worldinmotion66
Full Member
- Joined
- Jun 12, 2015
- Messages
- 2,068
Decent squad player, hard worker and good presser. There's a place for him in certain situations but he's not getting us to the level we need to be at.
We can all say loads of stuff on a forum and we have to play a little game to make a forum work but in reality all the geniuses throwing tantrums all summer in here watch football passively once per week and don't understand it as well as mourinho van gaal and sir Alex Ferguson. I don't make doing the little dance where we pretend we do but when it is to the degree of this thread and this type of tone it is embarrassing. I wish there was a United forum with a different type of tone but there isn't, just different pockets of debate... should really open the threads with lingards name in it anymore, but when it is so many players it's hard to avoidYeah let's just brush it all under the carpet and pretend he is actually a good player.
Decent squad player, hard worker and good presser. There's a place for him in certain situations but he's not getting us to the level we need to be at.
He's decent in scenarios where we need work rate and defensive work, like man marking a holding midfielder for example - basically what Park Ji Sung did for years in the big games away in Europe. Lingard has his uses and he's still a good player, just not good enough to play consistently for us and compete with the better clubs in the league.Only decent against mid table and relegation fodder.
Despite the goal, he's unbelievably irritating.
Hate to say it but he had a decent game today, and an excellent goal. Still his average level of shooting is shite
Nothing some lads just get emotional about random playersWhat did he do wrong?
Why do you hate to say it? You’re acting like he plays for another side.
So strange the hate people have for him. Guy loves the club, been part of the club for ages, and will probably never want to leave the club even if he is only a squad player. And he's a versatile one at that! I'm calling it now, but if we sign Dybala, he's going to have a great season and will be a starter. He's just in the wrong role. It's fine in terms of position, but people see him and think we need his type of player to be scoring and assisting loads, and when he gets those responsibilities on the pitch because we only have Rashford and Martial on the pitch who can currently do it, then he struggles. He's just not that player. If we manage to get Dybala alongside Martial and Rashford to be our main player in the attack, Lingard will do a great balancing job in a deeper role with his work rate, pressing, link up play and running with the ball to progress it down the pitch. He won't have the responsibility of being a consistent goalscoring or creative player, which he just isn't capable of and it leads to fans shitting on him even more. Instead, he'll play a support role and link it all up well to balance out the main 3 attackers with Pogba in midfield. Essentially this:
Martial - Dybala - Rashford
Pogba - McTominay - Lingard
Shaw - Maguire - Lindelof - Wan Bissaka
De Gea
It's not based on the game, it's based on his role in the team. We get Dybala, he's no longer that far forward where he looks pretty shit pretty often, and can instead provide a much more consistent level doing things he is actually good at without us caring that he barely scores.after one good game. I believe this is where people would normally insert a picture of Captain Picard.
So strange the hate people have for him. Guy loves the club, been part of the club for ages, and will probably never want to leave the club even if he is only a squad player. And he's a versatile one at that! I'm calling it now, but if we sign Dybala, he's going to have a great season and will be a starter. He's just in the wrong role. It's fine in terms of position, but people see him and think we need his type of player to be scoring and assisting loads, and when he gets those responsibilities on the pitch because we only have Rashford and Martial on the pitch who can currently do it, then he struggles. He's just not that player. If we manage to get Dybala alongside Martial and Rashford to be our main player in the attack, Lingard will do a great balancing job in a deeper role with his work rate, pressing, link up play and running with the ball to progress it down the pitch. He won't have the responsibility of being a consistent goalscoring or creative player, which he just isn't capable of and it leads to fans shitting on him even more. Instead, he'll play a support role and link it all up well to balance out the main 3 attackers with Pogba in midfield. Essentially this:
Martial - Dybala - Rashford
Pogba - McTominay - Lingard
Shaw - Maguire - Lindelof - Wan Bissaka
De Gea
He played in a midfield 3 for England in the world cup and had a very good world cup IMO. Hard to judge international football, but he plays the role pretty often at United as well (or a variation of the role). The way he plays he could definitely make it work. It'd essentially still be a 4-2-3-1, just switch between that and a 4-3-3 or 4-3-1-2 as the game goes on, but provided we do sign Dybala, I'm pretty sure we're going to be using that lineup the majority of the time.Herrera replacement? Could work, but is he good enough for the role?
He played in a midfield 3 for England in the world cup and had a very good world cup IMO. Hard to judge international football, but he plays the role pretty often at United as well (or a variation of the role). The way he plays he could definitely make it work. It'd essentially still be a 4-2-3-1, just switch between that and a 4-3-3 or 4-3-1-2 as the game goes on, but provided we do sign Dybala, I'm pretty sure we're going to be using that lineup the majority of the time.
It's not based on the game, it's based on his role in the team. We get Dybala, he's no longer that far forward where he looks pretty shit pretty often, and can instead provide a much more consistent level doing things he is actually good at without us caring that he barely scores.
He's taking the whole 'English Thomas Muller' thing too literally.What was the story with his socks yesterday? Looked really odd that they were pulled down so low.
I don't get this view. His technical skills are very good. Close control, short passing and first touch are all big strengths of his. What he lacks is end product.Yeah, it's weird because I've always thought he does alright on the pitch except in the opposition area. His movement and excellent midfield rotations help our poor midfield progress the ball; unfortunately, he doesn't have the technical skills or end product to go along with it and thus he's slated.
His stamina, tracking back, and positioning is quite good so if he can improve his tackling and strength he could possibly play in midfield for us in that RCM role.
What was the story with his socks yesterday? Looked really odd that they were pulled down so low.
Sure same in the games before aswellWhat was the story with his socks yesterday? Looked really odd that they were pulled down so low.
What was the story with his socks yesterday? Looked really odd that they were pulled down so low.
I don't get this view. His technical skills are very good. Close control, short passing and first touch are all big strengths of his. What he lacks is end product.
It should also be said that his directness is very important to the team. The likes of Mata, Matic, Pogba and Pereira are all prone to taking too many touches before releasing a pass. Lingard's one touch play is important to balance that out. We look noticeably more pedestrian when he's on the bench.
His goals/assists stats were really poor last season, but for some reason I fancy him to score 10+ goals in the league if he starts the season as it first choice #10 (which I think he will). He had a lot of bad luck, I would have preferred Pogba to pay in that role, but Ole obviously has other plans.
You made me see it. And I can't unsee it.Lingard should start wearing those Edgar Davids glasses when he's playing. It would make him even better.