I think not. Starting all over again will just break the morale of the whole club and will take us further back.
If that's the game plan, we're pretty poor at executing. Once we have the ball, it takes us forever (and 24 touches) until we finally move forward.The game plan is clear - win the ball and go for counter. I think that the strategy fits the players well. The biggest issue is that we don't transition from defense to attack with enough consistency.
If that's the game plan, we're pretty poor at executing. Once we have the ball, it takes us forever (and 24 touches) until we finally move forward.
The problem with Mourinho is really that he is very negative in his approach. He does not believe that his team could dominate but is just reactive. Hence we look so shit at times and why we are unable to win against Newcastle or Sevilla
Given that there was a consensus that Jose would be a short term appointment to bring back the winning culture of the club, in that respect he isn't living up to my standards.
2 trophies last season & likely to have our best PL season by far since SAF retired.
As far as winning culture goes I’d say he’s certainly on the right track.
We are entering a period in which Jose's personality will test the mentality of this club. We are seeing rumors of dressing room uncertainties and declining quality of football, but none of the major achievements that we were expecting.
Given that there was a consensus that Jose would be a short term appointment to bring back the winning culture of the club, in that respect he isn't living up to my standards.
I do recognize that this season has been taken over by the mammoth figure that is citeh, which has prevented any aspirations of PL success. So i would be willing to give him next season to attempt to clinch the league. If he werent to win it, he needs to leave. There is no long term plan that Jose could build that would be in line with the culture of this club, as I alluded to in the first paragraph - so I wouldnt give him the luxury of time.
So whoever long term manager you had in mind after jose needs to leave if he doesn't win the league.
That's your standard?
@breakout67
I don't think it's fair to determine beforehand that Jose is here for the short-term. He came into a job where there were different criteria then he had at his other jobs. The board has just extended his contract, which if seen out, is 4 years. If he wins a major trophy next season I would fully expect the board to give him a fresh contract to tie him down for another 2-3 years. It also wouldn't make a great deal of sense from his position to take the United job with view to it being short-term when it was one hell of a rebuilding job.
@breakout67
I don't think it's fair to determine beforehand that Jose is here for the short-term. He came into a job where there were different criteria then he had at his other jobs. The board has just extended his contract, which if seen out, is 4 years. If he wins a major trophy next season I would fully expect the board to give him a fresh contract to tie him down for another 2-3 years. It also wouldn't make a great deal of sense from his position to take the United job with view to it being short-term when it was one hell of a rebuilding job.
I agree with you, I was just having a go at people that hold higher expectations for certain managers over others.
If we are better next season and narrowly miss the title and do well in other competitions, I see no reason not to let him have more time. As long as we are getting better and winning trophies then it's fair to let him work.
Well you see, Mourinho is pegged as a 'short term' manager so he will be held to different standards. Rather than taking his performance on merit, it's easier just to reaffirm your pre-conceived notion.
Not to mention; he is the only short term manager that actually gets called as such.
Any manager that manages this club has in my opinion certain minimum requirements:
- CL football every season
- year on year progression
- regular trophies
He delivered all that, you still want him out
Presumably there are more minimum requirements:
Win majority of games against top 6 opposition.
Play with width: attack attack attack.
Always play Martial and Shaw on the left when fit.
Never be a horrid meanie to our players so they feel sad and might want to leave.
That really didnt come across as sarcasm. At all.Wow, the cafe really has gotten bad that I need to add white text to that. My apologies! I've added the white text for your convenience.
I think Mourinho has done enough to warrant more time at the club, and so long as we keep winning trophies and challenging in the PL and CL then I am happy with him.
If we drop out of the top 4 he'll come under intense scrutiny but I don't think we will post Chelsea game. That was massive for us.
The ability of this team vs the team under VG is much higher - yes we have spent a lot of money but the improvement is there for all to see. Sanchez will only get better as he gets accustomed to our systems and if we improve our defenders (especially full backs) and add a quality CM addition I think we can challenge the elite level of clubs where we want to be.
Wow, the cafe really has gotten bad that I need to add white text to that. My apologies! I've added the white text for your convenience.
I think Mourinho has done enough to warrant more time at the club, and so long as we keep winning trophies and challenging in the PL and CL then I am happy with him.
Short term? Here's a pop quiz for you. Name a manager that has stayed in top club for longer than 3 years.
The list is not many.
Poch, simeone, and i don't know.. tuchel ? Sari ? Allegri?
Name a manager that stays succesful for longer than 5 years in a club : 0
Not to mention; he is the only short term manager that actually gets called as such.