Recently I watched an analysis where they compared what Martin Ødegaard and Lingard offer their respective teams in a no 10 role in terms of movement.
After Sociedad's match against Barcelona Valverde pretty much said that they couldn't handle Ødegaard's movement and the video evidence showed why and also why Lingard's assets (movement), which his defenders point to, is basically a myth.
Ødegaard was constantly roaming around in the hole offering their deeper midfielders a forward passing option all the time whereas the video evidence showed that, against Everton, Lingard was walking around hiding behind Everton players making it impossible for our defenders and midfielders to pass to him, causing our other three attackers to drop deep to receive the ball with someone constantly in their back, more often that not meaning the pass getting intercepted. And when he finally received a pass in a promising position then his lack of technique failed him.
Obviously, Ødegaard is way more talented than Lingard has ever been, but it clearly shows the importance of right movement (which is ridiculous to credit Lingard for) when you're playing as a no 10 in a 4-2-3-1. Not only will a lack of movement cause the defence and midfield to pass sideways due to a lack of other options, but it also causes the entire attack to drop deep.
When you add that with a complete lack of composure, vision and position, then you get a recipe for perhaps the most pointless attacking player ever (hyperbole?).