T00lsh3d
Has massive thighs.
- Joined
- Mar 20, 2014
- Messages
- 10,001
Jesus was great business at 45M, utter bollocks that he wasn’t
£45m isn’t much these days so it’s decent business, if your aim is top four. But if Arsenal have aspirations of winning the league, he isn’t good enough to be the main man at that level.
In this day and age it isn't.Cause it isn't. £45m is a lot of fecking money.
Well they are top of the league after 13 games so he and they can't do much more. He's been a great signing for him and someone like him in ETH system would take us to another level£45m isn’t much these days so it’s decent business, if your aim is top four. But if Arsenal have aspirations of winning the league, he isn’t good enough to be the main man at that level.
Well they are top of the league after 13 games so he and they can't do much more. He's been a great signing for him and someone like him in ETH system would take us to another level
Won't say he's a steal but it was very good business for the money. I think a lot of people were underrating the signing before it happened and now its gone to the other extreme where he's gotten a bit overhyped. Still a great signing for them, of course.
And yet you've wrote him off after the same 13 games, while they are topI said win the league, not be top after 13 games.
If we make top four then it'll be the first time in 6 years that we play in the CL. That'll be a great outcome and one that 99% of Arsenal fans would've taken over the summer. We take stock of our situation over the summer, get Partey backup, Jesus backup/competition and then have a go at the title. We're fighting a machine like team with the resources of a nation, asking for the title would be a tad big headed given our immediate history of being an EL team.£45m isn’t much these days so it’s decent business, if your aim is top four. But if Arsenal have aspirations of winning the league, he isn’t good enough to be the main man at that level.
I don’t think it’s fair to rate Jesus just based on goal return. His valuation shouldn’t be based just on that.
His introduction has raised the level of Saka, Martinelli and Odegaard around him. He’s a big component of their fast fluid build ups.
Similar to how Firmino in his prime didn’t score much but help elevate the game of those around him. It would have been unfair to value Firmino on a goal return as well.
I don’t think they need to because Arsenal have contributions from Odegaard and Xhaka who have both been operating as 8’s. It’s different to how Liverpool were heavily reliant just on the front 3 with very little from midfield.One of Saka or Matinelli are going to have to start producing Salah/Mane like numbers to compensate for Jesus then
I don’t think they need to because Arsenal have contributions from Odegaard and Xhaka who have both been operating as 8’s. It’s different to how Liverpool were heavily reliant just on the front 3 with very little from midfield.
I don't think he's any better than Martial. Very similar calibre of player stylistically.
How the feck is it even arguable that Jesus for 45m wasn’t a great signing?
And? He’s the key reason they’ve gone from missing out on top 4 to top of the sodding league.Because it's starting to dawn on people that he doesn't score that many.
And? He’s the key reason they’ve gone from missing out on top 4 to top of the sodding league.
Well no it isn’t arguable because it’s a stupid reason plucked from the same logic factory as Ronaldo should play because he scores goals.You asked why people think it's arguable, and I told you.
Well no it isn’t arguable because it’s a stupid reason plucked from the same logic factory as Ronaldo should play because he scores goals.
Yep. He always scored in short bursts throughout the season for you so his overall ratio was decent and during that period he was the best thing ever. Son is a similar sort of player in that senseIt's like we said when he got all this mad praise early in the season, he's the same player we had. Good, not great.
This, he's the signing of the summer due to the fee.How the feck is it even arguable that Jesus for 45m wasn’t a great signing?
And yet you've wrote him off after the same 13 games, while they are top
If we make top four then it'll be the first time in 6 years that we play in the CL. That'll be a great outcome and one that 99% of Arsenal fans would've taken over the summer. We take stock of our situation over the summer, get Partey backup, Jesus backup/competition and then have a go at the title. We're fighting a machine like team with the resources of a nation, asking for the title would be a tad big headed given our immediate history of being an EL team.
Honestly every time I watched him at City, he did looked OK and not really anything like you describe him.I’m beginning to realise how pep really is a genius. He mostly used Jesus on the right wing in his latter time at City. I can see exactly why now. He’s very good on the ball in terms of dribbling, very good under pressure and has the ability to drive inside with the ball. Even when City had no striker last season, pep would opt to use him wide. I imagine it’s due to his lack of prolific goal scoring.
I have to say I’ve seen him doing things at Arsenal that he didn’t show at City. Especially his willingness to dribble with the ball which suggests instructions at city were probably to dribble less. He’s a brilliant dribbler especially in tight situations. He’s one of few strikers who can manufacture a chance for themselves which is why it’s even more surprising he doesn’t score more.Honestly every time I watched him at City, he did looked OK and not really anything like you describe him.
Its haaland for anything under 100mThis, he's the signing of the summer due to the fee.
You're getting very emotional about this.
If you are going by fees alone then surely its Haaland?This, he's the signing of the summer due to the fee.
This could be a first season thing. I have seen a number of footballers play way beyond their capability in their first season only yo fade away. His relavely average play at City enhances my suspicion. To judge him a success, I'd wait till next season atleast.I have to say I’ve seen him doing things at Arsenal that he didn’t show at City. Especially his willingness to dribble with the ball which suggests instructions at city were probably to dribble less. He’s a brilliant dribbler especially in tight situations. He’s one of few strikers who can manufacture a chance for themselves which is why it’s even more surprising he doesn’t score more.
Its haaland for anything under 100m
If you are going by fees alone then surely its Haaland?
Haaland will have cost over £100m no doubt. City with their backhand tactics as usual. Anyone who thinks otherwise is plain naive.
He's definitely resurrected his career at ArsenalGood heavens. Now people are trying to crucify him for throwing himself on the ground? If Arsenal put in enough crosses he is eventually
And? He’s the key reason they’ve gone from missing out on top 4 to top of the sodding league.
Which only impacted the amount that Dortmund got from you. You paid almost double the release clause when taking the agent fees into account.It was literally a release clause.