UNITED ACADEMY
New Member
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2018
- Messages
- 13,127
- Supports
- Erik ten Hag
First off, no. It doesn’t strike me as particularly unfair on Antony at all. Unfair on Rashford, maybe.
Rashford has played seasons with Ibrahimovic, Lukaku and Cavani upfront (pls don’t tell me any one of them was Bergkamp style) often playing RW to accommodate Pogba or Martial on the left, in a team struggling for top 4 most seasons and in a much tougher league. Yet his scoring stats are still better than Antony’s playing in the Dutch league, with Ajax. So, please…
Well, that's not true.
In 16/17 with Zlatan, Rashford had 5 league goals playing 1703 minutes. While Antony had 9 league goals playing 1774 minutes in 20/21.
In 17/18 with Lukaku, Rashford had 7 league goals playing 1810 minites. While Antony had 8 league goals playing 1736 minutes in 21/22.
And you’re also ignoring what I said, about not basing it purely on stats but in seeing both play. Rashford on the left plays more like forward on the wing. Antony plays more like a winger. You’re also ignoring what I said about this not being a final conclusion, players do evolve, but this is certainly what I’m seeing for now.
You were the one who started talking about Salah, Mane, Rashford, and Antony's stats. The 55 goals was you the one who mentioned it first, Antony's stats at ajax was also you, and your false statement about Rashford had better scoring stats than Antony were also started by you, which I had to reveal their stats to call it as false.
In fact, I didn't base it on stats butI based it on what I watched and I view Antony and Rashford talent as more goals provider than assist provider. The reason why you are seeing Antony plays more like a winger because he doesn't play with the Bergkamp type of striker.
No, that’s very clearly a wrong opinion. £15m for Dan James and £80m for Antony are clearly transfers of a different risk. Dan James didn’t work out yet we made profit. If Antony doesn’t work out (touch wood) both the financial and opportunity costs are much higher. It’s clearly higher risk.
And it isn’t just more money = more risk. Haaland had a release clause and only cost £60-odd million. Yet clearly at that money he was a lower risk compared to paying £20m for Amad for example, who had barely played top flight football when signed.
You clearly misintepreted the opinion because you were the one who said this signing is a high risk. And I made a point that it shouldn't be matter anyway because high reward usually come from high risk, which the meaning is the signing might have high risk but if ten Hag can get the best out of him then we can get high reward of signing world class potential instead. Hence what I like about ten Hag at ajax developing players.
First off you don’t even know if Ten Hag wants that type of player or Felix in particular. He is the one who signed Haller (he had coached him previously at Utretcht) at Ajax and as you noted he isn’t exactly Bergkamp-style. You’re saying to put my faith in Ten Hag with such (potential) signing as if it’s Ten Hag’s choice to bring such a player. It isn’t, it’s yours. If Ten Hag chooses him, then we can talk about that.
Secondly, developing young players is one thing. But it’s better to develop them in low pressure environments without placing all your expectations on them or setting them up to fail. The Netherlands were such an environment. Felix already seems to not be coping too well with the level of expectation and price tag at Madrid. The coach might be trying to play different football here than Simeone is playing there, but the pressure and expectation… it won’t be too much different here at United. In fact it’s likely to be worse given how much of a fiercer competition for top spots the EPL is.
Whether ten Hag wants Felix or no is not really how the argument started though. You have no right to tell me not to talk about it. You were the one who jumped into my conversation, so you should have never jump into this conversation.
I raised a valid argument about how Bergkamp type of striker could benefit both Rashford and Antony, even though I am not in agreement or disagreement about this but as neutral perspective I see it as valid argument because I witnessed how Rashford looks better when playing with Martial while Liverpool won the league with Firmino to get the best out of Mane and Salah.
This valid argument is also aligned with ten Hag knows how to use formation with Bergkamp type of striker as he played Tadic in a role of false 9 where the striker offers more creativity and link up. And I see Felix to be developed world class in the same role or type of striker, and this is aligned with what I view in ten Hag's asset in developing players. It looks to me that you are not so convinced that ten Hag has the ability to develop players.