Really depends how we are going to play. But a good coach can make a Neves-Mainoo double pivot a fearsome proposition. If one signs Neves you face some difficult decisions. It’s not that a double pivot with both as 6/8 hybrids wouldn’t work, it’s just that it will naturally slightly stifle their offensive instincts. They are both more than capable of playing that way, and both have the defensive nouse to do the job.
But signings Neves means you choose between (a) playing them both as double pivots, creating essentially a 4-2-3-1 shape and a “if you go, I stay” symbiotic relationship, with a Bruno or Mount in front of them, or (b) you sacrifice your 10, play both of them as forwarding thinking 8’s, and have a defensively minded single pivot behind them; which likely necessitates another signing.
Before pulling the trigger we need a clear idea of how we are going to play, and the stomach to make the difficult choices. Assuming those factors are in place, then you don’t miss the opportunity to sign a player of his calibre, age, and potential. He will be a world class player, and together with Mainoo, a midfield pair that the club can build around for the next decade plus. The midfield is the heartbeat of the team, so this is one signing I would make before any other.
How any of us see this lining up, is pretty immaterial. It’s the head coach knowing how we are going to play, and building the team to fit that, that matters. Personally I would like to see us prioritise players that treat the ball with care, have exceptionally high technical ability, a good work rate, and are team orientated, as opposed to individualistic. I’d like to see a team that treats the ball like it is precious, and can retain possession under extreme pressure and duress. Mainoo and Neves both fit the bill in every regard. It’s also why I’d prefer to see Mount, for example, as our LW or third midfielder. He is quietly excellent, works hard, rarely gives it away. He’s not flashy, he’s not particularly quick (although no slouch), but he’s technically superb, and intelligent on and off the ball. I’d like our team to be full of players like that, because that’s how a team becomes greater than the value of its parts. Not through repeated feats of individualistic marvel.
Onana often gets touted in here as a more appropriate midfield option, as a deeper, more physical midfielder. A “true DM”. One that will allow Mainoo to play as a more advanced 8. But he’s a very misleading player. His gifts are primarily physical, although on a technical level he’s quite capable, and because of this he struggles to play as a single pivot. He doesn’t have the first touch under pressure to receive the ball facing his own keeper, and turn and play a line breaking pass. So more often than not, he just plays it back the way he is facing.
Yes, he is physically dominant when he can turn and face the play, and will get stuck in to the opposition and rarely be run past; but in order to have effective build up play from the back, Mainoo is still going to have to drop deep to pick up the ball, because he’s the only one of the pair with the technical ability to receive under pressure and turn upfield. So if you’re going to have to play a double pivot, no matter which one of Onana or Neves you buy, then buy the far better player in Neves.
There’s this rampant assumption that because Onana is a big powerful unit, he’s the player we need to sign so we can have two forwarding thinking midfielders in front of him. But it’s flawed thinking. His ability to screen the defence by himself is decent, but that’s only half the proposition. The part where we have the ball, he’s just not adept or experienced at playing as the sole pivot. And that’s a problem. If we want to play with a single pivot, then we’ll need a player who is as good receiving the ball under the pressure of a high press, as he is screening the defence from attacking transitions.